Shots Fired At Trump Rally
Absolutely nothing about this story makes sense. I am not here to support/endorse trump, nor am I really into conspiracy theories normally. But... There are multiple videos now, from multiple angles, showing:
1. The Secret Service sniper that killed the assassin was watching him through the scope of his gun for quite a while before any shots were fired. When the first shot was fired, he jumps slightly (can't blame him) and then returns fire without turning his own gun at all. It was clearly already aimed at the target, so he knew the target was there. Why the delay? Was he waiting for permission to take the shot? Nervous about killing a man? Ok fine, but in that case why weren't the foot agents beside Trump doing anything to get him off stage?
2. The crowd knew there was a guy with a gun on the roof. Lots of people in the crowd were screaming at the cops and pointing. Some witnesses said this was going on for 5-7 minutes before any shots. And the SS made no attempt to get him off stage.
A lot of other rumours are flying now, with no hard evidence... but the videos of the above points seem pretty damning. Something is not right. I don't buy the official story.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,538
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Jurisdiction and rules of engagement are likely factors in this.
If you shoot someone with what turns out to be an umbrella you've probably just ruined your career in the SS.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
auntblabby
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,800
Location: the island of defective toy santas
Apparently the local gun club rejected his application to join because he couldn't shoot straight. In a weird way that decision may have forever changed the course of world history.
reminds me of hitler's rejection by an art school.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,538
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Apparently the local gun club rejected his application to join because he couldn't shoot straight. In a weird way that decision may have forever changed the course of world history.
reminds me of hitler's rejection by an art school.
All except Hitler was a competent painter.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
auntblabby
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,800
Location: the island of defective toy santas
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,538
Location: Right over your left shoulder
All except Hitler was a competent painter.
am not an art expert myself, but multiple artists i've known over the years have told me that he was a mediocre painter with a skewed sense of perspective.
I can't say I'd include a skewed sense of perspective among what I'd consider informed takes.
Usually the criticisms I've encountered are more along the lines of:
They are architect's sketches: painful and precise draftsmanship; nothing more. No wonder the Vienna professors told him to go to an architectural school and give up pure art as hopeless
And: One modern art critic was asked in 2002 to review some of Hitler's paintings without being told who painted them. He said they were quite good, but that the different style in which he drew human figures represented a profound lack of interest in people.
But, why quote other people when we both have eyes:




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paintings_by_Adolf_Hitler
You know how some paintings have meaning? What I see here is someone who'd respond to a question about what does the painting mean to him as an artist with hvat'duyewmean? It's *info dump about the building's history* and never be able to offer an actual answer to the question that was asked.
I'd say he understands perspective fairly well, but seems to mechanically reproduce landscapes and buildings.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
If his father had money he could have trained as an architect. His close relationship with Albert Speer and Leni Rifenstahl suggest he maintained his personal interest in art/design.
Interesting, I would have thought a Sniper could disarm with an accurate shot without killing,
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
All except Hitler was a competent painter.
am not an art expert myself, but multiple artists i've known over the years have told me that he was a mediocre painter with a skewed sense of perspective.
I can't say I'd include a skewed sense of perspective among what I'd consider informed takes.
Usually the criticisms I've encountered are more along the lines of:
They are architect's sketches: painful and precise draftsmanship; nothing more. No wonder the Vienna professors told him to go to an architectural school and give up pure art as hopeless
And: One modern art critic was asked in 2002 to review some of Hitler's paintings without being told who painted them. He said they were quite good, but that the different style in which he drew human figures represented a profound lack of interest in people.
But, why quote other people when we both have eyes:




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paintings_by_Adolf_Hitler
You know how some paintings have meaning? What I see here is someone who'd respond to a question about what does the painting mean to him as an artist with hvat'duyewmean? It's *info dump about the building's history* and never be able to offer an actual answer to the question that was asked.
I'd say he understands perspective fairly well, but seems to mechanically reproduce landscapes and buildings.
Not to get off track, but regarding Hitler:
While he wasn't a bad painter, he refused to get with the times, which was all about experimentation with Dadaism, Cubism, and Surrealism. He figured if the art schools didn't like his paintings, which were more classical and from another time, they could go pound salt. Well, no, they just didn't have to enroll him. Small wonder he had the kind of art he refused to even consider labeled Degenerate Art.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Jurisdiction and rules of engagement are likely factors in this.
If you shoot someone with what turns out to be an umbrella you've probably just ruined your career in the SS.
Have found rules of engagement are generally used as a cover up for murder of one type or another .
Especially regarding a Presidential person. Believe Presidential security is Paramount in this country . Have seen
much lower level law enforcement fabricate circumstances to justify a homicide "1st hand " .
The incompitency level of the secret service in this issue . imho . was planned . These folks are trained to act at the least hint of threat, as I understand it.


And why is this pattern of evidence not getting any media attention?????
_________________
Diagnosed hfa
Loves velcro,
ASPartOfMe
Veteran

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,085
Location: Long Island, New York
A Secret Service f**kup that I do not believe has been brought up here but I have seen others note. When they picked up Trump they should have taking him out via the back. The way they carried him to the ambulance left him vulnerable to a potential second shooter.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
20 small fish. If it had been Biden speaking there and then he woulda shot Biden. Like the Columbine Shooters he just wanted to commit suicide and take out others with him in a blaze of glory. Ideology likely had little or nothing to do with it.
I think Kraichie is suggesting after taking out trump he might have targetted his bullies (had he survived). Weird thing is , his school bullies can thank their lucky stars trump came to town, otherwise their goose was cooked.
So you're a psychic who can read K's mind?
This was not a Hollywood movie. Its real life. Real life doesnt work that way.
In real life if you gun for a POTUS, or a potential future POTUS, you're dead meat. Either they instantly kill you on the scene (as per Crooks) or they instantly grab you alive (like Hinckley )...in which case you're still in for a life time of time (Hinckley was lucky enough to get soft time in the looney bin but he was still doing life).
In a Hollywood movie you could plug the future president, and THEN have time to hunt down each of your high school bullies. IRL you could never walk away unscathed and have time for such a time consuming mission before they finally got you. So its one or the other. POTUS or your schoolmates.
In real life gunning for the POTUS is a form of suicide by cop, so most lone wolf individuals who attempt it are really doing just that. That was my point. Not all but most. So politics may not have much to do with it.
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
If his father had money he could have trained as an architect. His close relationship with Albert Speer and Leni Rifenstahl suggest he maintained his personal interest in art/design.
His father, though, was an unimaginative bully who saw the arts as an effeminate waste of time. He wanted Adolf to follow in his footsteps as a civil servant.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
If his father had money he could have trained as an architect. His close relationship with Albert Speer and Leni Rifenstahl suggest he maintained his personal interest in art/design.
His father, though, was an unimaginative bully who saw the arts as an effeminate waste of time. He wanted Adolf to follow in his footsteps as a civil servant.
Yes his father used to beat him/belittle him too so I guess Adolph Snr contributed to making him the man he would become.
Yes his script doesn't quite follow the classic bullied shooter does it. I wonder if his bullies were trump supporters? another classmate claimed there were students in his (Crooks) class who were full on MAGA (like dear little Nick Sandmann).
All except Hitler was a competent painter.
am not an art expert myself, but multiple artists i've known over the years have told me that he was a mediocre painter with a skewed sense of perspective.
Yes, he was nothing to write home about, but he could paint. If he hadn't gone on to take control of Germany and order the death of all those people in concentration camps, nobody would remember the artwork.
So, competent is probably appropriate, so is mediocre.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Trump’s pardons |
28 May 2025, 8:39 pm |
Trump is SO CRAZY! |
06 May 2025, 10:13 pm |
Trump Carney meeting |
06 May 2025, 9:22 pm |
Trump announces new name for the hoildays |
08 May 2025, 4:30 pm |