Well first, I think in the beginning what often happens is most of our first experiences with Asperger's, along with all the popular misconceptions, gives us a fairly strange, limited grasp on what it truly involves. Not to mention, there is the unfortunate but very real discomfort that we inherently feel when we encounter things out of the 'ordinary.'
However, I also think that a strong case could be made for Asperger's to be considered a 'disability' in that, quite simply, it seems individuals with Asperger's have an inherent disadvantage 'fitting in' and doing certain things the majority of society finds easy, or doesn't even think twice about.
Quote:
"The truth is that socialization, NT socialization is based on arbitrary social conventions which are irrational.. "
Quite irrational, maybe. 'Arbitrary' seems like poor word choice here. It would seem to me that many of the more underlying social concepts have evolved quite naturally in the face of how the NT brain functions.
Quote:
"To NT's, anyone who doesn't act like an NT, is broken, and therefore must be shunned, pitty-ed, or cured."
I just want to take the opportunity to remind that the NT/Aspie thing is essentially a two-way street. One of the defining characteristics of Asperger's is that inability to empathize, understand how other people are thinking and feeling, etc... which more or less means that to NTs like myself, the behavior of those with Asperger's is extremely difficult to 'understand' in a meaningful manner. We cannot really live in your shoes any more than you can in ours, and that's really what makes for all the frustration, anger, anxiety, etc in the first place.
Quote:
Don't you want to be healthy? If you have autism then that means that something is malfunctioning. And that's not something you should want for yourself. "
As somebody who has suffered from depression in the past and had a plethora of friends with ADHD, I think this issue becomes very, very interesting, and the major problem is that it's easy to fall into black/white thinking. Whether or not we call these things 'disorders to be fixed' or 'differences' is not necessarily mutually exclusive, and the search for 'treatments' doesn't necessarily conflict with either definition. I know ADHD people who just want to live with it, as well as those that go to great lengths to find treatment. I mean, imagine a hypothetical 'miracle drug' for asperger's. An aspie takes it, and for 8 hours, is more or less NT. I'm sure plenty of aspies would herald it as miracle treatment and take it religiously. I'm sure some might use it occasionally, some might try it and hate it, and some might refuse it entirely.
Now where does that put the net effect on the Asperger's community? I'm not really sure, but the point is that trying to draw these lines hard-and-fast just doesn't get us very far. Our definition of something being 'wrong' or 'malfunctioning' is fairly fluid and probably very different from person to person, including amongst those that have Asperger's. So, I dunno. I really don't. And I have to leave now, so I have to end this post. But I'll be checking it back to see where the discussion goes.