Oh god, Orange man creates his own social media....

Page 5 of 15 [ 232 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next

Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Oct 2021, 6:41 pm

Misslizard wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
Image


:lmao:

Where do you find these things?
Where do you know where to look? :scratch:

Google images.Image


Only 150?
How many episodes did they make? :mrgreen:



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

21 Oct 2021, 6:43 pm

Oh C'mon----Pepe Le Pew is just a funny cartoon character.

His character was meant to be a mockery of the "Gallic Lover."



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Oct 2021, 6:46 pm

AnonymousAnonymous wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
Image


:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

IMO, "Pumpkin" Trump will always be a sore loser who may never accept the fact
that he wasn't reelected in the 2020 election.


Agreed.
He is a "Karen" "Hillary", for sure. :mrgreen:



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Oct 2021, 6:48 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Oh C'mon----Pepe Le Pew is just a funny cartoon character.

His character was meant to be a mockery of the "Gallic Lover."


Politics perverts reality to service its own agenda. 8)



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,499
Location: Right over your left shoulder

21 Oct 2021, 6:50 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Oh C'mon----Pepe Le Pew is just a funny cartoon character.

His character was meant to be a mockery of the "Gallic Lover."


Is he off limits to be mocked? :chin:
Seem like a weird place to draw the line. The 'Gallic Lover' trope has been a creep by Anglo norms for quite awhile even if it was able to be played for laughs up until recently. The joke only ever worked as a result of culture clash but over time the level of clash has increased to the point it doesn't work as a joke for most audiences anymore.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

21 Oct 2021, 6:55 pm

Nobody should ever take Pepe LePew seriously (I'm not talking about the poster---I'm talking about the cartoon character).

He was meant to be portrayed as having tragic flaws. His cartoons seek to instruct people on how NOT to woo women. He was a fool, not to be taken seriously.

Frankenstein's monster isn't so great, either----but is he being "cancelled"?



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Oct 2021, 7:12 pm

Off Topic
kraftiekortie wrote:
Nobody should ever take Pepe LePew seriously (I'm not talking about the poster---I'm talking about the cartoon character).

He was meant to be portrayed as having tragic flaws. His cartoons seek to instruct people on how NOT to woo women. He was a fool, not to be taken seriously.

Frankenstein's monster isn't so great, either----but is he being "cancelled"?


The main flaw is that he stinks.
You know, because he is a stinky skunk. 8O

Actually, he is quite charming, like Maurice Chevalier, who he was modelled on.
He would have been a chick-magnet if it wasn't for his anal glands.

Notice the odour plume:
Image



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Oct 2021, 7:18 pm

Image

Nice "bubble" arse, btw. :heart: :mrgreen:



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,499
Location: Right over your left shoulder

21 Oct 2021, 7:27 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Nobody should ever take Pepe LePew seriously (I'm not talking about the poster---I'm talking about the cartoon character).

He was meant to be portrayed as having tragic flaws. His cartoons seek to instruct people on how NOT to woo women. He was a fool, not to be taken seriously.

Frankenstein's monster isn't so great, either----but is he being "cancelled"?


Is Frankenstein's monster no longer relevant and largely offensive and not-funny?
Apples =/= oranges.

At this point it's uphill battle if anyone wants to rehabilitate the character because his whole shtick is being a creep and not many people laugh at that bit anymore. He's basically season 1 Apu, the character only exists to be part of a joke that not many people find funny anymore.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

21 Oct 2021, 7:51 pm

Cornflake wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Given there is no requirement to see posts from Mr Zuckerberg on Facebook, or from Mr Dorsey on Twitter, it would be interesting to see if Mr trump follows the same example
What now - Trump, with his own shiny new megaphone - and not using it? :lol: I expect he'll use it like he used Twitter to post bragging, lies and infantile whining.


There's no doubt he'll be posting there, but I'm not sure he'll be making it compulsary to see those posts unless you "follow" him there, or go to the specific post.

Cornflake wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
- if so, the site may be reasonable: it will simply be a platform where you can choose to see\not see whichever users you choose...and those who dislike Mr Trump can, theoretically, use it simply to add a "cost", however small, to Mr Trump for the services which they use (storage\bandwidth\other server related expences.
I'm interested to see if posts against Trump will be allowed to remain there: he's notoriously thin-skinned and unlikely to have any tolerance for criticism - as in real life. Then again I don't think he ever replied to posts on his Twitter feed, which gave the impression he was just using it as a write-only service, so this may go the same way.
He's already asking for money, so it would be surprising if he didn't use this new platform for the same.

I doubt there would be any issue with posts against him (as a site-wide policy), instead relying on an his individual ability to remove posts to\replys on his personal page (or block users from accessing\posting to it), although even then some may remain under an "I don't mind what they say, it's more important that they are talking about me" approach, showing he is still "relevent" to people - Judging by their posts, he is very "relevent" to some on this site...

As to asking for money - were the requests for money related to running the site (understandable, given it is another organisation, rather than him personally, who owns\operates it, and would need funds until advertising (or some other source of funds) commences to help cover costs, or was the fundraising for him\political reasons (which, if connected to this new site would be questionable)?

Cornflake wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
If, however, viewing his posts (or fundraising requests) is "mandatory", then it will certainly limit the number of people willing to use it (although there would still be the potential for 70+ million users).
Ah yes, that's the bigger question: will anyone really be interested in it? His earlier blog failed through lack of interest, and that was basically a Trump monolog service.
He may run it as free for reading and charge a fee for posting privileges. But if it just ends up as a "rah rah Trump" echo-chamber I wouldn't expect that to have much holding power - especially if there's a charge for it.


I'm not expecting it to be subscription based, nor have any requirement to see his posts (worst case I would expect is that new accounts may "follow" his by default, but that this can be stopped by a user, and I don't think the site would even have that)... More likely, it will be a case of taking his favourite features of other platforms and trying to combine them into one platform in order to draw users from those platforms onto this. How well that works out will be interesting to see, given many people may create accounts there, but primarily\solely use the previous sites rather than this new one due to their "contacts" (and history, etc.) already being there...



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Oct 2021, 7:56 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Nobody should ever take Pepe LePew seriously (I'm not talking about the poster---I'm talking about the cartoon character).

He was meant to be portrayed as having tragic flaws. His cartoons seek to instruct people on how NOT to woo women. He was a fool, not to be taken seriously.

Frankenstein's monster isn't so great, either----but is he being "cancelled"?


Is Frankenstein's monster no longer relevant and largely offensive and not-funny?
Apples =/= oranges.

At this point it's uphill battle if anyone wants to rehabilitate the character because his whole shtick is being a creep and not many people laugh at that bit anymore. He's basically season 1 Apu, the character only exists to be part of a joke that not many people find funny anymore.


"Woke" people may not find him funny.
If you haven't guessed, I'm not "woke". 8)

You guys take yourselves too seriously.
And many on the left have a poor sense of humour. 8O



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Oct 2021, 8:00 pm

Brictoria wrote:
I doubt there would be any issue with posts against him (as a site-wide policy), instead relying on an his individual ability to remove posts to\replys on his personal page (or block users from accessing\posting to it), although even then some may remain under an "I don't mind what they say, it's more important that they are talking about me" approach, showing he is still "relevent" to people - Judging by their posts, he is very "relevent" to some on this site...


Are you suggesting he might censor posts through deletion?



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,499
Location: Right over your left shoulder

21 Oct 2021, 8:06 pm

Pepe wrote:
"Woke" people may not find him funny.
If you haven't guessed, I'm not "woke". 8)

You guys take yourselves too seriously.
And many on the left have a poor sense of humour. 8O


You're also old, I'm bordering on too old for media companies to care about my eyeballs so our opinions aren't the ones they're listening to. Ask younger people how they feel about Pepe Le Pew.

Also, if the left have a poor sense of humour why are there so few right-wing comedians outside of the niche of 'right wing comedy'? Left wing comedians tend to also be mainstream comedians and not have to rely on pandering to niche audiences like Steven Crowder or the guys Fox News hires to challenge late night shows.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,471
Location: Aux Arcs

21 Oct 2021, 8:08 pm

Pepe wrote:
Image

Nice "bubble" arse, btw. :heart: :mrgreen:

You better lay off that viagra.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

21 Oct 2021, 8:35 pm

Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
I doubt there would be any issue with posts against him (as a site-wide policy), instead relying on an his individual ability to remove posts to\replys on his personal page (or block users from accessing\posting to it), although even then some may remain under an "I don't mind what they say, it's more important that they are talking about me" approach, showing he is still "relevent" to people - Judging by their posts, he is very "relevent" to some on this site...


Are you suggesting he might censor posts through deletion?


Possibly, depending on how the site is designed, but only on "his" page - I doubt that fnord, or others with similar views, would have much risk of their opinions about Mr Trump which were posted on their own accounts\pages on that site being removed... Doubtless fnord will wish to inform everyone should this occur on his account there.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,790
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

21 Oct 2021, 8:40 pm

Misslizard wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Image

Nice "bubble" arse, btw. :heart: :mrgreen:

You better lay off that viagra.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer