MatchboxVagabond wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
^
I was responding to your ambiguous previous response (which the site software forced me to delete because of the limit of three nested quotes). Which lady does it speak volumes about (Gabbard, or Harris)?
Apparently, a bunch of BS that wasn't at all relevant to what I posted in the first place.
Well...to a third party reader, like me, it sounded like he was
agreeing with you that...what one lady said about the other "spoke volumes" (ie revealed something bad) about-either that lady herself, or about the other lady in question. So I wondered which lady (Gabbard or Harris) he was ganging up with you against.
But apparently he was trying to say the opposite and was actually DIS agreeing with you. Because you revealed yourself to him as being a Gabbard supporter. Which he (rightly or wrongly) disapproved of.
So ...kids...learn to post clearly on WP pweeeze!