FranzOren wrote:
Yes, but if NTs hear the word 'Spectrum" there is 99.99% chance that they will be confused and ask themselvs if they are really normal of just have ASD that is not diagnosed. I think the "Spectrum" should be made for only to ASD that is diagnosed or the DSM and ICD should use a different language and make sure that the symptoms of ASD are strict so too many people don't get diagnosed with ASD as I explained above. And or we make ASD even more broad as to include people who are well developed social skills, but have too much restricted interests or repetitive behaviors, as well sensory issues as well, but with social skills.
When I was in general ed classroom, I sometimes heard some students without a diagnosis of ASD getting confused and asking questions if they have ASD that is not diagnosed, because as I explained before, ASD goes from being very disabled to being in normal state of mind to the point were symptoms of ASD gets milder and milder that it is very hard to differentiate the very mild symptoms of ASD from NT traits and might not get diagnosed until you are much older or have ASD that was never diagnosed at all. That is what I worry about is that "Spectrum" is close to pie=3.14, close to infinity.
I think for NTs its easier to just tell them you have Aspergers. It saves a lot of complications and explanations if you say "I'm on the higher end of the autism spectrum" and additionally I have never liked the word "high" as it denotes some type of heirarchy.