MaxE wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
cberg wrote:
Quote:
criminal neoliberal gangs
But heaven forbid we get in the way of our true saviors, the dear ole' criminal neoconservative gangs!
Like Hillary and Obama? You need to check the defintions of both word, and their policies, to know I'm correct.
Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism are not polar opposites of each other, in fact they are both more "conservative" than not. I usually see Neconservatism used as a epithet to describe Democratic politicians for whom Third-Party leftists refuse to vote. Neoliberalism is basically free-market capitalism but the term is used to belittle self-proclaimed liberals when accusing them of not understanding the "real" i.e. archaic meaning of the term "Liberalism".
The difference between neoliberalism and neoconservatism is the hyper-miltarism that the latter embraces.
In the late 90s, there was a document that was composed by a conservative think-tank entitled, The Project For The New American Century. It laid out the plans for expanding our hegemony in the Middle East with continual regime-change wars. That has certainly come to pass, and Obama was the most ardent supporter of this doctrine, taking us from two to seven wars. The creepiest part of that document was how we could use a major attack on U.S soil to further that goal.
Only Obama's enemies (on both Left and Right) try to label him as a Neocon. Don't forget the Libya thing had a lot of popular support at the time, not unlike the Gulf War (which I believe was the first big mistake of the post-Cold War era). But don't forget Obama took a lot of criticism for NOT sending troops into Syria and don't forget Zero Dark Thirty in which Obama is seen dragging his feet with regard to the Bin Laden assassination. If he was a Neocon then he was a piss-poor excuse for one.