Question for Christians on Intelligent Design
Folks...
Lets keep the words "depraved", and "deprived", straight please!
Starving children are "deprived".
The Marquis De Sade was "depraved".
Last edited by naturalplastic on 16 Dec 2020, 8:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lets keep the words "depraved", and "deprived", straight please!

Starving children are "deprived" people.
The Marquis De Sade was "depraved".
Thanks, corrected it in my post

_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
***** ***
AngelRho
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,102
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
No, don’t edit it. I want to make sure to keep the intended meaning. Let’s do a simple retraction here:
The human mind is depraved due to the effects of sin. We are often blinded to the nature of the relationship between creator and creation and mistake the world as ours to do with as we please. We don’t recognize it as God’s, hence the confusion. The direction the world takes, imperfections and all, towards becoming perfected by God through the process of time is a perfectly moral direction and the only one possible to accomplish God’s goal for creation.
It is human depravity that sees flawed human morality as superior to God’s.
As a Christian (Lutheran), I feel that one can believe in both God and science.
I think a lot of the Bible is metaphor, not to be taken literally (though it would be cool if we could live to be 900+ ).
I don't think the "days" mentioned in Genesis refer to literal 24-hour periods, but rather, millions of years. There is also no step-by-step process mentioned in creation. Therefore, it could be said that the Bible supports evolution.
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
AngelRho
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,102
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
I think a lot of the Bible is metaphor, not to be taken literally (though it would be cool if we could live to be 900+

I don't think the "days" mentioned in Genesis refer to literal 24-hour periods, but rather, millions of years. There is also no step-by-step process mentioned in creation. Therefore, it could be said that the Bible supports evolution.
I’m more of a Bible literalist. But the Bible does not spell out the days of creation as literal consecutive 24 hour periods. I have no doubt that God is powerful enough to create the world in that time frame with the fossil record being a remnant of a previous cycle of creation and destruction that happened beyond the scope of the Biblical record. Or even not...it could be entirely an effect of supernatural activity surrounding the Flood. The point is we don’t know, we can’t know, and how/when God created/destroyed/created the world is not even what Genesis is trying to tell us.
The days COULD for all we know been separated by millions of years. I’m ok with that. The exceptionally long lives, too, MIGHT have referred to ruling dynasties. Hebrew tradition held that children were extensions of their parents and kept them alive in a physical sense even after their actual death. Either the bloodline ran out given primogeniture, the dynasty lost its effectiveness, or there was a reason why a certain descendant gets mention...perhaps the founding of a city, a military commander, a king, etc. But...then again, maybe they DID actually live for hundreds of years.

(I'm not a theist, this is just my perspective if I *were* a theist)
God didn't create genetic disorders as a kind of punishment. The bio-chemical processes that allows life to exist and perpetuate itself are not perfect. They are prone to errors from within and interference from without. Many factors can cause genes to mutate in ways that are harmful to an organism, much in the same way that they can mutate in ways that are beneficial to an organism. (Assuming your creationism accommodates evolution as a creation of God).
The laws of the universe are not meant to bend to prevent human misfortune. Asking genes to not combine or mutate in ways that harm people is like asking food not to go bad or asking gravity to stop working when you fall off a building.
The laws of the universe are mechanisms that keep the universe running consistently. Questioning why they are sometimes unfairly harmful to us specifically or life in general sounds like human self-importance.
God didn't create these scientific processes so they *would* harm us so much as god created these processes such that they *could* harm us. Being subject to these laws is just what it is to be mortal.
_________________
Diagnoses: AS, Depression, General & Social Anxiety
I guess I just wasn't made for these times.
- Brian Wilson
Δυνατὰ δὲ οἱ προύχοντες πράσσουσι καὶ οἱ ἀσθενεῖς ξυγχωροῦσιν
Those in positions of power do what their power permits, while the weak have no choice but to accept it.
- Thucydides
What is the standard for determining which part is literal and which part is metaphor?
And who created that standard?
And what was their agenda when they created it?
_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011
envirozentinel
Forum Moderator

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,029
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria
@roronoa: Some good points there, and they help put things that don't go right, into perspective.
_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?
my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/
AngelRho
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,102
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
God didn't create genetic disorders as a kind of punishment. The bio-chemical processes that allows life to exist and perpetuate itself are not perfect. They are prone to errors from within and interference from without. Many factors can cause genes to mutate in ways that are harmful to an organism, much in the same way that they can mutate in ways that are beneficial to an organism. (Assuming your creationism accommodates evolution as a creation of God).
