Another Trump Supporter threatening civil war

Page 13 of 24 [ 380 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 24  Next

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,541
Location: Right over your left shoulder

29 Oct 2019, 12:53 am

sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kiprobalhato wrote:
sly279 wrote:
You all act like civil wars are bad.


WTF is this supposed to mean?

Was the civil war to end slavery bad? Is a civil war to end a dictatorship bad?

Civil wars are usually done to end bad things.
There’s always a reason civil wars happen some kind of big issue that causes tension to erupt into fighting.
Do you support people in Middle East fighting for their freedom? Do you support people in Africa, or South America fighting for theirs? Do you supoort Taiwan? What about Tebet?
If so then you support civil wars. Humans are a horrible species and sometimes the only way to bring good change is bloodshed, if not change doesn’t happen.

More recent and ongoing is Korea. Should South Korea not fought a civil war and just rolled over to Kim’s grand dad? Twain is in civil war too with China, one that stretches back to pre ww2.

Civil wars are almost always for good. Not to say the deaths and violence are but they are unfortunately needed in such situations where one side doesn’t care about the others voices and will.

Forgot about the balks civil war where one side was doing genocide cause they wanted the other to do what they say.

Wars aren’t always bad. To say anyone who resorts to war is bad is naive.


The plantation oligarchs who had started the American Civil War hardly were fighting to end slavery. In fact, their motives were the exact opposite.

Are you saying the Union didn’t fight to end slavery cause in past you say they did?
If the union took the civil wars are bad policy they’d left the south to leave and not sought a civil war to bring them back.
Taiwan wouldn’t keep fighting for freedom and South Korea would surrendered without firing a shot.


Yes, the Union did free the slaves. But it was the Confederacy that had started the war. That was my point.

Nope union started it by refusing to accept the southern states left and that confederate states existed. And by your logic they should have ask acknowledged them as a nation and pulled all their troops out , cause civil wars are bad.


The confederates opened fire on Fort Sumter, which made the conflict go from a political disagreement to a war - although one could fairly state that the war started when numerous traitor states declared their intentions to secede to protect the institution of slavery (as was explicitly noted in many of the letters of secession). Don't fall for Lost Cause revisionist history - the traitors have been trying to rewrite the history of the War of Southern Treachery since they lost it.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

29 Oct 2019, 1:17 am

TW1ZTY wrote:
Anybody here watch Gone With the Wind? Gooood movie. 8)

If they made a film glorifying the romanticism of nazi death camps then sure...it would be great
https://www.thewrap.com/film-critic-cal ... us-racism/



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

29 Oct 2019, 1:39 am

funeralxempire wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kiprobalhato wrote:
sly279 wrote:
You all act like civil wars are bad.


WTF is this supposed to mean?

Was the civil war to end slavery bad? Is a civil war to end a dictatorship bad?

Civil wars are usually done to end bad things.
There’s always a reason civil wars happen some kind of big issue that causes tension to erupt into fighting.
Do you support people in Middle East fighting for their freedom? Do you support people in Africa, or South America fighting for theirs? Do you supoort Taiwan? What about Tebet?
If so then you support civil wars. Humans are a horrible species and sometimes the only way to bring good change is bloodshed, if not change doesn’t happen.

More recent and ongoing is Korea. Should South Korea not fought a civil war and just rolled over to Kim’s grand dad? Twain is in civil war too with China, one that stretches back to pre ww2.

Civil wars are almost always for good. Not to say the deaths and violence are but they are unfortunately needed in such situations where one side doesn’t care about the others voices and will.

Forgot about the balks civil war where one side was doing genocide cause they wanted the other to do what they say.

Wars aren’t always bad. To say anyone who resorts to war is bad is naive.


The plantation oligarchs who had started the American Civil War hardly were fighting to end slavery. In fact, their motives were the exact opposite.

Are you saying the Union didn’t fight to end slavery cause in past you say they did?
If the union took the civil wars are bad policy they’d left the south to leave and not sought a civil war to bring them back.
Taiwan wouldn’t keep fighting for freedom and South Korea would surrendered without firing a shot.


Yes, the Union did free the slaves. But it was the Confederacy that had started the war. That was my point.

Nope union started it by refusing to accept the southern states left and that confederate states existed. And by your logic they should have ask acknowledged them as a nation and pulled all their troops out , cause civil wars are bad.


The confederates opened fire on Fort Sumter, which made the conflict go from a political disagreement to a war - although one could fairly state that the war started when numerous traitor states declared their intentions to secede to protect the institution of slavery (as was explicitly noted in many of the letters of secession). Don't fall for Lost Cause revisionist history - the traitors have been trying to rewrite the history of the War of Southern Treachery since they lost it.


How come nobody ever acknowledges the fact that the yankee doodle Americans commited treason against the British Empire during the American Revolution? I guess it was ok for the original 13 colonies to be traitors but wrong for the south for one reason only: they won and we lost.

And before you get so rightous about the slavery thing, don't ever forget that the Union was guilty of commiting genocide and oppression against the indigenous people here - both before and long after the Civil War.



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

29 Oct 2019, 1:49 am

cyberdad wrote:
TW1ZTY wrote:
Anybody here watch Gone With the Wind? Gooood movie. 8)

If they made a film glorifying the romanticism of nazi death camps then sure...it would be great
https://www.thewrap.com/film-critic-cal ... us-racism/


I don't understand where snowflakes get the idea that this movie glorified slavery? The movie itself showed how sh***y southerners were and served as a commentary on the Old South's rampant narcissism which led to their eventual downfall and destruction.

The bright pretty and colorful hoop skirts did not mask what truly horrid people that southerners were.

But the beauty behind the movie was that yes the characters were all horrid people (including Rhett and Scarlett) but they were still people. Like it our not just because people in the south had slaves that did not make then any less human than you. Same goes for the Nazis.

Humans do terrible things to other humans all the time.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Oct 2019, 1:58 am

sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kiprobalhato wrote:
sly279 wrote:
You all act like civil wars are bad.


WTF is this supposed to mean?

Was the civil war to end slavery bad? Is a civil war to end a dictatorship bad?

Civil wars are usually done to end bad things.
There’s always a reason civil wars happen some kind of big issue that causes tension to erupt into fighting.
Do you support people in Middle East fighting for their freedom? Do you support people in Africa, or South America fighting for theirs? Do you supoort Taiwan? What about Tebet?
If so then you support civil wars. Humans are a horrible species and sometimes the only way to bring good change is bloodshed, if not change doesn’t happen.

More recent and ongoing is Korea. Should South Korea not fought a civil war and just rolled over to Kim’s grand dad? Twain is in civil war too with China, one that stretches back to pre ww2.

Civil wars are almost always for good. Not to say the deaths and violence are but they are unfortunately needed in such situations where one side doesn’t care about the others voices and will.

Forgot about the balks civil war where one side was doing genocide cause they wanted the other to do what they say.

Wars aren’t always bad. To say anyone who resorts to war is bad is naive.


The plantation oligarchs who had started the American Civil War hardly were fighting to end slavery. In fact, their motives were the exact opposite.

Are you saying the Union didn’t fight to end slavery cause in past you say they did?
If the union took the civil wars are bad policy they’d left the south to leave and not sought a civil war to bring them back.
Taiwan wouldn’t keep fighting for freedom and South Korea would surrendered without firing a shot.


Yes, the Union did free the slaves. But it was the Confederacy that had started the war. That was my point.

Nope union started it by refusing to accept the southern states left and that confederate states existed. And by your logic they should have ask acknowledged them as a nation and pulled all their troops out , cause civil wars are bad.


We're supposed to let a portion of the country leave whenever they feel like it?
Despite what the far right tells you, America isn't just a federation of independent states voluntarily staying together as when the country was under the Articles of Confederation, but is one solid nation.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,541
Location: Right over your left shoulder

29 Oct 2019, 1:58 am

TW1ZTY wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kiprobalhato wrote:
sly279 wrote:
You all act like civil wars are bad.


WTF is this supposed to mean?

Was the civil war to end slavery bad? Is a civil war to end a dictatorship bad?

Civil wars are usually done to end bad things.
There’s always a reason civil wars happen some kind of big issue that causes tension to erupt into fighting.
Do you support people in Middle East fighting for their freedom? Do you support people in Africa, or South America fighting for theirs? Do you supoort Taiwan? What about Tebet?
If so then you support civil wars. Humans are a horrible species and sometimes the only way to bring good change is bloodshed, if not change doesn’t happen.

More recent and ongoing is Korea. Should South Korea not fought a civil war and just rolled over to Kim’s grand dad? Twain is in civil war too with China, one that stretches back to pre ww2.

Civil wars are almost always for good. Not to say the deaths and violence are but they are unfortunately needed in such situations where one side doesn’t care about the others voices and will.

Forgot about the balks civil war where one side was doing genocide cause they wanted the other to do what they say.

Wars aren’t always bad. To say anyone who resorts to war is bad is naive.


The plantation oligarchs who had started the American Civil War hardly were fighting to end slavery. In fact, their motives were the exact opposite.

Are you saying the Union didn’t fight to end slavery cause in past you say they did?
If the union took the civil wars are bad policy they’d left the south to leave and not sought a civil war to bring them back.
Taiwan wouldn’t keep fighting for freedom and South Korea would surrendered without firing a shot.


Yes, the Union did free the slaves. But it was the Confederacy that had started the war. That was my point.

Nope union started it by refusing to accept the southern states left and that confederate states existed. And by your logic they should have ask acknowledged them as a nation and pulled all their troops out , cause civil wars are bad.


The confederates opened fire on Fort Sumter, which made the conflict go from a political disagreement to a war - although one could fairly state that the war started when numerous traitor states declared their intentions to secede to protect the institution of slavery (as was explicitly noted in many of the letters of secession). Don't fall for Lost Cause revisionist history - the traitors have been trying to rewrite the history of the War of Southern Treachery since they lost it.


How come nobody ever acknowledges the fact that the yankee doodle Americans commited treason against the British Empire during the American Revolution? I guess it was ok for the original 13 colonies to be traitors but wrong for the south for one reason only: they won and we lost.

And before you get so rightous about the slavery thing, don't ever forget that the Union was guilty of commiting genocide and oppression against the indigenous people here - both before and long after the Civil War.


As a Canadian I have no problem describing the American Founding Fathers as traitors and saying Benedict Arnold wasn't a traitor, he merely remembered his loyalties. 8)

I'm also well aware of US government policies towards indigenous people.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

29 Oct 2019, 2:01 am

funeralxempire wrote:
TW1ZTY wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Kiprobalhato wrote:
sly279 wrote:
You all act like civil wars are bad.


WTF is this supposed to mean?

Was the civil war to end slavery bad? Is a civil war to end a dictatorship bad?

Civil wars are usually done to end bad things.
There’s always a reason civil wars happen some kind of big issue that causes tension to erupt into fighting.
Do you support people in Middle East fighting for their freedom? Do you support people in Africa, or South America fighting for theirs? Do you supoort Taiwan? What about Tebet?
If so then you support civil wars. Humans are a horrible species and sometimes the only way to bring good change is bloodshed, if not change doesn’t happen.

More recent and ongoing is Korea. Should South Korea not fought a civil war and just rolled over to Kim’s grand dad? Twain is in civil war too with China, one that stretches back to pre ww2.

Civil wars are almost always for good. Not to say the deaths and violence are but they are unfortunately needed in such situations where one side doesn’t care about the others voices and will.

Forgot about the balks civil war where one side was doing genocide cause they wanted the other to do what they say.

Wars aren’t always bad. To say anyone who resorts to war is bad is naive.


The plantation oligarchs who had started the American Civil War hardly were fighting to end slavery. In fact, their motives were the exact opposite.

Are you saying the Union didn’t fight to end slavery cause in past you say they did?
If the union took the civil wars are bad policy they’d left the south to leave and not sought a civil war to bring them back.
Taiwan wouldn’t keep fighting for freedom and South Korea would surrendered without firing a shot.


Yes, the Union did free the slaves. But it was the Confederacy that had started the war. That was my point.

Nope union started it by refusing to accept the southern states left and that confederate states existed. And by your logic they should have ask acknowledged them as a nation and pulled all their troops out , cause civil wars are bad.


The confederates opened fire on Fort Sumter, which made the conflict go from a political disagreement to a war - although one could fairly state that the war started when numerous traitor states declared their intentions to secede to protect the institution of slavery (as was explicitly noted in many of the letters of secession). Don't fall for Lost Cause revisionist history - the traitors have been trying to rewrite the history of the War of Southern Treachery since they lost it.


How come nobody ever acknowledges the fact that the yankee doodle Americans commited treason against the British Empire during the American Revolution? I guess it was ok for the original 13 colonies to be traitors but wrong for the south for one reason only: they won and we lost.

And before you get so rightous about the slavery thing, don't ever forget that the Union was guilty of commiting genocide and oppression against the indigenous people here - both before and long after the Civil War.


As a Canadian I have no problem describing the American Founding Fathers as traitors and saying Benedict Arnold wasn't a traitor, he merely remembered his loyalties. 8)

I'm also well aware of US government policies towards indigenous people.



Ok, so yeah! If the south had actually won the Civil War we would not be remembered as traitors. :mrgreen:

"History is written by the victors using the blood of the fallen."



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Oct 2019, 2:06 am

TW1ZTY wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
TW1ZTY wrote:
Anybody here watch Gone With the Wind? Gooood movie. 8)

If they made a film glorifying the romanticism of nazi death camps then sure...it would be great
https://www.thewrap.com/film-critic-cal ... us-racism/


I don't understand where snowflakes get the idea that this movie glorified slavery? The movie itself showed how sh***y southerners were and served as a commentary on the Old South's rampant narcissism which led to their eventual downfall and destruction.

The bright pretty and colorful hoop skirts did not mask what truly horrid people that southerners were.

But the beauty behind the movie was that yes the characters were all horrid people (including Rhett and Scarlett) but they were still people. Like it our not just because people in the south had slaves that did not make then any less human than you. Same goes for the Nazis.

Humans do terrible things to other humans all the time.


One movie you may be interested in is Free State Of Jones, involving a guerrilla band of Confederate deserters and escaped slaves under the leadership of Newton Knight, who had carried out non-stop warfare against the Confederacy within it's borders. Knight was a poor southerner who was tired of fighting a war started by rich men whose sons didn't have to fight and die for it, and so he took up arms against the rebel government. After the war, he did his part for Radical Reconstruction, and to show you that he practiced what he preached, he married a black woman and escaped slave when it was illegal, and still has mixed race descendants in Mississippi.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

29 Oct 2019, 2:09 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
TW1ZTY wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
TW1ZTY wrote:
Anybody here watch Gone With the Wind? Gooood movie. 8)

If they made a film glorifying the romanticism of nazi death camps then sure...it would be great
https://www.thewrap.com/film-critic-cal ... us-racism/


I don't understand where snowflakes get the idea that this movie glorified slavery? The movie itself showed how sh***y southerners were and served as a commentary on the Old South's rampant narcissism which led to their eventual downfall and destruction.

The bright pretty and colorful hoop skirts did not mask what truly horrid people that southerners were.

But the beauty behind the movie was that yes the characters were all horrid people (including Rhett and Scarlett) but they were still people. Like it our not just because people in the south had slaves that did not make then any less human than you. Same goes for the Nazis.

Humans do terrible things to other humans all the time.


One movie you may be interested in is Free State Of Jones, involving a guerrilla band of Confederate deserters and escaped slaves under the leadership of Newton Knight, who had carried out non-stop warfare against the Confederacy within it's borders. Knight was a poor southerner who was tired of fighting a war started by rich men whose sons didn't have to fight and die for it, and so he took up arms against the rebel government. After the war, he did his part for Radical Reconstruction, and to show you that he practiced what he preached, he married a black woman and escaped slave when it was illegal, and still has mixed race descendants in Mississippi.


Hmm, to be honest I'm not really into war movies of any kind. I find all wars stupid. The main reason I liked Gone With the Wind was because it focused primarily on the women left behind during a war while their men were off fighting. I find that much more relatable...



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

29 Oct 2019, 2:27 am

TW1ZTY wrote:
But the beauty behind the movie was that yes the characters were all horrid people (including Rhett and Scarlett) but they were still people. Like it our not just because people in the south had slaves that did not make then any less human than you. Same goes for the Nazis.


That was exactly my point, you could romanticise anything, even the most hellish conditions. One of the most famous psychiatrists in history was a holocaust survivor named Fritz Perls. Perls postulated that you could find beauty even in a Nazi death camp.

I am sure the antebellum period in the south could be (likewise) be romanticised even by black Americans. However we need to accept that both death camps and slavery triggers negative images in the minds of Jewish people and black Americans.



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

29 Oct 2019, 2:38 am

cyberdad wrote:
TW1ZTY wrote:
But the beauty behind the movie was that yes the characters were all horrid people (including Rhett and Scarlett) but they were still people. Like it our not just because people in the south had slaves that did not make then any less human than you. Same goes for the Nazis.


That was exactly my point, you could romanticise anything, even the most hellish conditions. One of the most famous psychiatrists in history was a holocaust survivor named Fritz Perls. Perls postulated that you could find beauty even in a Nazi death camp.

I am sure the antebellum period in the south could be (likewise) be romanticised even by black Americans. However we need to accept that both death camps and slavery triggers negative images in the minds of Jewish people and black Americans.


I can understand that.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 38,085
Location: Long Island, New York

29 Oct 2019, 2:52 am

sly279 wrote:
You all act like civil wars are bad.

Do not confuse necessary with good. 750,000 dead people in the 1860s Civil War plus those physically and mentally crippled, plus physical economic destruction is anything but good.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

29 Oct 2019, 3:16 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
sly279 wrote:
You all act like civil wars are bad.

Do not confuse necessary with good. 750,000 dead people in the 1860s Civil War plus those physically and mentally crippled, plus physical economic destruction is anything but good.


Not to mention confederate war crimes
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/ ... -murdered/



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

29 Oct 2019, 3:17 am

cyberdad wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
sly279 wrote:
You all act like civil wars are bad.

Do not confuse necessary with good. 750,000 dead people in the 1860s Civil War plus those physically and mentally crippled, plus physical economic destruction is anything but good.


Not to mention confederate war crimes
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/ ... -murdered/


And don't forget Union war crimes.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elmira_Prison



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

29 Oct 2019, 3:23 am

Oh wait, I forgot. It's not considered a war crime if you actually win the war. :roll:



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

29 Oct 2019, 3:44 am

Oh and here's a list of other Union war crimes. So don't flatter yourself into thinking that only the Confederates were evil.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor ... war_crimes