Industrial Society Destroys Mind and Environment

Page 1 of 14 [ 220 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next

Haliphron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,980

31 Aug 2008, 3:56 pm

Disconnect yourself from the Matrix(which is "destroying the planet" since it makes use of continuous electricity),
and then go back to your little Kibbutz, live the simple life, and spare the rest of us on WP your Bullsh1t you ignorant hippie fa***t :lol: :D :wink:



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Aug 2008, 3:57 pm

pbcoll wrote:
They are analogous to those that sing the praises of a world communist revolution while sipping champagne.

Gotta love the champagne socialists.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


pezar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,432

31 Aug 2008, 8:10 pm

pbcoll wrote:
Would those whining about the evils of the modern world prefer to die of bubonic plague (now curable), rabies (preventable), smallpox (eradicated thanks to vaccines), leprosy (curable), etc? Preindustrial life was (and still is, in some parts of the world) brutal, hungry, violent and usually short, whether you like these facts or not. Frankly, I don't see how anybody that knows anything about the Middle Ages would think the modern era is less mentally healthy. I'll have science over burning people alive to appease angry gods any day (but I do admit human sacrifice must be a heck of a lot more emotional than science).
Of course, the people that claim to hate the industrial world so much could simply move to the more remote parts of Africa or Afghanistan instead of whining about it on the internet (not the most preindustrial of mediums). They are analogous to those that sing the praises of a world communist revolution while sipping champagne.
Anybody who thinks that preindustrial societies were eco-friendly ought to look up 'roza y quema,' the history of Easter Island, etc. Environmental damage was usually modest because famine, war and plagues kept the population tiny compared to what it is now.


The only problem with curing "disease" is that the diseases were an important population control mechanism. Without regular plagues to clean out the population, the number of humans has raced far ahead of what the planet can support. It's getting to the point where we can no longer genetically manipulate agriculture to solve the problem.

Here in California, forest fires were a regular feature of the cycle of the forest for millenia. They cleared out the underbrush and allowed the sturdy trees to thrive, which in turn supported an ecosystem. But when whites came along, they decided fire was "bad" so they suppressed it. All of it. So for a century the underbrush grew and grew, until now when there's a fire, the whole forest goes up in a tremendous wall of flame, and the end result resembles Hiroshima. In places where humans have been unable to replant trees, such as the Martis drainage visible above Floriston, California, off Interstate 80, the formerly rich forest has turned into a desert, with small shrubs growing where centuries old pines once stood.

I think that we will find that plagues served the same purpose among humans, clearing out dead wood. We've suppressed them for so long that when a virulent plague pops up that we can't control, and it will, billions will die, and the secondary diseases caused by rotting bodies may wipe out the rest of humanity. If any humans survive, they would likely return, or try to return, to hunter gatherer or crude agricultural society. The situation is so dire that virus response teams are jumping on any outbreak of anything anywhere lest it get out of hand. The unnatural places are the vast urban shantytowns where most of humanity lives.

So in that case, yeah, I would be willing to die of a plague if it meant a stronger humanity. Nature doesn't care about the individual, but the group. Individuals are disposable; survival of the species is paramount. Unless humanity adopts this way of thinking, we're toast. As for escaping civilization, I do plan on buying remote land where I can live a relatively simple existence. Someday. I don't have the money now. I don't think it's 100% possible to totally escape civilization, something that led the Unabomber to go on his rampage.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm

@Pezar: So you have never sought medical attention when you were sick? Never taken antibiotics? Never been vaccinated against deadly illnesses? Refused to vaccinate your children?

My response to people who say the world is overpopulated and people should die to keep the population down is always the same: You first. As far as I know, none has yet accepted that challenge to save the planet.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


pbcoll
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,892
Location: the City of Palaces

31 Aug 2008, 8:31 pm

pezar wrote:
pbcoll wrote:
Would those whining about the evils of the modern world prefer to die of bubonic plague (now curable), rabies (preventable), smallpox (eradicated thanks to vaccines), leprosy (curable), etc? Preindustrial life was (and still is, in some parts of the world) brutal, hungry, violent and usually short, whether you like these facts or not. Frankly, I don't see how anybody that knows anything about the Middle Ages would think the modern era is less mentally healthy. I'll have science over burning people alive to appease angry gods any day (but I do admit human sacrifice must be a heck of a lot more emotional than science).
Of course, the people that claim to hate the industrial world so much could simply move to the more remote parts of Africa or Afghanistan instead of whining about it on the internet (not the most preindustrial of mediums). They are analogous to those that sing the praises of a world communist revolution while sipping champagne.
Anybody who thinks that preindustrial societies were eco-friendly ought to look up 'roza y quema,' the history of Easter Island, etc. Environmental damage was usually modest because famine, war and plagues kept the population tiny compared to what it is now.


The only problem with curing "disease" is that the diseases were an important population control mechanism. Without regular plagues to clean out the population, the number of humans has raced far ahead of what the planet can support. It's getting to the point where we can no longer genetically manipulate agriculture to solve the problem.

Here in California, forest fires were a regular feature of the cycle of the forest for millenia. They cleared out the underbrush and allowed the sturdy trees to thrive, which in turn supported an ecosystem. But when whites came along, they decided fire was "bad" so they suppressed it. All of it. So for a century the underbrush grew and grew, until now when there's a fire, the whole forest goes up in a tremendous wall of flame, and the end result resembles Hiroshima. In places where humans have been unable to replant trees, such as the Martis drainage visible above Floriston, California, off Interstate 80, the formerly rich forest has turned into a desert, with small shrubs growing where centuries old pines once stood.

I think that we will find that plagues served the same purpose among humans, clearing out dead wood. We've suppressed them for so long that when a virulent plague pops up that we can't control, and it will, billions will die, and the secondary diseases caused by rotting bodies may wipe out the rest of humanity. If any humans survive, they would likely return, or try to return, to hunter gatherer or crude agricultural society. The situation is so dire that virus response teams are jumping on any outbreak of anything anywhere lest it get out of hand. The unnatural places are the vast urban shantytowns where most of humanity lives.

So in that case, yeah, I would be willing to die of a plague if it meant a stronger humanity. Nature doesn't care about the individual, but the group. Individuals are disposable; survival of the species is paramount. Unless humanity adopts this way of thinking, we're toast. As for escaping civilization, I do plan on buying remote land where I can live a relatively simple existence. Someday. I don't have the money now. I don't think it's 100% possible to totally escape civilization, something that led the Unabomber to go on his rampage.


Or we could just drastically lower the birthrate by means of contraception, as China does by diktat, and the Italians, Spaniards, Japanese and Koreans do of their own free will. World population growth is slowing down, in fact. If you wish to die of plague, be my guest, but frankly I'm guessing that, like most people, you'd be desperate for a cure if it came to that.
You're dead wrong on 'Nature doesn't care about the individual, but the group' - biologically, your genes' survival is the only thing that matters, not the rest of your species; from an evolutionary point of view, it's fine to sacrifice for your descendants and close relatives, but the rest of the species has no inherent value.


_________________
I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)

El hombre es una bestia famélica, envidiosa e insaciable. (Francisco Tario)

I'm male by the way (yes, I know my avatar is misleading).


sushil_yadav
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 29 Aug 2008
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 30
Location: India

31 Aug 2008, 9:11 pm

pezar wrote:
This seems like Unabomber Ted Kaczsynski's basic argument, that modern society is making us all crazy.


ManErg wrote:
What I'd like to add is the idea of a massive 'feedback loop' going on. Our damaged minds make the damaged world that damages us even further...and so it goes. The industrial world couldn't have been made by healthy, sane minds, could it? So what initially threw our thinking off so much that we thought it would be a good idea to work in offices and factories to buy the gadgets we need to program us into accepting the power-possessers view of the world?