The laws of the universe are not meant to bend to prevent human misfortune. Asking genes to not combine or mutate in ways that harm people is like asking food not to go bad or asking gravity to stop working when you fall off a building.
The laws of the universe are mechanisms that keep the universe running consistently. Questioning why they are sometimes unfairly harmful to us specifically or life in general sounds like human self-importance.
God didn't create these scientific processes so they *would* harm us so much as god created these processes such that they *could* harm us. Being subject to these laws is just what it is to be mortal.
Good points. Where I part ways with theodicy is the assumption that the universe as we know it really is the best of all possible worlds. It is not. That world was abandoned after Eden. This is the ONLY possible world that allows for destructive forces in balance with creative forces. Genes mutate, people get tumors. And as much as we try to prolong life, we are really choosing a prolonged life in a universe that has us eternally dealing with tumors, viruses, other microbes, and auto accidents. Death is a mercy that ends physical suffering. God intended us for a perfect world. Condemning us to eternity in an imperfect world full of disease, well...that would just be another kind of hell.
Your comment on human self-importance is dead on. It’s not that humans are worthless or even worth less. It’s the depraved human notion (NOT ATTACKING ANYONE) that the Creator is subject to the whims and desires of all of humanity. You mentioned you are not a theist. I believe humans have to be selfish to the extent that it is rational to be selfish. There’s no shame in asking God “why” out of suffering. The issue is presuming to upstage omniscience by insisting you have a better way. It does not follow, at least beyond Eden, that there even IS a better way. The question “if God is so good...” is about a reasonable a question as asking “how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?” If you actually wanted an answer to the question, you’d never have to ask in the first place. You would already know. [Answer: there is no relevant answer. If you aren’t a Christian, you’re not actually interested in any answer. If you are a Christian, it doesn’t matter anyway because God already made a path to salvation.]
I think your response, even if you aren’t a theist, was thoughtful. Thank you.
Since the depravity subject has been raised & some readers might not be familiar with the theological concept of it here is a reference, https://www.gotquestions.org/total-depravity.html
While often misunderstood, the doctrine of total depravity is an acknowledgement that the Bible teaches that as a result of the fall of man (Genesis 3:6) every part of man—his mind, will, emotions and flesh—have been corrupted by sin. In other words, sin affects all areas of our being including who we are and what we do. It penetrates to the very core of our being so that everything is tainted by sin and “…all our righteous acts are like filthy rags” before a holy God (Isaiah 64:6). It acknowledges that the Bible teaches that we sin because we are sinners by nature. Or, as Jesus says, “So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.” (Matthew 7:17-18).
The total depravity of man is seen throughout the Bible. Man’s heart is “deceitful and desperately wicked” (Jeremiah 17:9). The Bible also teaches us that man is born dead in transgression and sin (Psalm 51:5, Psalm 58:3, Ephesians 2:1-5). The Bible teaches that because unregenerate man is “dead in transgressions” (Ephesians 2:5), he is held captive by a love for sin (John 3:19; John 8:34) so that he will not seek God (Romans 3:10-11) because he loves the darkness (John 3:19) and does not understand the things of God (1 Corinthians 2:14). Therefore, men suppress the truth of God in unrighteousness (Romans 1:18) and continue to willfully live in sin. Because they are totally depraved, this sinful lifestyle seems right to men (Proverbs 14:12) so they reject the gospel of Christ as foolishness (1 Corinthians 1:18) and their mind is “hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is unable to do so” (Romans 8:7).
The Apostle Paul summarizes the total depravity of man in Romans 3:9-18. He begins this passage by saying that “both Jews and Greeks are all under sin.” Simply put, this means that man is under the control of sin or is controlled by his sin nature (his natural tendency to sin). The fact that unregenerate people are controlled by their selfish, sinful tendencies should not come as a surprise to any parent. What parent has to teach his or her child to be selfish, to covet what someone else has or to lie? Those actions come naturally from the child’s sin nature. Instead, the parent must devote much time to teaching the child the importance of telling the truth, of sharing instead of being selfish, of obeying instead of rebelling, etc.
Some commentary related to last paragraph above, https://www.desiringgod.org/messages/al ... -under-sin
_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011
AngelRho
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,102
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
What is the standard for determining which part is literal and which part is metaphor?
And who created that standard?
And what was their agenda when they created it?
EXCELLENT questions, all of them. The Bible DOES make use of idiomatic language, so when a passage happens to be metaphor it’s usually fairly obvious. It’s a self-interpreting document. I get really nervous when I hear a believer say it’s all or mostly metaphor. If the scriptural basis for our faith has no or little literal basis, what objective basis do we even have for faith? I’m not sure I’d be a Christian if that were the case.
Just my opinion here, but if God is strictly limited to natural existence and cannot exhibit supernatural power, he’s not a god I’d be all that concerned with pleasing. Certainly not worth dying for. Christ crucified on a metaphor doesn’t carry quite the same strength as He literally died and was resurrected to save us from the eternal consequences of sin.
envirozentinel
Forum Moderator

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,029
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria
If we're indeed made "in his image" why does he seem to think so vastly differently from us? I've been trying for years to make sense of a lot of things as I did grow up in a fundamentalist church and also attended a charismatic one for some years, but eventually found there were numerous points I couldn't reconcile.
Especially in the Old Testament. For instance, contradictory statements "do not kill" against injunctions to "mercifully" kill all the men, women, kids, animals etc in some places. And that's just a start.
_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?
my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/
While often misunderstood, the doctrine of total depravity is an acknowledgement that the Bible teaches that as a result of the fall of man (Genesis 3:6) every part of man—his mind, will, emotions and flesh—have been corrupted by sin. In other words, sin affects all areas of our being including who we are and what we do. It penetrates to the very core of our being so that everything is tainted by sin and “…all our righteous acts are like filthy rags” before a holy God (Isaiah 64:6). It acknowledges that the Bible teaches that we sin because we are sinners by nature. Or, as Jesus says, “So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.” (Matthew 7:17-18).
The total depravity of man is seen throughout the Bible. Man’s heart is “deceitful and desperately wicked” (Jeremiah 17:9). The Bible also teaches us that man is born dead in transgression and sin (Psalm 51:5, Psalm 58:3, Ephesians 2:1-5). The Bible teaches that because unregenerate man is “dead in transgressions” (Ephesians 2:5), he is held captive by a love for sin (John 3:19; John 8:34) so that he will not seek God (Romans 3:10-11) because he loves the darkness (John 3:19) and does not understand the things of God (1 Corinthians 2:14). Therefore, men suppress the truth of God in unrighteousness (Romans 1:18) and continue to willfully live in sin. Because they are totally depraved, this sinful lifestyle seems right to men (Proverbs 14:12) so they reject the gospel of Christ as foolishness (1 Corinthians 1:18) and their mind is “hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is unable to do so” (Romans 8:7).
The Apostle Paul summarizes the total depravity of man in Romans 3:9-18. He begins this passage by saying that “both Jews and Greeks are all under sin.” Simply put, this means that man is under the control of sin or is controlled by his sin nature (his natural tendency to sin). The fact that unregenerate people are controlled by their selfish, sinful tendencies should not come as a surprise to any parent. What parent has to teach his or her child to be selfish, to covet what someone else has or to lie? Those actions come naturally from the child’s sin nature. Instead, the parent must devote much time to teaching the child the importance of telling the truth, of sharing instead of being selfish, of obeying instead of rebelling, etc.
Some commentary related to last paragraph above, https://www.desiringgod.org/messages/al ... -under-sin
Well, that goes against my experience.
To my experience, human nature is inherently limited and faulty but in most cases not inherently evil.
I'm a post-Copernican philosopher, I value observations plus logic over authority of the Holy Scripture and ancient philosophers.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
***** ***
Especially in the Old Testament. For instance, contradictory statements "do not kill" against injunctions to "mercifully" kill all the men, women, kids, animals etc in some places. And that's just a start.
Well by human standards a soldier is allowed to kill many people who are the enemy, but he's not allowed to kill anyone else. So that's not really vastly different from us.
The human mind is depraved due to the effects of sin. We are often blinded to the nature of the relationship between creator and creation and mistake the world as ours to do with as we please. We don’t recognize it as God’s, hence the confusion. The direction the world takes, imperfections and all, towards becoming perfected by God through the process of time is a perfectly moral direction and the only one possible to accomplish God’s goal for creation.
It is human depravity that sees flawed human morality as superior to God’s.
YeaH iT's True, From the
Beginning oF all Bibles;
More Precisely Words,
All Human Tools; God, Oh
No CuLTuRaL Clothes;
Humans Are Happier
More Satisfied
Naked Wearing
No 'Clothes', Still Now
In Nature's Abundance;
All Balancing Free in Flow
oF A Nice 'Garden of Eden';
Precisely, What i Do NoW in 'Heaven
Dancing
Singing
Free
Within
With
'Eve'
Aka
Katrina
Or 'Nova'
Depending
On Which 'Planet
of the Apes' Story
We Are Actually Doing
For Real in Autotelic Flow
Now (Some Folks Do Hairless;
i Do Hairy Born That Way Still)
God Yes, Both Story And Real,
HeHe; And i Verily Prove it Now True; Yes
It's True; Some of Us Are More Intelligent
Designers
Wearing
Wings
Still Now;
And Some Still
LiVE iN Ignorance
of Dark, The Real
'Sinning' of Life,
Only Still
LooKinG
For the Original
Greek Definition of
"Apocalypse" That Means
Lifting the Veils oF iGnorance;
Sadly, Still Covered By All 'Minion
Trump Ignorance' Don't Believe
(Just A Suggestion of
Course As Will Rules)
Everything
'Trump
And the
Old Testament
D E M A G O G U E
God' Says Do Shed
All the CuLTuRaL
Clothes And
Return
to Nature
In Balance
Mastering the Tool;
Yes, the Neo-Cortex or
Stay Lost As Prisoner Away From
Now of Time, Distance, Space
And Matter, Never Now Seeing
Feeling The Eternal Now For Real....
Yes
God
Yes
Heaven
As Face Palms
Thick For Even
Science is SmART
Enough Now to
Lift the
Same
Old
Testament
Veils oF iGNoRanCE...
Get Naked And PLaY iN FLoWinG Autotelic Balance With Nature AKA
God Stuff; Star Stuff; Yes, The Cosmos That Comprises All...US
With A 'Little'
Chaos
MaGiC
And Synchronicity
Sprinkled in Far Far
Away From Any Pre-Planning Design;
Yes, All Our Creativity We Breathe Now
or
Do Not...
'Or i Don't Know',
BE A STick In the
Mud iN A Book
ReFuSinG
to Move
Dance
Or Sing
A New Way to
See With God EYes
Now for Yes 'The Bible'
Is Surely The Authors
Who are still
Worshipped
Now;
Story
Rules Still Now;
Be Ruled By Other
Stories or Write, Dance,
And Sing; Art Our Free...PLay
NoW; Yes, If 'You' Need A Reason(s)
For It, CuRReNTLY NoW You May Not Be
SMiLinG iN Effortless Tight Rope Dance
Of Increasing Human Potential Intelligences All
As LiGHT BeaReRS BRiNGeRS STaR STuFF US Naturally Do too...
AKA
'Lucifer(s)'
Yes, Morning
Stars of Loving Life
BRiGHT SHiNiNG
LiGHT LiViNG Trees
CoLoRinG NeW BreaKinG Dawn Dance;
Yes, And Song of LoVinG LiFE NoW;
NoW JusT FLoWinG Doing God NoW
In Terms of Original Coke Jesus; Not Adulterated
By Centuries More of Scribe Mistakes And Intentional
So-called Holy Paul-Like Related Holy Spirit Changes; YeS, Uncovered
In Egypt As A Gnostic Gospel of Thomas Relates Life Before And After
The 'Apple'
Freer
For Either
We Intelligently
Live Our Life Balancing
Yin And Yang, Art and Reason
Or We Fall or We Fall As All Apples Eventually Do;
Yet, You
'See' that
iS Only Within
The Bounds of
Infinity; What
Breathes
Within
Beyond
All Human
Empirical
Measure;
IMaGiNaTioN,
Creativity, God Still Breathes
Free Within; No Matter How Humans Dress Up Free...
And Lock It in a Chasity Belt of Prison Above As Below...
-Pan
Just All
THeRE iS
ThaT Is To IT....
And Yes God Is 'It'
Or Beyond Infinity
Measure of What
Ever Metaphor
iMaGiNaTioN
Creativity
'God'
Us Creates Next...
i Choose Lifting Higher;
Neither Stagnating or Falling...
PriSoNers oF old Rotting Books...
Yet, It's True, Not Everyone Scores
100 Percent in Openness and Extroversion
On the Big Five Personality Test; Closed
Minds, Closed Books; Yes, Tradition Binds Both....
And Is
Necessary
For Big City
Life To Survive;
Therefore, Thereby,
Me and Eve Still in a Garden
Of Eden; Hidden FoResT in Tradition Still Naked Free...
Hehe as again in 'this Version' of 'The Planet
of the Apes', It's More Like
The Original
One,
'Eve'
is the
Silent Hero;
Those Dirty Dammed
Apes Lied About Her Then too...
