Chavez: Bush should get death penalty

Post Reply New Topic

I'm just wiping a bit of dung from under my foot.

Yet condemning yourself to the same stink in the process?

I understand argument, we can learn much from it.

But you really think you have the right to put other people down in such a way? We're all equal... Maybe you (and the others behaving the same) should realise that we're all here to speak to each other, and proving one is smarter than the other actually helps NOBODY.

If you really didn't care, you would simply state your opinion and move on, so according to your metaphor you're enjoying the smell and taste of this dung.

Surely we have the brains to speak through topics?

You're not greater than me, or anyone else here.. You do not have the moral high ground, you are not superior to NTs.

What can you expect from a Jaguars fan?

------------------------------------------------------

Pats Rule!

If you think your remark was funny, sorry but a swing and a miss.

Well then, you're obviously not worth talking to. Go torture an Arab for God. I'm outta here.

And yet most of HIS people live in poverty much worse than poor Americans do. It's just a cheap PR stunt. Chavez is an effing hipocrite!!

Where's your evidence that "W" deliberately mislead the public?? Even the Russian inteligence agencies were sayint thet there were WMD's.

Can you show me the legal precident that says that a nations leader is criminaly responsible for any war for any reason??

Since Fox news reports many (if not most) of the same stories as other news agencies, are they ALL disreputable?? Or is it just Fox that has no cred in your opinion because you're a foaming-at-the-mouth radical??

Quite ironic, you demonstrate the same narrow-minded bigotry that religious nutters do! hehehehehehehehe

Don't try to explain any of that type logic at him. He is def a few fries short of a happy meal.

Excuse me.

It seems that ya'll aren't using a more sophisticated idea of getting the news.....maybe CNN? MSNBC?

Seriously. Ya'll are arguing over Chavez. Once Bush is out of office, we will be dealign with Chavez, as in sending in the specialists to assassinate him. Chavez wants to wipe out America. it doesn't matter if Bush is running the place or not. The man is obviously going to get it in the end. and he'll go like Saddam.

SO SHUT UP. seriously. You make politics look stupid. and I'm sure half my friends in the military would agree with me. specially Air Force Intelligence where I get the real news.

rofl

you mean like the itelligence that said Saddam had weapons of mass destruction?

(sorry - couldn't resist butting in).

no. that was special forces or something.

no. this guy is top level. that's all I can tell you.

That wasn't intelligence. That was policy. There was intelligence out the wazoo indicating that there were no weapons of mass destruction, and that there was no connection to 9/11.

While the spinmeisters are still trying to muddle the issue, the president himself has admitted that there were no WMDs and no connection.

As far as Chavez, I'm not really sure how I feel about him. But I am disinclined to believe much of the negative that I read about him, because of several details:

1) the first several things that I read about him described him as a dictator. This is not the case, he is democratically elected.
2) Many of the people cited the fact that he criticised Bush as evidence of his danger.
3) As mentioned above, he has made several offers to the US to ensure adequate supply of fuel oil, and been turned down at least at the federal level.
4) Gas stations that are owned by Venezuela are among the few places where one can get gasoline that does not go to the middle east.

So George W did not get top level advice?

Catalyst, I think you are right, it was a policy decision and WMD was an excuse to support the policy. However George W, Tony Blair and John Howard all explicitly said the reason we were sending soldiers to war and killing thousands of people was because of WMD.

If we were lied to and reasons for a war are fabricated (as seems clear), I think all involved in the deception should be guilty of some sort of criminal charges.

Last edited by BazzaMcKenzie on 29 Nov 2006, 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

once again. I can't answer that. mainly because the information I get is coming from a military source. and I could get arrested for knowing it. therefore I can't tell you anything. only what I said.