psych wrote:
does the morning after pill count as abortion? i mean in the moral-political sense
depends on who you ask. There are, as I have meantioned in other threads, even pharmasists and doctors that REFUSE to fill or perscribe birth control pills because IF an egg was fertilized then it MIGHT be aborted by the body when the woman starts her peroid at the end of the pill pack. THAT, in my opnion, is a step back to the dark ages. Women have a right to BIRTH CONTROL. Pregnancy Preventions should be covered by insurance (most companies dont), after viagra is covered..... DOUBLE STANDARD
the morning after pill, if used properly is not technally abortion. it can take up to 72 hours for the egg to be fertilized after the initial, uhmmm, introduction of male cells. Many pregnancies are absorbed by the body, spontaniously aborted, or whatever NATURALLY by the female body many times before the female even knows or suspects she is pregnate.
Personally, I feel that after, say, three months, abortion should be limited to special cirmstances (rape, insest, medical issues, etc) and the it should NEVER EVER be used to select gender!! !! I think after the fetus is able to survive outside the womb, then abortion should not occor. At that point, the fetus could be removed (if health reasons require) and could, with medical assistance survive. Partial-birth abortions, in my opinion, should not be an option. If the mother is in that kind of danger, then a C section could be done to remove the baby.
As far as unwanted babies, well adoption is an option. BUT they should make it more affordable, and set reasonable limitations. for example, If a woman is overweight, she CAN be rejected as an adoption applicant. Same goes if she has a "dangerous" occupation. I dont care for that limitation