Page 3 of 6 [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

r00tb33r
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2016
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,937
Location: Virginia

15 Mar 2022, 5:32 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
As she's having so much fun as Fox's token Dem, let's see how much she'd enjoy switching to an R behind her name.

AFAIK she doesn't hold office anymore. So no more letters for her. It seems she intends to stay active in politics, but she says risky things unpopular with either party...


_________________
I've reached the end.


txfz1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2021
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,411
Location: US

15 Mar 2022, 8:07 am

Kraichgauer wrote:

I was, first and foremost, giving a quick synopsis about what the article is about. That is, Romney and Kinzinger calling her message treasonous. Admittedly, I might have gotten carried away expressing my dislike of Ms. Gabbard.
For the record, I never had a high opinion of her. I am aware that men on the right are easily swayed by superficial looks, which is why the brainless Fox bimbos are so popular.


Too funny, you generalize about fox bimbos yet failed to understand the state department just testified there are 25+ US backed labs in danger. It appears your news source is the one failing to inform as you thought Gabbard was misinforming. Then you insult the men on the right for being easily swayed. Too funny.



VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

15 Mar 2022, 9:05 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
By the way, I took another look at the article I originally posted, and I fail to see what I'm wrong about. Romney and Kinzinger both called what she said treasonous. How did I misreport that? That she might or might not be correct isn't the point.


Again, these are not Putin's bio labs, nor is anyone accusing Gabbard of defending them even if they were.

Your opening statement was completely wrong. Why can't you just admit it? You can still agree that her words were treasonous, even if it's a completely ridiculous claim.


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 29,847

15 Mar 2022, 3:27 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Both Kinzinger and Romney call Tulsi Gabbard's defense of Putin's bio lab claims in Ukraine


Did you even read the story in the link you posted?


Of course I did. And I also know that Gabbard has a reputation of being a gadfly interested in promoting herself at the expense of her party and it's political ideals.


I think she should be an independent


As she's having so much fun as Fox's token Dem, let's see how much she'd enjoy switching to an R behind her name.


I know why she hasn't switched. She's a practicing hindu which would be unpalatable to MAGA christian fanatics. They would prefer a Nicky Haley who is an Indian masquerading as a white conservative christian woman.



VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

15 Mar 2022, 4:00 pm

cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Both Kinzinger and Romney call Tulsi Gabbard's defense of Putin's bio lab claims in Ukraine


Did you even read the story in the link you posted?


Of course I did. And I also know that Gabbard has a reputation of being a gadfly interested in promoting herself at the expense of her party and it's political ideals.


I think she should be an independent


As she's having so much fun as Fox's token Dem, let's see how much she'd enjoy switching to an R behind her name.


I know why she hasn't switched. She's a practicing hindu which would be unpalatable to MAGA christian fanatics. They would prefer a Nicky Haley who is an Indian masquerading as a white conservative christian woman.


Or perhaps the reason might be that she's not a conservative.

Just because she hammers the Democratic Party does not mean she aligns with the right-wing. My issues with Gabbard is that she didn't hammer them hard enough, and sold out to the DNC too many times.

I'd never support her again for those reasons. Still, she was correct on the bio labs.


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,307
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Mar 2022, 5:03 pm

VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
By the way, I took another look at the article I originally posted, and I fail to see what I'm wrong about. Romney and Kinzinger both called what she said treasonous. How did I misreport that? That she might or might not be correct isn't the point.


Again, these are not Putin's bio labs, nor is anyone accusing Gabbard of defending them even if they were.

Your opening statement was completely wrong. Why can't you just admit it? You can still agree that her words were treasonous, even if it's a completely ridiculous claim.


