DanielW wrote:
The increase in sightings is merely do to the increase in the number of alarmists with cell phones...nothing to fret over.
Easy to spout in a dismissive manner but how easy to legitimately document that there is no actual increase in numbers of the things including the number of unsighted ones?
I'm not going to pass judgement until there is peer-reviewed science on the number of unsighted versus sighted from history to the present.
Somewhere I once came across material expressing that there is an intelligence driving the thing and that throughout history the way it manifested, was presented, has changed with the times and the current technology.
The author/speaker did detail how the performance and described details of what was seen has evolved as humanity developed balloons and then engine-powered heavier-than-air flight.
And how, yes, the source of that apparent evolution could be either the thing itself, or the minds and knowledge of the observers, or a varying mix of both.
Right now I'm not sure if it was a thing they stated outright or my own deduction from the worldview they presented, but if an intelligence is driving the thing for whatever reasons it has, then it could be expected that intelligence might increase the number of presentations as the ability to record those presentations increased.
I'm pretty sure the author/speaker did say something along the lines of "There seem to be times where this thing wants to be seen and will give you what you expect to see." and that in contrast there are also events where the observer had no existing desire to see or encounter such a thing and was left deeply unsettled and disturbed by the experience.
I guess it would be safe to say that the only absolute in the thing is that there are no universal absolutes in the thing.
_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011