dupertuis wrote:
Both my wife and my daughter talk about ghosts in our home as if they see them roaming the hall in slippers and bathrobe. I look into empty space and go, "Okaaaaay."
I'm open-minded on the subject, but I can't pick up the vibes of the living, much less the departed!
How about you? Any aspies here with that sixth sense?
dp
Ugh.
I have the same problem. I've been in apartments that my mother and sister swore were "haunted," but me, being a night owl who is prone to staying awake by myself until the wee hours of the morning, I never saw any ghosties or beasties.
I think it was Carl Sagan who said, "There are no haunted houses, only haunted people."

Quote:
I did not say that. I said (or I meant to say) there is no practical difference between a non-existent and something that has no detectable effects. And many of the things we think we detect of boojums created by misidentification. For example, ghosts.
Yes.
There is currently no reason for me to "believe" in ghosts. At some point we may invent an instrument that can detect the presence of what we commonly call "ghosts," but that is speculative. There is currently no more reason for me to "believe" that the dead walk the Earth then there is for me to believe in angels, demons, bunyips, bigfoot, alien abductions, or gods. Evidence first, belief later.
Currently, there are many much more mundane explanations for "ghosts." When in doubt, whip out Occum's Razor. In any case, science primarily concerns itself with the measurable physical world. If these "ghosts" are not physical or measurable, there will never be a reason for me to believe in them unless I see one for myself, and can be convinced it was a "ghost" in the traditional sense and not a peculiar neurological "brain fart."
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)