Emoal6 wrote:
Hey, WHO TOLD ANYONE TO BE PASSIVE? Theres no correlation to what you quoted me saying and "passivity". But you sure the hell dont go INSTIGATING! Guess what, you instigate it, you've GIVEN THEM THE RIGHT TO DO WHAT THEY WANT TO! You're obviously not far enough along the road to realize this yet. You dont go walking around annoying people for the fun of it, or "cause you think they deserve it".
Someone messes with you, you say hey, Im not in the mood today. Or Haha, funny, good one, in a patronizing way. and then when they continue, YOU DRY GULCH THEM. In other words, while they're still talking sh**, you hit em in the throat real quick, without any warning. That person wont mess with you anymore, cause they now know you have no boundaries, no limits. Its either that or kick them in the balls and then the face. You leave an ever lasting message of I wont hold back if you mess with me.
But you sure the hell dont lead them into a situation where they can just treat you like sh** and you say "I'll tell on you". What are you, in kindergarten? and soon enough, IN THE REAL WORLD, you dont do anything, you just deal with it cause you cant hit them when you're 18 or older. You cant stop them, only stop yourself from reacting. But at least in high school you can leave a permanent message in someones head saying "i got punked by my target, Im a loser" in their head and all their friends.
My bad! I was just quoting an article and it happened to describe a person as saying "I'll tell on you". What you say makes sense. What I was suggesting was for kids to instigate their tormentors into physically attacking so they have a justification to fight back in the eyes of the school and in the eyes of the law. That was my reasoning. Self-defense is seen as the only justification of physical force. Like it or not, we may have to manipulate our way around the rules. In any case my words may have been a bit foolish. It's far better, if possible, not to let it escalate.