Majority of Republicans Want Trump to Run Again
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
I wouldn't discount the role sexism played in the 2016 election. I strongly doubt most Americans care about "Wall Street", and Biden easily won 2020 and picked up a couple of red states even though he has a more conservative record than Clinton. I remember hearing this saying, the day a woman loses the job to a man vastly underqualified compared to her is just another Tuesday in America.
People viscerally dislike Hillary Clinton and it isn't all motivated by sexism.
Why the visceral hate, though? Women are historically seen as easy targets and scapegoats for people's anger.
_________________
What fresh hell is this?
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
I wouldn't discount the role sexism played in the 2016 election. I strongly doubt most Americans care about "Wall Street", and Biden easily won 2020 and picked up a couple of red states even though he has a more conservative record than Clinton. I remember hearing this saying, the day a woman loses the job to a man vastly underqualified compared to her is just another Tuesday in America.
People viscerally dislike Hillary Clinton and it isn't all motivated by sexism.
Why the visceral hate, though? Women are historically seen as easy targets and scapegoats for people's anger.
I wonder if people tweeted #lockherup because they were to lazy to tweet #getinthekitchenandmakemeasandwich
The_Walrus
Forum Moderator

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,081
Location: Reading, England
Fnord wrote:
In 2016, Five Thirty Eight gave President Trump a 29% chance of winning.
They are also owned by the ABC News network, which is owned by Disneycorp.
I would not trust any “Mickey-Mouse” polls.
They are also owned by the ABC News network, which is owned by Disneycorp.
I would not trust any “Mickey-Mouse” polls.
FiveThirtyEight isn’t a pollster. They primarily produce empirical models for elections.
They have an extremely good track record. When they say someone has a 1 in 3 chance of winning, then 1 in 3 times that candidate wins.
Trump winning despite FiveThirtyEight giving Clinton a 2 in 3 chance isn’t a sign that FiveThirtyEight’s model was wrong.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 37
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 16,999
Location: I'm right here
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
I wouldn't discount the role sexism played in the 2016 election. I strongly doubt most Americans care about "Wall Street", and Biden easily won 2020 and picked up a couple of red states even though he has a more conservative record than Clinton. I remember hearing this saying, the day a woman loses the job to a man vastly underqualified compared to her is just another Tuesday in America.
People viscerally dislike Hillary Clinton and it isn't all motivated by sexism.
Why the visceral hate, though? Women are historically seen as easy targets and scapegoats for people's anger.
You'd have to ask those people, but it's not just limited to far-right people. She isn't well liked among left-leaning Americans I've known either.
_________________
You can't buy happiness; steal it.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
I wouldn't discount the role sexism played in the 2016 election. I strongly doubt most Americans care about "Wall Street", and Biden easily won 2020 and picked up a couple of red states even though he has a more conservative record than Clinton. I remember hearing this saying, the day a woman loses the job to a man vastly underqualified compared to her is just another Tuesday in America.
People viscerally dislike Hillary Clinton and it isn't all motivated by sexism.
Why the visceral hate, though? Women are historically seen as easy targets and scapegoats for people's anger.
You'd have to ask those people, but it's not just limited to far-right people. She isn't well liked among left-leaning Americans I've known either.
Sexism is rampant among the left, too.
_________________
What fresh hell is this?
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
I wouldn't discount the role sexism played in the 2016 election. I strongly doubt most Americans care about "Wall Street", and Biden easily won 2020 and picked up a couple of red states even though he has a more conservative record than Clinton. I remember hearing this saying, the day a woman loses the job to a man vastly underqualified compared to her is just another Tuesday in America.
People viscerally dislike Hillary Clinton and it isn't all motivated by sexism.The only difference is how they are expressed, and what specific kinds of bigotry are acceptable.
_________________
Encyclopedia of American Loons: DONALD J. TRUMP
Link to a Timeline of DONALD TRUMP's COUP ATTEMPT
TRE45ON!!
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 37
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 16,999
Location: I'm right here
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
I wouldn't discount the role sexism played in the 2016 election. I strongly doubt most Americans care about "Wall Street", and Biden easily won 2020 and picked up a couple of red states even though he has a more conservative record than Clinton. I remember hearing this saying, the day a woman loses the job to a man vastly underqualified compared to her is just another Tuesday in America.
People viscerally dislike Hillary Clinton and it isn't all motivated by sexism.
Why the visceral hate, though? Women are historically seen as easy targets and scapegoats for people's anger.
You'd have to ask those people, but it's not just limited to far-right people. She isn't well liked among left-leaning Americans I've known either.
Sexism is rampant among the left, too.
It's more than just sexism, she's a condescending and smug neo-liberal who makes younger progressives and leftists cringe.
_________________
You can't buy happiness; steal it.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
I wouldn't discount the role sexism played in the 2016 election. I strongly doubt most Americans care about "Wall Street", and Biden easily won 2020 and picked up a couple of red states even though he has a more conservative record than Clinton. I remember hearing this saying, the day a woman loses the job to a man vastly underqualified compared to her is just another Tuesday in America.
People viscerally dislike Hillary Clinton and it isn't all motivated by sexism.
Why the visceral hate, though? Women are historically seen as easy targets and scapegoats for people's anger.
You'd have to ask those people, but it's not just limited to far-right people. She isn't well liked among left-leaning Americans I've known either.
Sexism is rampant among the left, too.
It's more than just sexism, she's a condescending and smug neo-liberal who makes younger progressives and leftists cringe.
I find politicians like Bernie Sanders very condescending and smug, yet he is wildly popular among the left.

_________________
What fresh hell is this?
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 37
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 16,999
Location: I'm right here
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
I wouldn't discount the role sexism played in the 2016 election. I strongly doubt most Americans care about "Wall Street", and Biden easily won 2020 and picked up a couple of red states even though he has a more conservative record than Clinton. I remember hearing this saying, the day a woman loses the job to a man vastly underqualified compared to her is just another Tuesday in America.
People viscerally dislike Hillary Clinton and it isn't all motivated by sexism.
Why the visceral hate, though? Women are historically seen as easy targets and scapegoats for people's anger.
You'd have to ask those people, but it's not just limited to far-right people. She isn't well liked among left-leaning Americans I've known either.
Sexism is rampant among the left, too.
It's more than just sexism, she's a condescending and smug neo-liberal who makes younger progressives and leftists cringe.
I find politicians like Bernie Sanders very condescending and smug, yet he is wildly popular among the left. And neoliberal gets used so much now, it's lost its meaning.
Not if you're familiar with it's meaning. Establishment Democrats have very similar economic ideals as Reaganites, they're not progressives and they're certainly not on the left so why would leftists want to support them? One would expect leftists to be critical of their opponents.
_________________
You can't buy happiness; steal it.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Descartes wrote:
I wouldn't discount the role sexism played in the 2016 election. I strongly doubt most Americans care about "Wall Street", and Biden easily won 2020 and picked up a couple of red states even though he has a more conservative record than Clinton. I remember hearing this saying, the day a woman loses the job to a man vastly underqualified compared to her is just another Tuesday in America.
People viscerally dislike Hillary Clinton and it isn't all motivated by sexism.
Why the visceral hate, though? Women are historically seen as easy targets and scapegoats for people's anger.
You'd have to ask those people, but it's not just limited to far-right people. She isn't well liked among left-leaning Americans I've known either.
Sexism is rampant among the left, too.
It's more than just sexism, she's a condescending and smug neo-liberal who makes younger progressives and leftists cringe.
I find politicians like Bernie Sanders very condescending and smug, yet he is wildly popular among the left. And neoliberal gets used so much now, it's lost its meaning.
Not if you're familiar with it's meaning. Establishment Democrats have very similar economic ideals as Reaganites, they're not progressives and they're certainly not on the left so why would leftists want to support them? One would expect leftists to be critical of their opponents.
What establishment Democrats are we talking about? The party as a whole has been drifting more and more to the left in recent decades on both economic and social issues.
Being critical of a politician is one thing. Acting as though both candidates were the same, which many leftists said about Clinton and Trump, is frankly bulls**t.
_________________
What fresh hell is this?
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 37
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 16,999
Location: I'm right here
Descartes wrote:
What establishment Democrats are we talking about? The party as a whole has been drifting more and more to the left in recent decades on both economic and social issues.
Being critical of a politician is one thing. Acting as though both candidates were the same, which many leftists said about Clinton and Trump, is frankly bulls**t.
Being critical of a politician is one thing. Acting as though both candidates were the same, which many leftists said about Clinton and Trump, is frankly bulls**t.
By drifting to the left you mean they now have a handful of token progressives and that they will take a stand on social issues so long as they never need to give any attention to economic concerns? They're not the same as Trump, but they're the same as Mitt Romney only with better social policies and they count on that to be enough to make left-wing voters support them. They don't deserve the left's support because they are hostile to earning it.
_________________
You can't buy happiness; steal it.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
Most Any Person With Common Sense And
Yes A Smidgen of Emotional Intelligence
Should Be Able to See That Trump
Is A Most Despicable Leader Now
We've 'Entertained' in the United
States; So, Why in the World Will
78 Percent of Republicans Support
Him as President Again After ALL the Horrible,
Dangerous, Deadly, And Anti-Democracy Stuff
He Has Done As Empirically Measurable As Frigging
'Insanely' Extreme
By Any
Measure
of Common
Sense, Rationality,
And Emotional Intelligence That's Real...
For me at least, It's A Religious Issue at
Core That Drives the "Masses" That Are
UNDERNEATH His Undying Minion Despicable Leader Support;
To Put IT in Religious Terms That Are NoT "Politically Correct"; Out of; And In, Trump's Evangelical Base:
'God' Is Freedom of Love’s Will With Least Harm; Theocracy Is Control Over What Penises/Vaginas Do...
It's 'Douched'
With Toxic
Patriarchy InDeed...
And of Course THere Are
Followers of 'That Religion', Male and Female too...
Yes, Yes, An Overgeneralization And Of Course No,
We Cannot Hope to Take Penises and Vaginas Out
of the Theocratic Equation; Yet Wait! Science Shows
That Testosterone And Sperm Count Has Fallen Up
To 50 Percent, About 1 Percent A Year in the Last
50 Years or so; So in Another 50 Years or so the
Rest of Nature
Won't Have
To Worry About
Theocracy That Insists
We Spread the Earth With
More of Us And Dominate
The Rest of Nature like a Big "D" Head...
Hehe, "D" Stands for Donald of Course too; HAha..

_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI
Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !
http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Macron loses absolute majority in parliament |
20 Jun 2022, 9:01 am |
Hezbollah and its allies losing parliament majority. |
20 May 2022, 2:55 am |
The ‘Putin Is Bad, But’ Republicans |
03 Apr 2022, 4:38 pm |
Texas Republicans go uber right wing |
26 Jun 2022, 3:52 pm |