Dr Fauci's love of dogs
Instead, go after the legislation that permits it to happen - I doubt this is the only lab using animals in experiments.
You mean, have laws such as this implemented:
The Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture Act (PACT) is a bipartisan initiative that bans the intentional crushing, burning, drowning, suffocating, impalement or other serious harm to "living non-human mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians."
The law also bans "animal crush videos," meaning any photograph, motion picture film, video or digital recording or electronic image that depicts animal cruelty.
The penalty for violating the law can include a fine, a prison term of up to seven years or both.
[...]
The new law was endorsed by some law enforcement groups, such as the National Sheriffs' Association and the Fraternal Order of Police, who say there is a link between extreme animal cruelty and violence against people.
Source: https://www.npr.org/2019/11/25/782842651/trump-signs-law-making-cruelty-to-animals-a-federal-crime
Depending on the wording used in that legislation, "Other serious harm" would seem an apprpropriate description of what was occurring.
That would certainly appear to fit but I suspect there exists other legislation specifically permitting the use of animals in experiments and clearly defining boundaries of what may and may not be done to them.
In that context, the word "necessary" unfortunately carries a lot of weight.
If PACT had intended to include that usage it would have surely addressed it and made it clear, possibly even as a more detailed section specifically dealing with the use of animals in labs.
I think the whole thing is horrible beyond words. How anyone could fix caps containing flies over the eyes of any animal for any reason is utterly sickening.
_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.
Instead, go after the legislation that permits it to happen - I doubt this is the only lab using animals in experiments.
You mean, have laws such as this implemented:
The Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture Act (PACT) is a bipartisan initiative that bans the intentional crushing, burning, drowning, suffocating, impalement or other serious harm to "living non-human mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians."
The law also bans "animal crush videos," meaning any photograph, motion picture film, video or digital recording or electronic image that depicts animal cruelty.
The penalty for violating the law can include a fine, a prison term of up to seven years or both.
[...]
The new law was endorsed by some law enforcement groups, such as the National Sheriffs' Association and the Fraternal Order of Police, who say there is a link between extreme animal cruelty and violence against people.
Source: https://www.npr.org/2019/11/25/782842651/trump-signs-law-making-cruelty-to-animals-a-federal-crime
Depending on the wording used in that legislation, "Other serious harm" would seem an apprpropriate description of what was occurring.
From memory fauci moved his inhumane experientation to Tunisia where there are no animal cruelty laws protecting them.
The guy is human feces, in my book.
I think I will call him "The Brown Man".
Do you have any links?
Maybe the article in the first post of the thread which included the (already quoted):
Once again, helpless beagles are drugged, but this time, their heads were locked in mesh cages filled with hundreds of infected sand flies.
Do you have any links?
Maybe the article in the first post of the thread which included the (already quoted):
Once again, helpless beagles are drugged, but this time, their heads were locked in mesh cages filled with hundreds of infected sand flies.
The disgusting pig.
I would like to do the same to him.
BTW, my credibility has been re-confirmed.
I related the information correctly, and virtually always do.
If I don't know something I will say so.
And if I am wrong, I will say so. But not about that pig.
Once again, helpless beagles are drugged, but this time, their heads were locked in mesh cages filled with hundreds of infected sand flies.
But is that actually what happened as a result of the partial grant? Or is it that just part of a grant was given to a lab in Tunisia, period?
It's certainly an implication from the somewhat over-excited White Coat Waste article, that as a direct result of the partial funding more dogs were used in experiments, but I don't see anything there to substantiate it.
It's a little confusing. On the one hand the article states, with reference to the lab in Tunisia, "Once again, helpless beagles are drugged, but this time, their heads were locked in mesh cages filled with hundreds of infected sand flies." as if it's a new horror made possible by the grant, while on the other hand the article states elsewhere "In the basement of NIAID’s lab in Bethesda, Maryland, infectious sand flies were strapped to beagles (...)"
I'm left wondering if it's one, both, or neither.
I'd also prefer to see an unobstructed version of this:
I can see a reference to metronidazole, an antibiotic, but nothing else.
A cordectomy is a surgical procedure which removes part or all of the vocal cords, typically in people for cases of laryngeal cancer, and not "some of the cruelest treatment imaginable". Vocal chords are not "slashed".
Not that this justifies in any way its use on dogs, just to stop barking, but the sensationalist language is again unnecessary and emotionally leading.
This, at the foot of the article, leaves me doubting the motives of the site:
But for the avoidance of doubt and overriding it all, I'd like to see no animals used for any experiments anywhere.
It's abhorrent and in many cases, totally unnecessary.
_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.
It's abhorrent and in many cases, totally unnecessary.
This one in particular:
Records show the dogs were “vocalizing in pain” during the experiments, before being killed.
The worst part? The experiments were completely unnecessary. Experimenters admitted that the drug they were studying “has been extensively tested and confirmed…in different animal models such as mice…Mongolian gerbils…and rhesus macaques….”
Well, it didn't take long for the satirical websites to get started:
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Dr. Anthony Fauci is embroiled in controversy over his organization reportedly funding an experiment in which dogs had their heads trapped in cages and were eaten by sandflies alive, which we are told is a perfectly normal procedure performed by scientists as well as psychopathic killers in horror movies.
Fauci is hoping that the uproar over the dogs will distract everyone from something he did that was far worse: perform experiments on the populace of the United States for the past eighteen months.
"Now that everyone's upset about the puppies, maybe they'll forget about how I played god with their lives for the last year and a half," he confided to a friend, according to an anonymous source. "Everyone loves puppies. Well, except me, because I'm an evil bad guy. But people get real mad when you kill dogs for some reason. They'll get upset about this and probably try to cancel me. You know, this whole 'cancel culture' thing is really getting out of hand. You torture and murder a few dozen puppies and suddenly everyone's out to get you."
But Fauci went on to say that he thinks it's a positive development in the end, as "people have really short attention spans and they'll forget that I did something way worse than off a few dumb dogs—I experimented with the lives of 330 million people and got away with it scot-free."
Fauci then got in his evil Zeppelin and flew off to his Lair of Evilness to hatch his next villainous plot.
Source: https://babylonbee.com/news/fauci-hopes-his-experiments-on-puppies-will-distract-everyone-from-experiments-he-performed-on-humanity-for-past-18-months
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Gabapentin for Dogs: Use, Dosage & Side Effects |
02 Apr 2024, 7:02 pm |
Falling In Love |
01 Mar 2024, 5:40 am |
Autistic Love Songs |
20 Apr 2024, 12:19 am |
I LOVE HANDYCAM RECORDERS |
09 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm |