Why are people so cruel to me?

Post Reply New Topic

Talk to the crow.

I have no idea what that term means. Talk to the crow?

It is not termonology.

What does it mean? I talk to birds, even crows. I thought I was the only one.

They see death. They have answers.

OK then. Can you tell me what fish think when they look up and see a crow flying overhead?

No clue. Animals, and humans usually naturally do not pay much attention to crows. They are overlooked alot.

I had about a 50 inch musky turn half sideways, and stare right into my eye. That was a rather strange experience. Superior freshwater preditor. It made me feel like I just got owned.

CRows are very intelligent. They say crows remember human faces, especially the faces of human who have tried to harm them, and even communicate to other crows about specific human beings, so that crows who have never seen the evil person before will recognize thm on sight. I have also seen ordinary sparrows learn to activate motions sensors on supermarket automatic doors and gaining entrance to stores by fluttering in a stationary position in front of the sensor until the door opens, when no human is close enough to be involved

Have you ever noticed how annoying a crow looks to other birds? You see them as black, but to other birds, they are not. Some will try not to look at them.

This is getting off topic.

What, they don't believe in gravity? That would explain so much.

It is not gravity. The theory is wrong. It is grabbity. Because it grabs you, and pulls you down. It is an outside force that is grabbing you, and pulling you down. It is controlling your every move, because you cannot go up.

Thinkinginpictures, don't mind about it. Ask, search, speculate. We all stand on an unknown land. It's not mine neither yours truth that will ever govern the universe.

thinkinginpictures,
as long as have spoken to them in a respectful,non arrogant way then have not done anything to warrant the rudeness on that thread so woud suggest leaving that community as it isnt worth the stress on mental health.
people behave very hive minded there and use ridicule to deflect away from the point [havent read what the original post was] instead of allowing to question things, which is funny as athiests have often hated supporters of traditional religeons for being hive minded and not allowing anything different to be said of their religeon.

perhaps shoud find a more relaxed forum but it might be worth taking a break first from religeous forums to release stress first as these types of forums get pretty rowdy,am always taking breaks from WP when pain is to much.

There is no evidence that gravity exists extrinsically to the universe, and therefore it is not an outside force, meaning literally a force outside the universe.

...or was that sarcasm?

Actually, it's possible that we're not being pulled down by an extant force so much as we are being pushed down by the curvature of space around our planet.
Everything's a matter of perspective, really.
Ask Einstein, he'd tell you that it's all relative.

I think where your argument goes a bit astray is in the assertion that what is understood as quantum entanglement is actually an example of predestination. While it is possible that you are correct (i don't think you are, but what do i know?) if you are correct, then quite a few physicists who have spent their lives studying QM are barking up the wrong tree.

The problem with the predestination idea is that it doesn't provide a reasonable explanation of how the events could be predetermined. The goal of physics is to understand the how the univere actually works. Claiming that entanglement is wrong but providing no explanation why your idea should be prefered is exactly what leafplant described at the start; you come in like a four year old claiming you have the answers to a group that long ago may have considered and rejected that idea. You are claiming that most physicists are wrong but you don't seem aware that you haven't even begun to address how your idea could explain how the universe works on a mechanical level.

It seems to me that you are upset that your idea was not accepted uncritically. You seem to want unchallenged acceptance of your ideas, but you do not feel compelled to provide a clear, structured argument as to why your ideas might have any validity. You seem to interpret this as cruelty. But from the perspective of a person who is interested in getting closer to the truth, wouldn't it be cruel to happily let you persue a poorly thought out concept without provideing the challenges to it that might force you to really think out the idea?

If a person believed that they did not need to eat and could survive wholely on sunlight, would it be more cruel to let them persist in their misguided beliefs and let them die of starvation or to make them come face to face with their own misguided beliefs and help them learn from their mistakes so they might survive?

While people very well might be openly ridiculing you for presenting an idea that is not clearly thought out or supported by any evidence, it might be said that they are helping to force you to really refine your ideas. Maybe it is cruel, but it seems they are being cruel to you because you are demanding acceptance of an idea that you haven't made the effort to fully support. Their cruelty might just be a harsh way of guiding you toward better thinking.