naturalplastic wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Theodiskaz wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Imagine the colors were reversed. Where's the media outrage?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/cr ... 94016.htmlI googled the man's name, Rezzas Abdulla, an apparent psychiatric patient. I found media outrage in english up through page 19 or so, then there was some apparent media outrage in foreign languages.
Does that help?
Yes, when a non white person does it, they are just mentally unstable, but if it's the other way round they do it because they are "whitesupremacistsnaziskkkbnpedl...."
Poor baby.
you're crying because "other people get to be racist, but not me. So why cant I be racist too? Boo friggin' hoo."
Obviously if the colors were reversed it would be likely that the White person doing the spitting would also be recognized as being "mentally unstable". Spitting on babies doesnt usually correlate with sanity. But forget that.
You seem to think that being labeled "mentally unstable" is somehow better (being given perferential treatment) to being called "racist".
So why dont we on WP give you the same preferential treatment?
From now on you John Powell can spout any racist tripe you want, and the rest of us wont call you "racist".
We all will just call you "mentally unstable" instead.
Since seem to think that the label "mentally unstable" is some kind of honorable title, or compliment, there is no reason for you to object to it. So why not?
You really don't get it do you. I'm not asking for permission to be racist. I'm asking for consistency and for others to practice what they preach. But mainly I'm pointing out the media's intentional race baiting and the double standards that come with it.
"Racism" causes more outrage than blowing millions of people up. If someone supports war that's fine, but if they're in the public eye and found guilty of "racism" or even accused of it, they are treated like they've carried out one of the worst crimes going, unless it's a white person who's the "victim" and this is utterly deranged.
If someone is called mentally unstable, then that would mean they get almost excused from their crime or alleged crime.
I said "if the spitter had been White, and the baby Black, the spitter would have been branded as being a nut job" (just like he was so branded). So I obviously "got" you alledged point. But also see through your alleged "point" to the truth: that you want the fun of being racist and wrongly believe that this lunatic person is getting the free pass on it that you envy.
And as it was there was a lot of outrage about his act. So your "point" was moot anyway.
16 Mar 2017, 9:27 pm
