Another Trump Supporter threatening civil war

Post Reply New Topic

If ANYBODY banned free speech....whether it's Trump or some Democrat, I believe people would be up in arms.

But they would be TOGETHER, UNITED.....they wouldn't be fighting a "civil war."

They would be fighting the dickhead who even suggested such a thing.....

Civil Wars are ALWAYS a bad thing. We are not nearly at the point where people are going to take up arms for the cause of Trump, or the cause of some Democrat.

According to others here they’d be wrong to do so and should just accept being peasants to the new American king or queens.

It’s be a civil war if republicans kept their free speech and so sided with trump and only democrats lost theres and so fought back.

Or as in real life democrats taking rights away from non democrats and so non democrats say they fight if it happens.
Democrats aren’t fighting the democrats politicians stripping free speech. I don’t think our founders envisioned free speech zones, or hate speech laws.
Freedom zones(free speech) are a upfront to our nation.

No they aren’t. They bring freedom to the oppressed peopLe of nations. You have supported and still support civil wars. If you supoort South Korea, Tebet or Twain you support civil wars. If you support Palestine you support civil wars.

Why do you people dislike people fighting for their freedom or very existence?

Guess the Kurds should just roll over and die, same with Muslims in Middle East or the people of Venezuela

Guess the union shouldn’t fought the south and just let them leave cause civil wars are bad.

Democrats say if elected they ban simi auto guns and go door to door to take them back. They take kids from parents who don’t send them to public schools, they ban hate speech and make more free speech zones. So if elected their gut the bill of rights and you don’t think that cause a uprising?

If it was other way around you’d all feel differently. I highly doubt you all wouldn’t defend yourself or way of life if it came down to it. Huams have a self preservation instinct. Someone break in your house and attacks you, you’ll defend yourself, telling others that if it happen you’d defend yourself isn’t a call to violence and it’s insane to say it is.

Last edited by sly279 on 28 Oct 2019, 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

People just don't have the goddamn time to consider fighting a civil war based upon conditions today.

They got families to feed.

If people can't argue politics without thinking about civil war, then these people have problems.

What's going on, really, is there's a national debate. Most people know that----and know there's always going to be peaceful political debate in the United States. This has been going on since our country's founding.

They know there will be a few nuts going to demonstrations and fighting it out for each other for whatever reason. Sometimes, it's for the fun of it. Sometimes, it's just to feel macho or something. Other times, people are just obsessively angry; those people should just get a life.

Whats point in feeding your kids if they won’t have freedom and rights to grow up to?
Do you seriously think people won’t fight for their kids futures?

The bill of rights isn’t up to debate it isn’t a political issue. You are talking about people’s rights and freedom not some trivial issue like you seem to think it is.

The Second Amendment is very much alive. And it ain't going away any time soon......

Gun laws vary state by state----but the basic right to "bear arms" is not really threatened-----just regulated.

In some states, there's more regulation; in others, less.

There's still a hell of a lot of people who own guns, and who hunt, and who enjoy guns. Nobody is trying to take away their guns. And Obama wasn't trying to, either. I bet you HE even hunts.

Last edited by kraftiekortie on 28 Oct 2019, 5:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Some guy like that idiot umpire appears on millions of TVs and so can certainly stir the pot of anger and discontent.

Not many people are listening to that umpire; they think he's a nut.

The plantation oligarchs who had started the American Civil War hardly were fighting to end slavery. In fact, their motives were the exact opposite.

Nothing to stir unless it already existed which it does.

Maybe the left should back off? But we probably get more do what we say or die mentality

If Trump broke the law, then certainly not.

Are you saying the Union didn’t fight to end slavery cause in past you say they did?
If the union took the civil wars are bad policy they’d left the south to leave and not sought a civil war to bring them back.
Taiwan wouldn’t keep fighting for freedom and South Korea would surrendered without firing a shot.

I certainly hope you're right.

Civil war isn’t about trump and you know it. It’s about democrats wanting o strip the bill of rights and radical change the nation.

Trump is mearly a symptom of that.

I don't see many militias forming in my neck of the woods.....

Only survivalist nuts are creating militias for themselves. They have been doing this for decades----perhaps since Trump was born.

It’s already been gutted and they want to finis it off.

See no it doesn’t as we are one nation not a collection of nations and so no state can violate the 2nd amendment. Regulated goes agains not be infringed.

2nd amendment isn’t about hunting. Hunting was the norm back then it didn’t need protected. They wanted to Insure people could rise up against another king gorge.

Not to you, I don’t hunt. Most gun owners don’t hunt. It’s not about hunting.
Supreme Court ruled in 30s it’s about we the people having the same arms the military has. Ie machine guns, grenade launches, whatever infantry carry.

Democrats are in for surprise when they go to people’s doors to take their guns. Beto and the democrats running for president are crazy.

They're not going around taking away people's guns.

Obama never had people go around taking away people's guns.

None of the Democratic candidates believe in going house-to-house to take away people's guns.

I know what the Second Amendment is about. But I also know that ownership of guns should be regulated. I don't believe convicted felons, for example, should have access to guns.