Averick wrote:
I think you are right about consumerism; it's an empty persuit. Too bad it's all some live for.


slowmutant wrote:
Consumerism is not good. It's a way of life that is cannibalistic.


pezar wrote:
Unless humanity adopts this way of thinking, we're toast.



Chief Seattle of the "Indian Tribe" had given a prophetic warning to the consumerist western civilization way back in 1854.


Only after the last tree has been cut down
Only after the last river has been poisoned
Only after the last fish has been caught
Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten



sushil_yadav



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

31 Aug 2008, 9:29 pm

sushil_yadav wrote:

Chief Seattle of the "Indian Tribe" had given a prophetic warning to the consumerist western civilization way back in 1854.


Only after the last tree has been cut down
Only after the last river has been poisoned
Only after the last fish has been caught
Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten



sushil_yadav

I don't see how that is a great warning. I mean, everyone knows that money cannot be eaten, money is only a means of exchange for things that cannot be eaten. When the price of things that get eaten go up, then producers attempt to produce more based upon their desire for money. I think that the major issue isn't whether or not money can be eaten, but rather the efficacy of market allocation of food resources, and perhaps also how governmental changes impact the efficacy of food resource allocation. I think that the latter results in more intensive use of fertilizer than is desirable to be honest.



chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

31 Aug 2008, 9:49 pm

sushil_yadav wrote:
Chief Seattle of the "Indian Tribe" had given a prophetic warning to the consumerist western civilization way back in 1854.


Only after the last tree has been cut down
Only after the last river has been poisoned
Only after the last fish has been caught
Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten



Raw human flesh can be eaten


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Aug 2008, 9:51 pm

sushil_yadav wrote:
Chief Seattle of the "Indian Tribe" had given a prophetic warning to the consumerist western civilization way back in 1854.


Only after the last tree has been cut down
Only after the last river has been poisoned
Only after the last fish has been caught
Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten



sushil_yadav

Yes, let's idolize the past as though it were some kind of utopia. If you feel so strongly about it, why are you using a consumerist device like a computer?


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

31 Aug 2008, 9:53 pm

chever wrote:

Raw human flesh can be eaten

Yes, and allocated using money!



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

31 Aug 2008, 9:55 pm

Let's go back to the good old days when the life expectancy was 25 years.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm

twoshots wrote:
Let's go back to the good old days when the life expectancy was 25 years.

Ah, for the good old days.

No running water.

No A/C or heating.

Fresh fruit only at certain times of the year.

Fresh meat almost impossible to obtain, and very expensive.

No medicine.

No libraries or books, but that doesn't matter if there's only 2% literacy.

No travel more than a few miles because there are no cars or roads.

Or, we don't have to be so extreme about it. After all, we could be living in an Amish paradise! [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsfVw9xxoNY[/youtube]


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

31 Aug 2008, 10:12 pm

Orwell wrote:
No travel more than a few miles because there are no cars or roads.


It would take only a month for me to travel from Jordan Minnesota to Denton Texas on foot.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Orwell wrote:
No travel more than a few miles because there are no cars or roads.


It would take only a month for me to travel from Jordan Minnesota to Denton Texas on foot.

Only a month. Well, that makes it rather difficult.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


ShawnWilliam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,462

31 Aug 2008, 10:14 pm

While I do not have the attention span to read all of that, from the random peices I read I fully agree with it.


Let us not forget about the Underground lifestyl that has randomly emerged in the recent years.. this underground lifestyle is only possible with implemented funding by the wrong people, your government.. the government invented the underground lifestyle that kids love to live these days.. it keeps them stupid, ignorant, content and lets them go off onto their own adventure of sex, drugs rock-n-roll, and the thrill of evading police.. its cat and mouse on a bigger scale.



chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

31 Aug 2008, 10:23 pm

ShawnWilliam wrote:
Let us not forget about the Underground lifestyl that has randomly emerged in the recent years.. this underground lifestyle is only possible with implemented funding by the wrong people, your government.. the government invented the underground lifestyle that kids love to live these days..


Really? I can't believe that they invented the vacuous hipster lifestyle.


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"