[ POLL ] Which National Religion?
My Ice Cream Religion is non-violent, and it's delicious!
_________________
♥♦♣♠
Well, if one *had* to choose a religion, then the Jains are indeed the most pacifist.
I disagree with Jainism's views about women being inferior to men, though, so I would probably choose Mahayana Buddhism instead, as it (often) combines pacifism with gender equality and tolerance.
Except when people start running out of ice cream (especially chocolate ice cream)... desperation will turn even the gentlest creature into a frenzied monster hell-bent on carnage, destruction, IRS audits, mayhem, devastation and apocalyptic doom.
Well, if one *had* to choose a religion, then the Jains are indeed the most pacifist.
I disagree with Jainism's views about women being inferior to men, though, so I would probably choose Mahayana Buddhism instead, as it (often) combines pacifism with gender equality and tolerance.
Except when people start running out of ice cream (especially chocolate ice cream)... desperation will turn even the gentlest creature into a frenzied monster hell-bent on carnage, destruction, IRS audits, mayhem, devastation and apocalyptic doom.
...and I guess we'll have to deal with the Heretics who choose to worship the false Sherbet God.
_________________
♥♦♣♠
[opinion=mine]
(•) Other: None of the above, nor any other not listed.
The freedom to express one's own religious beliefs should not be abridged, as long the expression of one's own religious beliefs violate no secular law -- secular law should have precedence in the physical world, while religious law should have precedence over the "spiritual" world. Just as laws shall not be made to require any religion to include one or more secular leaders as part of their pantheon, so too should no religion make any of its "laws" require the secular government to include their doctrines in their law-making and enforcement processes.
[/opinion]
_________________
(•) Other: None of the above, nor any other not listed.
The freedom to express one's own religious beliefs should not be abridged, as long the expression of one's own religious beliefs violate no secular law -- secular law should have precedence in the physical world, while religious law should have precedence over the "spiritual" world. Just as laws shall not be made to require any religion to include one or more secular leaders as part of their pantheon, so too should no religion make any of its "laws" require the secular government to include their doctrines in their law-making and enforcement processes.
[/opinion]
That opinion is reasonable and makes sense if all religions were invented by men. However, people who believe God established a religion are going to want laws based on what God revealed instead of the opinions of men.
I voted for Confucianism. It seems to be working for the Chinese, so why not give it a try?
Well, technically speaking, China formally dropped Confucianism as a national religion (more a philosophy, though, as Confucianism is mostly atheist) in 1905 when they abolished the Imperial Examination system (based on the Four Books - Sìshū).
One might argue that they are gradually becoming Confucian *again* after they began turning away from Communism in 1978, but that is an entirely different matter...
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,794
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,794
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Mostly secular (I'm a Lutheran myself).
But good luck liberating Texas, which is half-Evangelical, half-Catholic.
I'm a Lutheran, too. I think belonging to a relatively easy going church body that's none too large makes one prefer a secular state.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Mostly secular (I'm a Lutheran myself).
But good luck liberating Texas, which is half-Evangelical, half-Catholic.
I'm a Lutheran, too. I think belonging to a relatively easy going church body that's none too large makes one prefer a secular state.
What do modern lutherans believe,your quite liberal Kraichgauer.
Lutherans were the original radical christian fundamentalists.Luther made the set ups for Calvin's Total depravity theory.Although didn't support the other tenants of TULIP.
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas
Atheism = belief God doesn't exist
Agnosticism = unsure whether God exists
Neither atheist nor agnostic would have to mean you believe God exists
No religion that isn't either of above = you believe God exists but you don't care what He revealed?
Science flies you to the Moon, Religion flies you into buildings, and Faith flies you to Heaven.
_________________
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,794
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Mostly secular (I'm a Lutheran myself).
But good luck liberating Texas, which is half-Evangelical, half-Catholic.
I'm a Lutheran, too. I think belonging to a relatively easy going church body that's none too large makes one prefer a secular state.
What do modern lutherans believe,your quite liberal Kraichgauer.
Lutherans were the original radical christian fundamentalists.Luther made the set ups for Calvin's Total depravity theory.Although didn't support the other tenants of TULIP.
I wouldn't say fundamentalist, as Luther and his theological descendants pretty well considered Revelations to be little more than toilet paper. Luther himself thought the book should never have been canonized. We Lutherans today feel most of that book covers the history of the early church, told in the Apocalyptic language of Persia, and not totally of things to come. For instance, the Beast of Revelations, in our opinion, was the Emperor Nero, who had persecuted the church.
Yes, we still believe human nature is terminally flawed. But despite that, we believe we're saved through God's grace, earned by Christ. Depraved as human nature is, we believe in divine love and redemption. I think that differs from Calvin's doctrine of double predestination, which even Calvin had referred to as "the terrible doctrine."
Yes, I am liberal, personally. In fact, I probably stand out like a sore thumb in my own Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, especially in more recent times when my church has unfortunately taken a lunge to the right. But I'm hardly the only Missouri Synod Lutheran with my point of view.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
National Guard Sent to New York Subways |
06 Mar 2024, 8:10 pm |
House Intelligence Chairman - National Security threat |
14 Feb 2024, 4:18 pm |
Australia Marks National Day That Stokes Patriotism & Anger |
28 Jan 2024, 1:07 am |
Casual sex poll |
16 Mar 2024, 10:39 pm |