Veganism/Vegetarianism
I had a phase where I was vegan for a while, but I stopped the diet after several months as I grew pale and had a cyst grow on my neck. So I stopped the diet and and started drinking milk and eating eggs, and eventually chicken again. Some, less fortunate than me, have carried on the diet for years and developed degeneration of joints and heart tissues as I've come to find out. Soy is also toxic when not fermented. It has phyto-toxins in it that actually destroy essential enzymes within the body. This isn't good news for someone with a diet that's already lean on certain nutrients that aren't readily available from plant sources. I do believe veganism may be useful as a fasting method for people who want to drop weight, but it shouldn't be practiced as a long term diet. Just as you wanna start eating fat again after lint is over, you should start eating, at least eggs, after a couple of months. I even made sure to get all the right nutrients.
I think there's almost something Gnostic about the vegan diet. They see something inherently wrong in the order of the food chain and the cosmos. So, in protest of it, they completely contradict it, just as Gnostics intentionally didn't procreate to keep spirit from being imprisoned within the injust and cruel disposition of the human condition.
I'd also call it a very neuro-centric worldview, because the notion is that the only beings that suffer and feel pain from death are life forms that possess a brain. It could just as well be that a pine tree or a lettuce plant suffers in some way from being cut down and devoured. Suffering may be a state that all beings, plant or animal, go through on their way to the grave. Everything we eat should be treated with reverence and blessing and the way we attain it, because one day when we die, our bodies will begin a process in which they will eventually become nourishment for fungi, worms, bacteria, plants, animals, people, etc, etc. Our whole being will be re-absorbed into the womb of our cosmic mother to be reborn and transmuted into other forms.
I've known a few people who were healthier on the vegan diet, but very few. Everybody's system is a little different.
I'm actually missing several enzymes needed to digest plants, so I'm biologically a carnivore. At the opposite end of the spectrum, one of my friend's friends is actually allergic to animal proteins, so he has to be a vegan.
Most people are somewhere in between.
I can understand todays aversion to eating meats, and not wanting to hard animals. Most of us today live far away from farms and livestock. But recall this article written by a former vegan. Her health was badly effected by the diet - plus what was interesting to me was how she came to realize that even though she thought she was not harming animals eating the way she was, when looking at the whole view of how her food was created, came to realize animals were being displaced and killed.
"The Vegetarian Myth"
http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/ ... rian-myth/
excerpt from the article:
"...She then explains why living without killing is impossible, beginning with a fascinating, detailed description of the cycle of life … and “cycle” is the crucial concept. There is no food chain, with humans sitting at the top. We are members of a food cycle, with all of us eating each other. As Keith explains, even the soil is alive, with literally millions of organisms in each tablespoon. Take the animals out of the equation — along with the urine, feces, blood and bone that the soil “eats” — and the soil will die.
Keith discovered this for herself when she decided to grow her own food. She soon learned that her soil required nitrogen, and discovered to her horror that she had two choices: natural nitrogen — mostly blood meal and bone meal — or synthetic nitrogen made from fossil fuels … another form of dead animals. As she reluctantly concluded, “My garden wanted to eat animals, even if I didn’t.”
Her garden gave her further fits when she realized she had to stop the bugs from eating the plants she planned to eat herself. Chemical pesticides were obviously out, so she looked into “natural” pesticides — which she learned rip the guts out of the bugs. She finally elected to keep some chickens that would eat the bugs instead. Yes, she knew was simply outsourcing the killing to the chickens, and yes, she struggled with the double-standard. Her personal odyssey, sprinkled throughout the pages, is at times equally funny and sad.
Much of the Moral Vegetarians section describes the killing fields of mono-crop agriculture. Never mind the countless critters shredded by farm machinery. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. The real damage occurs earlier in the process. To create those sprawling acres of wheat, corn, and soybeans, prairies and forests that were home to millions of animals are destroyed, taking the animals down with them. Rivers are dammed, killing all the animals who depended on them. That soy burger Mr. Granola chews so smugly requires at least as many deaths as my steak, if not more...."
The problem with veganism/vegetarianism is it doesn't involve steak
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Eh... how?
Is it that they are not bred under horrible circumstances only to be slaughtered? I pity the animals who miss out on this.
Sorry about the sarcasm, I just don´t see any logic in your statement.
Truly horrible circumstances.
Pound for pound, more land is required to grow crops than to rear animals used for meat production. To use arable land, you must first cut down trees and destroy the local ecosystem, killing the animals that live in the ecosystem.
To put this into perspective, if the entire population of Australia turned vegan an additional area of land equal to the size of the states of Victoria and Tasmania combined would be needed to satisfy food requirements. How many animals do you think that's going to put to death?
Then there's the issue of rats, rabbits and what-not that live in the crop fields being ground up by the combines during harvest.
Here, why don't you read this.
Truly horrible circumstances.
I was thinking more in the line of this
But to feed the animals until maturity you need to grow an amount of crops larger than what would equal the food value of the meat that you get from the animals.
True, but the same goes for meat production, and on a bigger scale. Link
[...]
Raising animals for human consumption accounts for approximately 40% of the total amount of agricultural output in industrialized countries today and livestock is the world’s largest land user. Grazing occupies 26% of the Earth’s surface, and feed crop production uses about one third of all arable land.
Because of this enormous requirement for land use, land degradation such as deforestation, desertification, and soil quality decline, which are already major global problems, are becoming more significant. Grazing land expansion for livestock is a major factor in deforestation, especially in Latin America. Approximately 70% of previously forested land in the Amazon is now used as pasture, while feed crops cover a large part of the remaining 30%. As much as 70% of grazing land is considered degraded due to overgrazing, compaction and erosion related to livestock activity. Extended heavy grazing also contributes to the disappearance of edible plant species, and the successive overgrowth of other inedible plants and bushes
artrat
Veteran
Joined: 6 Nov 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,269
Location: The Butthole of the American Empire
Meat is a vital part of the human diet. You can get protein in soy but it can't replace meat.
We are part of the food chain which involves eating meat. If you refuse to eat meat then somebody else will.
_________________
?During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" ~George Orwell
"I belive in God, only I spell it Nature."
~ Frank Llyod Wright
I was vegetarian for a couple of years because I realised you could be perfectly healthy without eating meat and I couldn't really afford meat at the time, anyway. It was also due to some vague concerns about animal rights and CO2 emissions for livestock farming.
If you have a half-decent knowledge of nutrition, vegetarianism is a healthy, inexpensive diet. I would still be a vegetarian if I didn't really, really, really like the taste of meat (I used to miss it all the time when I was veggie).
I think veganism is unhealthy as a long-term diet. I know a couple of people who've done it for a number of years, but one of them accidentally eats dairy all the time (they keep eating take-away curries cooked in ghee). The other one, I suspect, is some kind of superhuman.
_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.