I NEVER said they were Putin's bio labs, I said they were his accusations about bio labs.
As I understand it, Putin is saying these labs are creating contagions for biological warfare. Gabbard's claims are occurring at the same time as Tucker Carlson parroting Putin's bullsh*t, which to me seems to imply she's trying to ride in on his coat tails for a little attention.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,307
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Mar 2022, 5:05 pm

Veg-

Nah, she's just a self serving gadfly.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,307
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Mar 2022, 5:05 pm

cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Both Kinzinger and Romney call Tulsi Gabbard's defense of Putin's bio lab claims in Ukraine


Did you even read the story in the link you posted?


Of course I did. And I also know that Gabbard has a reputation of being a gadfly interested in promoting herself at the expense of her party and it's political ideals.


I think she should be an independent


As she's having so much fun as Fox's token Dem, let's see how much she'd enjoy switching to an R behind her name.


I know why she hasn't switched. She's a practicing hindu which would be unpalatable to MAGA christian fanatics. They would prefer a Nicky Haley who is an Indian masquerading as a white conservative christian woman.


I think you're on to something.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


txfz1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2021
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,411
Location: US

15 Mar 2022, 6:18 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
txfz1 wrote:
It's more than that the data and people need to be protected. MT and AK should be held accountable their rhetoric.

Tell me again about the 81 million voters and how Biden immediately froze the weapons allotted for Ukraine after meeting with Putin.


Uh... what?


What are you confused about? The pathogen data, 81 million voters, the 16 June 2021 meeting, or the 18 June 2021 freeze of weapons to Ukraine?



VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

15 Mar 2022, 6:27 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
By the way, I took another look at the article I originally posted, and I fail to see what I'm wrong about. Romney and Kinzinger both called what she said treasonous. How did I misreport that? That she might or might not be correct isn't the point.


Again, these are not Putin's bio labs, nor is anyone accusing Gabbard of defending them even if they were.

Your opening statement was completely wrong. Why can't you just admit it? You can still agree that her words were treasonous, even if it's a completely ridiculous claim.


I NEVER said they were Putin's bio labs, I said they were his accusations about bio labs


No, that's not what you said. No matter how hard you try, you can't escape the BS of your opening statement. Sorry, but you can't verbally contort your way out of this.


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 23,080
Location: Australia

15 Mar 2022, 6:31 pm

VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
By the way, I took another look at the article I originally posted, and I fail to see what I'm wrong about. Romney and Kinzinger both called what she said treasonous. How did I misreport that? That she might or might not be correct isn't the point.


Again, these are not Putin's bio labs, nor is anyone accusing Gabbard of defending them even if they were.

Your opening statement was completely wrong. Why can't you just admit it? You can still agree that her words were treasonous, even if it's a completely ridiculous claim.


My friend is "resilient". :mrgreen:


_________________
Laughter is the best medicine. Age-appropriate behaviour is an arbitrary NT social construct.
Don't tell me white lies. Gaslight me at your peril. Don't give me your bad attitude. Hypnosis, psychosis. Tomarto, tomayto. There are *4* lights. Honey badger.
If I'm so bad, pass me by. ;)


And one more thing,



Also, as George Carlin said, "I have no stake in the outcome." I'll stick around for the comedy.

"A stranger is a friend gang-stalker you haven't met yet."
Truth may be inconvenient but it is never politically incorrect...The Oracle of Truth has spoken...8)
Glory to Ukraine.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 23,080
Location: Australia

15 Mar 2022, 6:34 pm

VegetableMan wrote:
cyberdad wrote:

I know why she hasn't switched. She's a practicing hindu which would be unpalatable to MAGA christian fanatics. They would prefer a Nicky Haley who is an Indian masquerading as a white conservative christian woman.


Or perhaps the reason might be that she's not a conservative.

Just because she hammers the Democratic Party does not mean she aligns with the right-wing. My issues with Gabbard is that she didn't hammer them hard enough, and sold out to the DNC too many times.

I'd never support her again for those reasons. Still, she was correct on the bio labs.


