Page 4 of 13 [ 198 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 13  Next

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

17 Feb 2020, 2:42 am

The data suggests who his support base are so there's nothing unequivocal about that.

As far as their motivation is concerned we can at least surmise they at least tolerate Trump's populist, nationalist, misogynistic and racist reputation. I would not be surprised many of his supporters hated what they thought was political correctness during the Obama years. Trump only stood for two things - populism and nationalism.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Feb 2020, 2:47 am

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
Democrats make most everything out to be racist, and kids pick up on that.


Or maybe the Dems are simply pointing out racist rhetoric?


It seems like the game plan it to proclaim themselves as being human rights activists while accusing millions of others of being deplorable fascist racists.


No, just those who are.


Which is conveniently vague.


What's vague about people who promote the notion that some races are inferior to others, that criminality is genetic in such inferior races, and that said races should be deported, suppressed, sterilized, or even murdered? Those are the deplorables. Denying this fact is only helping said deplorables.


It is vague because democrats can apply it in various ways to any person or group who is not democrat. If you're not dem then at the very least you're sus.

There is a huge indefinable threat out there and the Democrats are the guardians against it. Racists, Russians and climate catastrophe.


Uh... no. If people don't say those abhorrent, deplorable things - or defend racists - then they won't be called racists.


That gets shot down by the all the racist codes there are supposed to be. Which again is vauge and subject to constant change.


Again... no. While there are those - like Trump - who use coded bigoted words, the people I'm mostly talking about are the sorts at the Charlottesville demonstration who murdered Heather Heyer. And again, people who say we liberals are just unjustly throwing feces at ordinary conservatives are actually protecting such deplorable trash we attack.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Feb 2020, 2:51 am

Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Don't forget Trump's Muslim ban (and before anyone pipes up how that's only about religion, it should be pointed out that Muslim countries are mainly made up of brown and black people).


And yet, strangely enough, the country with the highest number of followers of this religion (Indonesia) was not included in the ban, nor were the majority of countries where this is the main/only religion, so to call it a ban on a religion, rather than to look at the actual reason (inability to confirm the id's of people from the specific countries which were targeted) would seem to be disingenuous at best.


Stephen Miller, the Nazi/Jewish hybrid, was far more interested in race and religion when he came up with this atrocity for Trump.


I'm curious...Are there any documents/recordings of this, or is your statement/belief based upon assumption, supposition, or 3rd party hear-say? I'm not denying it is possible (probable? I have no idea who this person is), but with the amount of "racist", etc. claims flying around (along with reporters presenting opinions as facts), it would be nice to be able to see an actual "original"/"first-hand" record of this before I make up my mind as to whether this was the intention behind the changes to entry requirements over there.

From the outside, they look like basic measures which would be expected to be in place so that it is known who (and how many) people are entering the country, but I can see how with the correct "motivation" they can be made to sound like they are aimed at specific races/religions in order to "discriminate against" or "protect against" these people (make you pick based on what you wish to see).


https://www.truthdig.com/articles/steph ... ed-emails/

Here's an article right here.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

17 Feb 2020, 4:54 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
Democrats make most everything out to be racist, and kids pick up on that.


Or maybe the Dems are simply pointing out racist rhetoric?


It seems like the game plan it to proclaim themselves as being human rights activists while accusing millions of others of being deplorable fascist racists.


No, just those who are.


Which is conveniently vague.


What's vague about people who promote the notion that some races are inferior to others, that criminality is genetic in such inferior races, and that said races should be deported, suppressed, sterilized, or even murdered? Those are the deplorables. Denying this fact is only helping said deplorables.


It is vague because democrats can apply it in various ways to any person or group who is not democrat. If you're not dem then at the very least you're sus.

There is a huge indefinable threat out there and the Democrats are the guardians against it. Racists, Russians and climate catastrophe.


Uh... no. If people don't say those abhorrent, deplorable things - or defend racists - then they won't be called racists.


That gets shot down by the all the racist codes there are supposed to be. Which again is vauge and subject to constant change.


Again... no. While there are those - like Trump - who use coded bigoted words, the people I'm mostly talking about are the sorts at the Charlottesville demonstration who murdered Heather Heyer. And again, people who say we liberals are just unjustly throwing feces at ordinary conservatives are actually protecting such deplorable trash we attack.


Like I said what I see is them harping on and hyping threats while portraying themselves as the guardians against those threats. The worse they make things look the more needed they are. I am talking about those in power. Politicians, moguls, media etc.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Feb 2020, 6:30 am

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
Democrats make most everything out to be racist, and kids pick up on that.


Or maybe the Dems are simply pointing out racist rhetoric?


It seems like the game plan it to proclaim themselves as being human rights activists while accusing millions of others of being deplorable fascist racists.


No, just those who are.


Which is conveniently vague.


What's vague about people who promote the notion that some races are inferior to others, that criminality is genetic in such inferior races, and that said races should be deported, suppressed, sterilized, or even murdered? Those are the deplorables. Denying this fact is only helping said deplorables.


It is vague because democrats can apply it in various ways to any person or group who is not democrat. If you're not dem then at the very least you're sus.

There is a huge indefinable threat out there and the Democrats are the guardians against it. Racists, Russians and climate catastrophe.


Uh... no. If people don't say those abhorrent, deplorable things - or defend racists - then they won't be called racists.


That gets shot down by the all the racist codes there are supposed to be. Which again is vauge and subject to constant change.


Again... no. While there are those - like Trump - who use coded bigoted words, the people I'm mostly talking about are the sorts at the Charlottesville demonstration who murdered Heather Heyer. And again, people who say we liberals are just unjustly throwing feces at ordinary conservatives are actually protecting such deplorable trash we attack.


Like I said what I see is them harping on and hyping threats while portraying themselves as the guardians against those threats. The worse they make things look the more needed they are. I am talking about those in power. Politicians, moguls, media etc.


You're not suggesting that racism is not a real problem, are you? Because it is the job for everyone to call out social evils like racism, no matter who they are. It's not just a means to grab power and influence.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

17 Feb 2020, 7:47 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Like I said what I see is them harping on and hyping threats while portraying themselves as the guardians against those threats. The worse they make things look the more needed they are. I am talking about those in power. Politicians, moguls, media etc.


You're not suggesting that racism is not a real problem, are you? Because it is the job for everyone to call out social evils like racism, no matter who they are. It's not just a means to grab power and influence.


My statement was direct not suggestive. What I said in my above post has you talking about racism more than anything else on WP. Pretty much on a daily basis. You and especially cyberdad will even interject the subject of racism into a thead. And it all points to Trump, republicans and conservatives.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

17 Feb 2020, 7:50 am

By the way what are the code words Trump is using?



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Feb 2020, 5:31 pm

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Like I said what I see is them harping on and hyping threats while portraying themselves as the guardians against those threats. The worse they make things look the more needed they are. I am talking about those in power. Politicians, moguls, media etc.


You're not suggesting that racism is not a real problem, are you? Because it is the job for everyone to call out social evils like racism, no matter who they are. It's not just a means to grab power and influence.


My statement was direct not suggestive. What I said in my above post has you talking about racism more than anything else on WP. Pretty much on a daily basis. You and especially cyberdad will even interject the subject of racism into a thead. And it all points to Trump, republicans and conservatives.


Cyberdad and I have never said all conservatives are racists, but the fact remains that racists, reactionaries, and nativists have always gravitated toward conservative political movements. The Republican party leadership has been supporting voter suppression directed at minorities and the poor, as well as attempting to abolish legal protections, as they understand who part of their base is.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Feb 2020, 5:36 pm

EzraS wrote:
By the way what are the code words Trump is using?


Illegal aliens for Latinos in general, just to name one. A wave of Anti-Latino bigotry has emerged since Trump's initial candidacy, which in turn has emboldened racists to crawl out from their rocks to attack anyone they hate.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

17 Feb 2020, 9:40 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
By the way what are the code words Trump is using?


Illegal aliens for Latinos in general, just to name one. A wave of Anti-Latino bigotry has emerged since Trump's initial candidacy, which in turn has emboldened racists to crawl out from their rocks to attack anyone they hate.


You do seem to be grasping at straws with this claim...

The term used would cover anyone who was not a citizen of the USA ("aliens") and unlawfully in the country ("illegal"), covering both those who entered the country without going through the normal border checks\no visa, as well as those who have exceeded their approved time within the country (overstaying Visa) or peforming actions outside those approved of under their visa (working while on tourist visa, for example).

Under your logic, it would appear that any term used to describe people inside the USA (for example) without legitimate/legal reason would also come to be termed as "code words", not because that is the intention behind their use, but because this is the easiest way to prevent discussion about the issue of people entering countries outside of the country's approved channels, or being inside the countries illegally.

The fact that a portion of a specific group of people may make up the majority of those who fit under the term does not mean the term is focused on this group. Trying to redefine the term to imply it solely refers to this group (either to "protect" by calling it a "code word for racists" or "denigrate" by refering to all people of this group using the term) is insulting to both the group of people involved, as well as those who wish to have a civil discussion regarding the underlying cause of people fitting under the term and ways to fix this.

Of course, I'd be happy to revise my opinion of your "code word" claim should you be able to come up with a term/phrase which would cover all people who are inside a country illegally and which could never have the possibility to morph into another "code word"...



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

17 Feb 2020, 10:56 pm

I do not think it is his claim. I think it is what he has been programmed to believe.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Feb 2020, 10:57 pm

Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
By the way what are the code words Trump is using?


Illegal aliens for Latinos in general, just to name one. A wave of Anti-Latino bigotry has emerged since Trump's initial candidacy, which in turn has emboldened racists to crawl out from their rocks to attack anyone they hate.


You do seem to be grasping at straws with this claim...

The term used would cover anyone who was not a citizen of the USA ("aliens") and unlawfully in the country ("illegal"), covering both those who entered the country without going through the normal border checks\no visa, as well as those who have exceeded their approved time within the country (overstaying Visa) or peforming actions outside those approved of under their visa (working while on tourist visa, for example).

Under your logic, it would appear that any term used to describe people inside the USA (for example) without legitimate/legal reason would also come to be termed as "code words", not because that is the intention behind their use, but because this is the easiest way to prevent discussion about the issue of people entering countries outside of the country's approved channels, or being inside the countries illegally.

The fact that a portion of a specific group of people may make up the majority of those who fit under the term does not mean the term is focused on this group. Trying to redefine the term to imply it solely refers to this group (either to "protect" by calling it a "code word for racists" or "denigrate" by refering to all people of this group using the term) is insulting to both the group of people involved, as well as those who wish to have a civil discussion regarding the underlying cause of people fitting under the term and ways to fix this.

Of course, I'd be happy to revise my opinion of your "code word" claim should you be able to come up with a term/phrase which would cover all people who are inside a country illegally and which could never have the possibility to morph into another "code word"...


I'll be easy on you because you're not an American, and don't know what's been happening in my country under that human/Cheeto hybrid. Trump's followers have been directing their anger not just at illegals, but all Latinos since he last ran for President. It's gotten ugly. When one judge had blocked Trump early in his Presidency, Trump attacked the judge, referring to him as a "Mexican." The judge in question is of Mexican descent, but is an American.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

17 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm

EzraS wrote:
I do not think it is his claim. I think it is what he has been programmed to believe.


Is that how you explain away everything you disagree with? He/she was programmed to think nonsense? Figuring I'd be a good conservative if I only resisted being brainwashed, huh?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

17 Feb 2020, 11:23 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
I'll be easy on you because you're not an American, and don't know what's been happening in my country under that human/Cheeto hybrid. Trump's followers have been directing their anger not just at illegals, but all Latinos since he last ran for President. It's gotten ugly. When one judge had blocked Trump early in his Presidency, Trump attacked the judge, referring to him as a "Mexican." The judge in question is of Mexican descent, but is an American.


Funny considering your internet twin on this subforum is an Australian.

As an American I think unlike you Brictoria is being sensible and reasonable.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

17 Feb 2020, 11:49 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
I do not think it is his claim. I think it is what he has been programmed to believe.


Is that how you explain away everything you disagree with? He/she was programmed to think nonsense? Figuring I'd be a good conservative if I only resisted being brainwashed, huh?


You sound brainwashed in thinking the alternative is becoming a conservative.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

18 Feb 2020, 1:02 am

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Funny considering your internet twin on this subforum is an Australian.


What's even more funny is you dragging me into your battles when I am being civil to you, Just can't help yourself :roll: