Ah, yet more sanity from Hamas...

Post Reply New Topic

How so? Evil is subjective. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, as exibited here. You may not agree with it, as I do not agree with Naziism's ideas but I can't call it "evil".

If you don't think that Nazism is bad, then you don't know very well about it. You should inform yourself better about it (or better even, visit Ausschwitz or Dachau some day) and think about if you still would say that "evil is subjective" (how's that? If you do nothing to me and I terribly torture you and kill you or/and your family then you find it impossible to say who's the evil one? really?!) if you had lived here in Germany at the time of 1933 to 1945, though mind you, unfortunately you wouldn't have a chance to say what you think then, as the Nazis didn't think that an autistic's life was really that much worth living, you know...
Now, communism is a different thing, at least good in theory, but still, saying that an ideology is bad is not the same as saying that a whole people is bad (which, aside from being racist of course, implies that all people who for example are Jewish or Muslim or black or white and so on did and thought the same thing, which is obviously not the case).

Also, the comics and the like said all Nazis and all Communists were "evil"



in WWI "Hang the Hun" was a popular children's game.

Well, I can only care about what wrong things happen during the time I live. Probably also kids in ancient Rome learned bad things about the Gauls when Julius Caesar fought them. I'm not saying that only for the Arabs it's not ok to incite their children or that they were the only ones who did it, when any other country did/does it I find/would find it just as bad.



like drummer boys in the American Civil War?

I agree with LPP; I think saying children abused as weapons of war are guilty is like saying that a raped child is promiscous. This does not negate your right to defend yourself from kamikaze children.

The insults that came out are simply because I disrespect your way of thinking and not because of any inability to reason. Don't overthink about them, I just can't stand people like you ...simple.

When he launches some nukes at Israel?

EDIT: assuming Iran is building nuclear weapons, which it abandoned its weapons program in 2003.

By the same token you call Palestinian snipers cowards I could call Israeli assassins cowards.

ragtime, the US military does not fight LA gangs, the police does; the Israeli military does fight Hamas and similar groups. An armed conflict openly and directly involving the armed forces of a de facto government (Hamas) and the military of a sovereign state (Israel) is a war. It is not a total war, to be sure; neither is the war in Iraq, or the one in Afghanistan; these are limited wars. Just because Israel isn't using nukes on Gaza doesn't mean it's not a war.
The 'rules of engagement' are relevant to war crimes tribunals, but not to defining whether it is a war or not. Did the Romans never go to war? Their rule was 'leges silent inter armas,' the laws are silent in time of war, i.e. in ware verything is allowed. Did WWII stop being a war when Hitler ordered that all the people of Leningrad were to be all massacred, even if they surrendered, which is surely against all rules of engagement?
I agree with LPP; I think saying children abused as weapons of war are guilty is like saying that a raped child is promiscous. This does not negate your right to defend yourself from kamikaze children.

This does not negate your right to defend yourself from kamikaze children.

So it's not anger, it's hate.