I wonder if the Republicans would try to overturn this decision, by categorically excluding coverage of sex reassignment surgery by Medicare by statute, or heck! even requiring such categorical exclusions in any and all federally funded plans (which would include just about every plan except for those under ERISA). If the Republicans take over both Houses of Congress this year, would Obama compromise this coverage away, with a bill singling sex reassignment surgery out? (As for the bill itself, its name would be Legion: For they are many sections on many different subjects.) Obama would look reasonable (but not actually be reasonable) by signing such a bill into law, because after all, sex reassignment surgery isn't really that necessary for anybody, say most Republicans and many Democrats, and because deficit.
I just told my gay paternal uncle about this decision and he warned me that I needed to take advantage of this fast, before the Republicans returned to power! Only thing is, I'm not on Medicare.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin