Fnord wrote:
While his his anti-vaccine stance and death by covid make him eligible for a Darwin Award, his successful fathering of a child beforehand negates his eligibility.
You should double-check that.
Quote:
The existence of offspring, though potentially deleterious to the gene pool, does not disqualify a nominee. Children inherit only half of each parent's genetic material and thus have their own chance to survive or snuff themselves. If, for instance, the offspring has inherited the "Play With Combustibles" gene, but also has inherited the "Use Caution When..." gene, then she is a potential innovator and asset to the human race. Therefore, each nominee is judged based on whether or not she has removed her own genes, without consideration to the number of offspring or, in the case of an elderly winner, the likelihood of producing more offspring.
https://darwinawards.com/rules/rules1.htmlI used to be obsessed with these as a kid.
On-topic, I don't have a small enough fiddle for this occasion.
_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う