Mysterious jump in excess mortality among younger cohorts

Post Reply New Topic

I don't know why I bothered posting in this thread, since I don't have time for conspiracy theories anymore...

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/game ... -shows-the

Steve Kirsch finds evidence of the more immediate post-vaccine mortality in some Medicare data. The original data is available for those interested.

Nobody has ever claimed the vaccine reduces all cause mortality below baseline. There is no clinical trial showing that and there is no known mechanism of action whereby introducing a pathogen into your body will reduce all-cause mortality.

The only claim they make now is that the vaccine reduces COVID deaths. Fine. Let’s say that the vax is perfect and reduces every single COVID death, then the slope must still be downwards due to seasonality as we said before. But it’s not.

Professor Jeffrey Morris wrote “temporal HVE” on Twitter, but this is simply a handwaving dismissal of all this work with no evidentiary support whatsoever. HVE refers to healthy vaccinee effect. The “theory” is that the healthiest people get the vaccine first and since those people aren’t likely to die soon, it causes the slope to go upwards. But these are all Medicare patients and they were all vaccinated ASAP come December. What Jeffrey can’t explain is why the slope is even more distinct for people who got their shots in March 2021. Those would be the “stragglers” and thus less healthy, yet the upward slope is even more pronounced than in January. So his “explanation” just doesn’t fit the data. Nice try, no cigar.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urg ... ave-caused

mRNAs jabs may have caused tens of millions of serious new health problems worldwide, a huge peer-reviewed study shows

Covid vaccines are linked to a 20 percent rise in new diagnoses for at least three months after vaccination; a second report finds even higher risks for people with preexisting autoimmune problems

Adults have sharply higher risks of being diagnosed with heart, skin, and psychiatric conditions for at least 90 days after they receive Covid jabs, a peer-reviewed study of almost 300,000 people in California has shown.

The researchers examined new diagnoses given to the same people before and after they were vaccinated to see whether the shots changed the risk of new health problems.

They found that people were about 21 percent more likely to receive a new diagnosis in the three months after a shot, compared to the three months before. With almost 240 million American adults jabbed, the rise translates into millions of extra new medical problems found in the months after vaccination, and tens of millions worldwide.

Serious conditions such as hypertension were about 25 percent more likely to be diagnosed in the three months following a shot than the three months before, the researchers found.

Depression, eczema, diabetes, and cellulitis were 10 to 20 percent more likely.

Myocarditis diagnoses had the highest additional risk. They were about 2.6 times as likely overall, with an even higher risk in men. Myocarditis is a known side effect of the mRNAs, so the fact it had a particularly high rate of extra diagnoses provides strong evidence that the signal the researchers found was real.

Overall, the researchers reported that the 284,000 Covid-vaccinated adults they examined received almost 6,000 additional diagnoses of health conditions in the 90 days after being jabbed compared to the 90 days before.

With about 237 million American adults vaccinated, that estimate would translate into about 5 million extra diagnoses for problems like diabetes in the three months following the shots. Worldwide, the number could be up to 25 million.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urg ... ly-doubled

Birth data from Signapore:

As this chart demonstrates, nearly every Singaporean adult between 20-39 - childbearing age, essentially - received his or her first Covid vaccine jab in June and July 2021. (More than 98 percent of the jabs Singapore gave were mRNAs, though Chinese inactivated virus vaccines were privately available.)

...

The story here is simple.

And worrying.

In March 2022, precisely nine months after mass mRNA vaccinations of women of childbearing age began - births in Singapore plunged, while stillbirths soared.

Are other countries seeing the same trend?

The only other country that I can find that has already published full live birth and stillbirth data for 2022 is Sweden. Sweden had a drop in live births comparable to Singapore in 2022. It also had a similar timing issue, with births rising early in 2022 and then falling nine months after mRNA administration.

But the Swedish rate of stillbirths per live birth was essentially unchanged in 2022, falling about 3 percent.

That lack of a signal is obviously a positive sign, as are results from some other studies. (If you are aware of other countries that have published full or partial 2022 stillbirth data, please email me.)

Still, the Singaporean data are striking enough - both in the size of the increase and its timing - to again raise the question of whether the mRNAs are contributing to an accelerating fertility decline.

Expect governments and scientists to do everything possible NOT to answer this crucial question.

^ Correction to above:

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urg ... o-previous

The technical definition of stillbirth has changed recently in Singapore causing the apparent rise in stillbirths in the data (now we know why it wasn't seen in Sweden). The live birth data however, still appears to be correct.

Australian drug regulator glossed over some vaxx-related deaths to avoid undermining public confidence in the vaccines:

https://rebekahbarnett.substack.com/p/b ... -regulator

Documents obtained under Freedom of Information (FOI) request by Dr Melissa McCann reveal that the TGA appears to have hidden numerous vaccine-induced deaths from the public view, including those of two children.

Dr McCann shared the shocking revelation in her address at the Covid Vaccine Conference, hosted by Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party over the weekend in Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney. The event featured leading ICU physician Dr Pierre Kory, cardiologist and epidemiologist Dr Peter McCullough, and McCullough’s collaborator, author John Leake.

Addressing sold out crowds, Dr McCann shared the extraordinary lengths she had to go to to extract causality assessment documents relating to the TGA’s investigation of reported deaths after Covid vaccination, which were obtained under FOI request in a process that took six months. Dr McCann lodged the request after seeing an unexpectedly high number of patients coming through her clinic experiencing adverse events after immunisation (AEFIs). She also noticed a high number of serious AEFI reports in the in the DAEN database, including the reported death of a 14 year old in October 2021.

So their is now fairly clear evidence of vaccine aligned birth reductions for
Taiwan, Holland, and Australia.

Which suggests that the vaccine harms ovaries and/or embryos, and this harm is cumulative.
Does anyone know if this is being seen in other countries?


https://mandownunder.substack.com/p/tai ... s-20222023

The situation in Taiwan seems to be mirroring the situation in Australia.
The really convicting thing, is that all these countries vaccinated at different times, yet in all them their is a strong temporal association with when vaccination started in that country, which rules out most of the possible alternative explanations.


The Australian governments response to this?
https://phillipaltman.substack.com/p/au ... nvestigate

Their you have it folks, the government that locked an entire nation down for 18 months, over the virus, thinks tens of thousands of unexplained deaths is not worth even a research committee.
Does that prove that their mandatory vaccine caused it? No, proof is a strong word, but it does rather suggest that the government believes that the mandatory vaccine caused it and they have no desire to furnish evidence against themselves.

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/28/pfi ... cientists/

Evidence that 30% of so of vaccines administered in Europe were harmless placebos. The batch theory crowd were on to something.

Unbeknownst to most observers, it is precisely the German regulatory agency, the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), which is, in principle, responsible for quality control of all the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine supply in the EU. (The institute is named after the German immunologist and Nobel Prize winner Paul Ehrlich, not, of course, the Stanford biology professor of the same name.)

This reflects the fact that the actual legal manufacturer of the vaccine, as well as the marketing authorisation holder in the EU, is the German company BioNTech, not its more well-known American partner Pfizer.

Dyker and Matysik found that the PEI had tested and approved for release all the very bad ‘blue’ batches, the overwhelming majority of the not-so-bad ‘green’ batches, but almost none of the harmless ‘yellow’ batches – as if the PEI knew in advance that these batches were unproblematic.

https://okaythennews.substack.com/p/sou ... oves-covid