naturalplastic wrote:
Sounds like the evidence is about as strong as that for Barron Trump (45's son) being autistic. Zillions on WP were convinced that Barron was autistic solely because when he was 10 he would play with a fidget spinner while his daddy did speeches. We all know that NT kids are riveted by political speeches when they are ten.
Some autistic guy posted a video of Barron fidgeting at his dad’s 3AM victory speech as under the title of “ Barron Trump Autistic? if so – what an amazing opportunity to bring attention to the AUTISM epidemic”. Rosie O’Donnell reposted the video and it went viral. Melania got a lawyer and Rosie apologized. Also Melania stayed in New York to let Barron complete the year in the same school. This was described as “evidence” they were hiding Barron’s “autism” in shame. Anyway on WP the controversy was more about was it appropriate to use the 10 year old first son to destigmatize autism than if Barron is autistic. I very strongly was against the idea and supported Melania.
Anyway Kamala’s situation is completely different from Barron’s. She is a 59 old running for the highest elected office in the land, not a 10 year old in a situation he had no part in creating.
The flimsy evidence about Barron is more than the evidence the Kamala at this point. It would be great and I would be thrilled if she is autistic. Wanting something to be true is not evidence.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman