Mysterious jump in excess mortality among younger cohorts

Post Reply New Topic

I’ve known quite a few people who had COVID over the past 2 1/2 years.

One died of the original strain, pre-vaccination. He had severe diabetes.

A couple got pneumonia, also with the original strain, pre-vaccination, but neither required hospitalization.

I had the original strain, pre-vaccination. Mine was fully a three-week illness, but I recovered with no Long COVID.

After the original strain, and after vaccination, all who got COVID had a three-day flu-like illness, and recovered within a week.

Apparently there's evidence that COVID itself (not the vaccine -- or, at least, not JUST the vaccine) is leaving people more vulnerable to heart disease, brain disease, and various other conditions. I just now came across the following:

"The growing evidence that Covid-19 is leaving people sicker "
- Financial Times story
- Summary on Twitter

UK withdraws vaccine for young children.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... in-england

This much seems to be true.

According to third hand information through thegatewaypundit (!) and Steve Bannon's podcast (!), this is because an investigation has uncovered that the vaccine has serious effects on testicular development in young boys and teenagers. Obviously don't automatically believe that, I'll keep looking for that "investigation" but there have been other links found between the vaccine and fertility in both men and women so it is not something we would be amazingly surprised to learn was true.

Some anonymous investigators continue their collection of data regarding athlete deaths.

https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athlete ... ovid-shot/

So far the tally is 1323 down with cardiac issues, 900 Dead since the shots were rolled out.

Compared to previous years:

The International Olympic Committee in Lausanne, Switzerland, studied documents from international data banks from 1966 to 2004. Those documents indicate 1,101 sudden deaths in athletes under 35 years of age, an average of 29 athletes per year, the sports with the highest incidence being soccer and basketball. (NIH Document)

A study by Maron on sudden death in US athletes, from 1980 to 2006 in thirty-eight sports identified 1,866 deaths of athletes with cardiac disease, with a prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

2005 to 2006 averaged sixty-six (66) deaths per year, with 82% of those occurring during competition or training.

Covid does strange things to people. I know that I was really depressed two years ago, during lock down.

The Atlantic rushes forth where other outlets fear to tread:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/arc ... er/671308/

Did a Famous Doctor’s COVID Shot Make His Cancer Worse?

As he followed these instructions, Michel felt a gnawing worry that his COVID booster shot had somehow made him sicker. His brother was harboring a similar concern. The asymmetrical cluster of cancerous nodes around Michel’s left armpit on the initial scan had already seemed “a bit disturbing,” as his brother said; especially given that Michel’s first two doses of vaccine had been delivered on that side. Now he’d had a booster shot in the other arm, and the cancer’s asymmetry was flipped.

The brothers knew this might be just an eerie coincidence. But they couldn’t shake the feeling that Michel had experienced what would be a very rare yet life-threatening side effect of COVID vaccination. For a doctor who had spent four decades studying and advocating for new medicines, that feeling would unfold into many months of deliberation and self-doubt. Michel used to run an institute for vaccine-technology research, and he’s spoken out to reassure the public about the safety of the COVID vaccines, and of the mRNA vaccines in particular. In December 2020, he told an interviewer that “if there was a real problem with the technology, we’d have seen it before now for sure.” His “main concern,” he continued, was that people would use the mere possibility of side effects “as an argument not to be vaccinated.”

Also here's a clip of Fauci back in 1999 giving what used to be considered a sensible medical opinion about the importance of testing treatments:



Narrator: Many scientists are beginning to believe that a vaccine against AIDS may be impossible to make and too dangerous to test.

Fauci: If you take it and then a year goes by and everybody is fine. Then you say "OK, that's good, now let's give it to 500 people" and then a year goes by and everything is fine, "well now lets give it to thousands of people" and then you find out it takes 12 years for all hell to break loose [side effects to appear] and then what have you done?

GB News with a ballsy report on SADS. Correlation is not causation.

Safe and effective.
Sudden and unexpected?

A UK-centric documentary on the Covid vaccines and the vaccine injured.

How it started:

Show Spoiler

Show Spoiler

Personally what I'd go by along those lines is looking at lists of how many well known people have been vaccinated. And then seeing how many have died.

Here's one off the top: https://people.com/health/celebrities-a ... ne-photos/ 150 people.

Another paper on the potentially man-made origin of the original Sars-cov-2 virus. Slightly off topic, but I don't think it warrants its own thread.

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/new-evidenc ... ab-origins

The paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 8.512756v1

As Ralph Baric and his colleagues explained way back in 2017, coronaviruses have very long genomes, which “complicate efficient engineering.” If you want to tinker with their genes, you need to create a DNA copy, because DNA is more stable and easier to fiddle with. To do this, Baric recommended using specific restriction enzymes, which create DNA analogues of sections of the RNA genome, demarcated by specific genetic sequences called recognition sites. These shorter DNA building-block sequences can then be individually manipulated or switched out, and then ultimately joined to each other at their “sticky ends” to build the full DNA genome, which can then be transcribed back into the original RNA. Unless you specifically decide to remove them, though, the restriction sites remain in the RNA sequence, like seams in cloth. Naturally occurring coronaviruses also have restriction sites, but these tend to have a more sporadic occurrence. Scientists like Baric therefore preferred to remove some of these natural restriction sites and to add others of their own, so they’d only have to work with a few DNA fragments of roughly equal length. They might also prefer to insert seams around genetic sequences of particular interest. These would make it possible to swap in the genetic code at these crucial sites – to see, for example, how pathogenic a wild-type SARS-2 with Omicron spike might be.

Comparison against a wide variety of other virus genomes reveals that the distribution of these seams, or recognition sites, in SARS-2 is highly anomalous for a natural virus, and totally normal for a synthetic one. That is, SARS-2 has all of its restriction sites exactly where a scientist would find it most convenient to put them, and not where you’d expect them to occur naturally.
...

Back on topic:

https://metatron.substack.com/p/soaring ... -americans

Soaring Deaths of Even Younger Americans.
As bad as the story is for the under 45s, it's a whole lot worse for the under 25s.

Having just written this piece on the alarming rate at which under 45 year-old Americans are dying at unprecedented rates in the aftermath of the mass mRNA experiment, I was piqued to investigate the situation for the under 25s alone.

Alas, the situation is even more grim. Let’s examine the core hypotheses I have developed over the last couple of years, based on the examination of reams of mortality data from all around the world:

Deaths spike in the aftermath of COVID interventions (government policies) more than they do in the apparent emergence of a novel pathogen.

Mortality increases in the aftermath of the mass mRNA experiment more than it does during the alleged emergence of a novel pathogen, “in spite of” the claim that the medical intervention is Safe and Effective™.

Lies, damned lies and statistics. How a literally useless placebo may appear to be useful by some numbers wizardry (4:45):



Many efficacy estimates, particularly those put out by governments use this kind of brainless accounting.

In a related article: Pfizer's vaccine trial data, using the same vaccine efficacy calculation shows a saline injection prevents heart attacks and Bell's Palsy by 75% and 85.7% respectively. Obviously that is nonsense, but that's what you can do with statistics.

This is a big one:

New study shows that pretty much everyone who took the vaccine has some form of heart damage (elevated troponin levels in blood). Fortunately for most, it is sub-clinical.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new- ... retty-much

A new study out of Switzerland shows that vaccinated people have uniformly higher troponin levels than their unvaccinated peers.

In the graph shown at 6:21, we see that the 777 people who got the booster in this study have uniformly higher troponin levels than their matched unvaccinated peers. That is not supposed to happen. If the vaccines are safe, the troponin levels should be nearly identical between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.

Here are Professor Prasad’s exact words:

It's not just the tip of the distribution that has elevated high sensitivity troponin, it's that the entire distribution is right shifted. Everybody's having a little bit of elevation in high sensitivity troponin. That's what this graph would have you infer.

You get a troponin elevation when there is damage to your heart:

Troponin is a type of protein found in the muscles of your heart. Troponin isn't normally found in the blood. When heart muscles become damaged, troponin is sent into the bloodstream. As heart damage increases, greater amounts of troponin are released in the blood

What the study shows is that nearly everyone is getting a little heart damage when they get the COVID vaccine, some get a lot more damage than others.