Yet not in the Movie Version, 'The Book'....
Let's Get Real, 'Adam', Charlton Heston, On the
Beach With 'Eve', Nova, The Most Beautiful
Kind, Loving, Humble Empathic Woman in the
World; God Yes, Close Enough
to Naked for 'Government
Work' and 'Adam'
Is Pissed
off Because
'They Blew Up
All the CuLTuRaL
Tools And Clothes
Having No Clue
What He's
Gained
Now
in Reality
Naked And Free
Separated From All Those
CuLTuRaL Clothes; Yet, 'Eve'
Needs No Words At All to Understand She's 'God'....
Nor A Bird, Nor A ChipMunk, Nor Below A Sub Particle of An
Atom
All one
Spiraling
Flow Dance
And Song
Music
of
Water Waves
Ocean Whole Beach...
Having It All My Friend
Is As Far Away From Lost;
Not Seeing, Feeling, Sensing
Just The Fact That We aRE ALL Breath of God
Nature Free
or Trapped
iN CuLTuRaL
Clothes so
Who
Is the
Naked
'Christian'
Now, Charlton
or 'Eve', For You
See, Indeed We aRe
All Super Nova Explosions
Resurrecting From Crucible
Fire of Star Flower Death
Explosions; Gaseous
Star Dust Seeds We aRe;
Star FLoWeRS We Seed too;
Star Dust Iron FLoWinG iN Our Blood;
at Core of Our Only Heavenly HoME EarTH;
All the Rocks, too Cold and Hot In Space;
Yet, Folks
Still
Complain
About this
Heaven On
EartH Now;
So Salty,
About
All the
Flavors
Available Now
And Holy
CR8P 'They'
Spend Money
And Wanna Walk
On Lifeless Rocks in Space...
'Oh Charlton', Please let it be Written
Differently And Done Again More Naturally Please...
In The End of 'This Movie', Charlton Most Definitely
Falls to His Knees And Orates All Of His Human Failures...
Rod Serling, Narrator, of 'The Twilight Zone'; Writer
Of This Last Scene; Such A Real Modern
Prophet iNDeeD...
Other Than That
THere is 'This'
For Christians
Original
Before
And After
The Apple Again Fandom...
From the Gospel of Thomas; Not as
Adulterated From Centuries of Constant Revision...
37) His disciples said to him, "When will you be visible to us,
and when shall we behold you?"
He said, "When you strip naked without being ashamed, and
take your garments and put them under your feet like little
children and tread upon them, then you will see the child of the
Living, and you will not be afraid."
'Eve' Passed 'the Test' At The End of the Movie; She Never EveN
Had to Take It; 'Charlton, Miserably FailS AGAiN, On His Naked Knees;
Forgive Him, Raised Differently, in Books, He Knows Not What He Sees...
Or Even Breathes Naked Free...
Cold Dead
Hands
Living
Dead Still Then...
Statue of Liberty
Broken Like an Old Rusty Gun...
All i could Think of in the Movie, Even
At 8 Years Old then; is, i wanna Live With (Nova) Eve...
Close to A Free Beach Like That; YeS, A GArden
Of Eden Secluded In A Rural Area
Of A Forest BackYard Free
Surrounded By Trees
Even in Trump
Town USA
Works
Don't
Even Need
A Gun
As All
The Neighbors
Naturally Protect
me Armed to
The Hilt
In Automatic
Weaponized
Killing Machines
Hmm..
Oh
Wish...
Oh Wish Upon...
A Star You Do Come True...
Thanks All Left And Right For Providing This Avenue As Prepared Now;
This Mix of Dark and Light; This TWiLiGHT Heaven Forever Eternally Now..
It is
What
It is
If is to
Be We Do JusT Do IT NoW...
Yes, It is Up to me and You, Them, Us, And They We
Strikes And Gutter-balls; 10 Pins Fall... And Rise Again...
All the Egyptian And Greek Gods; Just Happy Again; All God,
WHere i Live
at least...
In This
Game
Play Am
i Do Create;
Just me, i am, ALL,
For ALL Those Who 'See' ALL iN ALL...
_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI
Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !
http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
NOVA on Intelligent Design |
19 Nov 2007, 1:53 am |
Intelligent Design: 'The Death of Science?' |
10 Oct 2005, 5:00 pm |
Wernher von Braun and Intelligent Design in the '70s |
23 Jul 2010, 10:29 am |
Is there any proof in favor of intelligent design? |
21 Sep 2015, 11:34 am |