Tuttle wrote:
Sometimes I wonder whether we actually have more passive people on here, or whether people want to be passive because its more autistic than the other subtypes that get diagnosed with AS, or whether people aren't understanding that subtype as much.
It's not so extreme in this as it has been in other threads where these have came up, but every time it comes up, passive has been the most common one listed, while its supposed to be the rarest of the subtypes.
My guess is that few people are pure one subtype, and people latch onto the sentence "Recognition of their autism depends more on observing the absence of the social and creative aspects of normal development than the presence of positive abnormalities."
Is it really the "rarest," or is it just the least diagnosed?
I've spoken many times about how I was abnormally well-behaved as a child, and how I suspect it was one of the primary reasons I didn't get DXed until 26. Socially, I never "initiated" anything. I was a rag doll.
I would disagree that "passive" seems "more autistic." If anything, "active/odd" is the stereotypical Aspergers presentation, and "aloof" aligns with Rain Man.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)