Non-partisanship confuses a lot of people.
I know from first-hand experience. ;)


_________________
Laughter is the best medicine. Age-appropriate behaviour is an arbitrary NT social construct.
Don't tell me white lies. Gaslight me at your peril. Don't give me your bad attitude. Hypnosis, psychosis. Tomarto, tomayto. There are *4* lights. Honey badger.
If I'm so bad, pass me by. ;)


And one more thing,



Also, as George Carlin said, "I have no stake in the outcome." I'll stick around for the comedy.

"A stranger is a friend gang-stalker you haven't met yet."
Truth may be inconvenient but it is never politically incorrect...The Oracle of Truth has spoken...8)
Glory to Ukraine.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,307
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Mar 2022, 10:32 pm

VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
By the way, I took another look at the article I originally posted, and I fail to see what I'm wrong about. Romney and Kinzinger both called what she said treasonous. How did I misreport that? That she might or might not be correct isn't the point.


Again, these are not Putin's bio labs, nor is anyone accusing Gabbard of defending them even if they were.

Your opening statement was completely wrong. Why can't you just admit it? You can still agree that her words were treasonous, even if it's a completely ridiculous claim.


I NEVER said they were Putin's bio labs, I said they were his accusations about bio labs


No, that's not what you said. No matter how hard you try, you can't escape the BS of your opening statement. Sorry, but you can't verbally contort your way out of this.


Yes, it was. Reading comprehension! And Thpppttt!


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,307
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Mar 2022, 10:34 pm

Pepe wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
By the way, I took another look at the article I originally posted, and I fail to see what I'm wrong about. Romney and Kinzinger both called what she said treasonous. How did I misreport that? That she might or might not be correct isn't the point.


Again, these are not Putin's bio labs, nor is anyone accusing Gabbard of defending them even if they were.

Your opening statement was completely wrong. Why can't you just admit it? You can still agree that her words were treasonous, even if it's a completely ridiculous claim.


My friend is "resilient". :mrgreen:


Well, show you're not partisan and give me a little support. You have to know I didn't say the alleged bio labs were Putin's!


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,307
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Mar 2022, 10:36 pm

txfz1 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
txfz1 wrote:
It's more than that the data and people need to be protected. MT and AK should be held accountable their rhetoric.

Tell me again about the 81 million voters and how Biden immediately froze the weapons allotted for Ukraine after meeting with Putin.


Uh... what?


What are you confused about? The pathogen data, 81 million voters, the 16 June 2021 meeting, or the 18 June 2021 freeze of weapons to Ukraine?


Again, I give the adult response of: "Thpppttt!"


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 23,080
Location: Australia

15 Mar 2022, 11:06 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
By the way, I took another look at the article I originally posted, and I fail to see what I'm wrong about. Romney and Kinzinger both called what she said treasonous. How did I misreport that? That she might or might not be correct isn't the point.


Again, these are not Putin's bio labs, nor is anyone accusing Gabbard of defending them even if they were.

Your opening statement was completely wrong. Why can't you just admit it? You can still agree that her words were treasonous, even if it's a completely ridiculous claim.


My friend is "resilient". :mrgreen:


Well, show you're not partisan and give me a little support. You have to know I didn't say the alleged bio labs were Putin's!


I wasn't paying much attention.
I was sitting back and eating popcorn. :mrgreen:

I might have a closer look. 8)


_________________
Laughter is the best medicine. Age-appropriate behaviour is an arbitrary NT social construct.
Don't tell me white lies. Gaslight me at your peril. Don't give me your bad attitude. Hypnosis, psychosis. Tomarto, tomayto. There are *4* lights. Honey badger.
If I'm so bad, pass me by. ;)


And one more thing,



Also, as George Carlin said, "I have no stake in the outcome." I'll stick around for the comedy.

"A stranger is a friend gang-stalker you haven't met yet."
Truth may be inconvenient but it is never politically incorrect...The Oracle of Truth has spoken...8)
Glory to Ukraine.