verizon turns down $550 million to serve rural communities

Page 1 of 1 [ 16 posts ] 

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

31 Aug 2015, 5:02 pm

(clicky)verizon turns down $550 million to expand internet service in rural communities
WASHINGTON - Verizon today became the only major U.S. telecommunications company to turn down federal funding to build broadband in unserved, primarily rural, communities, leaving many residents in eight states and the District of Columbia without access to vital communications options. The company was offered $568 million over six years by the Federal government to bring broadband to 270,000 locations in Washington, DC, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia.
“Verizon’s track record is clear,” said Bob Master, Assistant to the Vice President of District One of the Communications Workers of America. “Even while raking in a billion dollars per month in profits, Verizon is turning its back on underserved communities by refusing federal subsidies to expand high-speed internet access. Instead, its top priority is slashing job and retirement security for its employees and eliminating benefits for workers injured on the job.”

another rotten corporation screwing over its rural customers just to shave a buck here and there. I would not get Verizon service even if they offered it.



xenocity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,282
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

31 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm

Verizon going to Verizon.


_________________
Something.... Weird... Something...


Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,390
Location: Norway

31 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm

auntblabby wrote:
another rotten corporation screwing over its rural customers

But they are not their customers.



blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

31 Aug 2015, 9:14 pm

And AT&T grudgingly accepted it



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

31 Aug 2015, 9:26 pm

and I honor AT&T for that choice, and will own their products. I would not have anything to do with Verizon.



xenocity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,282
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

31 Aug 2015, 9:43 pm

blauSamstag wrote:
And AT&T grudgingly accepted it

AT&T had too, in order to get DirecTV buyout approval.
It was part of the terms.


_________________
Something.... Weird... Something...


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

31 Aug 2015, 9:46 pm

^^^
whatever it takes to get them to do the right thing by the most people.



superpentil
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 203

31 Aug 2015, 10:47 pm

The telecom companies tend to dig their own holes. Soon a company will come out that will do what it's supposed to do and I'm damn sure that Verizon and AT&T will be downright pissed and end up scrambling overtime to recover.

I have a vendetta against those two companies.


_________________
"Sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 175 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 37 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


xenocity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,282
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

31 Aug 2015, 10:48 pm

superpentil wrote:
The telecom companies tend to dig their own holes. Soon a company will come out that will do what it's supposed to do and I'm damn sure that Verizon and AT&T will be downright pissed and end up scrambling overtime to recover.

I have a vendetta against those two companies.

Not really, since the big 4 own nearly all of the spectrum for cell service.
It's damn near impossible to break into the telecom industry in the U.S.


_________________
Something.... Weird... Something...


superpentil
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 203

31 Aug 2015, 10:59 pm

Quote:
Not really, since the big 4 own nearly all of the spectrum for cell service.
It's damn near impossible to break into the telecom industry in the U.S.

Unless someone buys up a large portion of an existing company and manages that company better.



xenocity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,282
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

31 Aug 2015, 11:13 pm

superpentil wrote:
Quote:
Not really, since the big 4 own nearly all of the spectrum for cell service.
It's damn near impossible to break into the telecom industry in the U.S.

Unless someone buys up a large portion of an existing company and manages that company better.

That would require federal approval due to the national security issues regarding the companies.

Verizon has a market cap of $187.31 Billion
AT&T has a market cap of $204.77 Billion
Comcast has a market cap of $142.59 Billion
T-Mobile (owns Metro PCS) has a market cap of $32.59 Billion (Deutsche Telekom owns the majority)
Sprint has a market cap of $20.59 Billion and recently had the majority stake bought by SoftBank of Japan after a massive federal security investigation before approving it.

Exxon-mobile has a market cap of $313 Billion
Microsoft has a market cap of $351.35 Billion
Google has a market cap of $442.16 Billion
Apple has the largest market cap in the world at $646.06 Billion

The point is, it is very expensive to buy AT&T or Verizon and most companies don't have market cap to do that.


_________________
Something.... Weird... Something...


superpentil
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 203

31 Aug 2015, 11:34 pm

I'm looking at it from a market valuation perspective than a market capital perspective. Regardless, I'm aware of how 'mad' you'd have to be in order to deal with all the BS in this market. Doesn't mean it's not possible to completely ninja-move stuff. I'm also looking at it beyond the monetary stand point that most people don't look past. There's a lot more at stake than just the billions of dollars you'd have to spend in order to get into this mess, such as the moral high ground. Depending on who you are, you could consider that naiveté or someone who has their act together.

It's not impossible for what I mentioned in my first response to happen. Just highly unlikely.



Butterfly88
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,011
Location: United States

01 Sep 2015, 1:23 pm

That's terrible! And why turn down free money?



Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,390
Location: Norway

01 Sep 2015, 1:25 pm

Butterfly88 wrote:
...why turn down free money?

Probably too many strings attached ("free money" doesn't really exist).



Meistersinger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,700
Location: Beautiful(?) West Manchester Township PA

01 Sep 2015, 3:24 pm

They turned it down because, more than likely they can't make an obscene profit on a rural market. All the major common carriers are notorious for "cherry picking" their markets.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

01 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm

I'm glad I don't have any $$ invested with those greedy bastards :x