Matthew in series about Jesus written in Autistic

Post Reply New Topic

I actually feel like Jesus was an earnest person who probably had a strict moral sense, combined with a very healthy sense of Himself as superior to most other people.

I don't sense that He would have been able to foment a rebellion that would have had any impact upon Roman suzerainty in the Roman province where Jesus resided. The Crucifixion, I believe, placed Jesus on a higher plane than the Romans intended.

It's really a fascinating thing that Christianity has survived to the present day. How this was so, of course, is a ripe inspiration for scholarship and speculation.

^ also an indication that He was exactly who he said He was. As described in the Bible.
There were lots of other leaders who died and their causes died with them.

But this thread is supposed to be about the TV series "The Chosen", and the character of Matthew.

So go watch it and see what you think. Decide for yourself if you like Matthew as depicted or not.

If you want to debate the person of Jesus or the history of the Bible go here:

● wrongplanet.net - Politics, Philosophy, And Religion

I was actually DEFENDING Jesus

Of course, it's always good to watch the film to form a proper impression of a portrayal.

All I was doing was going against the notion that Jesus was crazy.

If a person goes around saying that they are the son of God, that people need to follow them to be saved, and have visions with Satan on mountaintops, they will probably be considered crazy.

Being mentally ill says nothing about a person’s MORAL attributes. You can still be a good person if you have a psychotic mental illness.

With all that being said, we only have 3rd hand accounts of Jesus. He does not speak directly for himself anywhere.

He might have been considered crazy today.....but I don't believe he would have been considered crazy then.

The Romans seemed to think that He was, as the expression goes, "crazy like a fox," meaning that a person is not as "crazy" as he/she seems to be----rather, that the person is clever, perhaps dangerous.

I'm a person who would love to see a portrayal of Jesus' life as (as)reflective of the actual history of Jesus and his time as possible. Perhaps I'm overly a "stickler" for this. It's okay if there are "alternate" portrayals----like that of Henry VIII in "The Tudors"---but I don't feel immense satisfaction in this.

I don't disagree there.

I guess I'm veering away from the topic a bit----and I apologize for that---but it was already "veered" before I even commented.

In my heart, I wish there was a "Heaven," and that there was a situation where I am assured of Eternal Life. I will only believe in a Supreme Being should my mother contact me from Heaven.

Other people who have faith in Jesus, or whoever, I have no argument with, as long they don't do anything harmful to me in the name of their religion.

It’s difficult to say what the historical Jesus was like since we are short on evidence.