Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ] 

jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

22 Jul 2017, 11:00 am

Since the recent SCOTUS decision in favor of the Pan-Asian band, The Slants, people have begun to seek copyright and trademark protections for a slew of offensive terms. The story is rife with examples.

http://www.npr.org/2017/07/21/538608404 ... sive-words

Quote:
Why swastikas?

STEVE MAYNARD: Because the term has an incendiary meaning behind it.

CHANG: Yeah.

MAYNARD: And it's currently used as a symbol of hate. And if we can own the brand, we will be able to control the sale of the brand and the use of the brand as well.

CHANG: Oh, so you're trying to basically grab the swastika so real, actual racists and haters can't grab the swastika as a...

MAYNARD: Correct.

CHANG: ...Registered trademark.

MAYNARD: Correct.

CHANG: But there's a catch. Maynard can't just get the trademark, put it in a drawer and make sure nobody else uses it. To keep a trademark, he actually needs to sell a swastika product. So he will - blankets, shirts, flags. But he plans to make these products so expensive he's hoping no one will ever buy them.

MAYNARD: If you want to buy that swastika flag, you've got to buy it through us. And it's going to be a thousand dollars each.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade