Page 15 of 23 [ 364 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 23  Next

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Apr 2014, 4:45 pm

I do see your point.

I almost bought your screen name yesterday at a flower shop in Queens.

Please don't be deterred from posting--most threads aren't like this one. Perhaps the length of the thread has something to do with its nature.



Jaden
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,867

29 Apr 2014, 5:34 pm

dianthus wrote:
I don't know what all the fuss is about, but I really dislike seeing people gang up on one person on a forum. It's like watching a feeding frenzy.

I think everyone should have the opportunity to say what they want to say. But what is the need to keep berating other people for what they post, or how they express themselves, or how they live their lives or whatever? In the end most people don't really care who started it, or who said what. It just feels bad to see it happening.

It's no coincidence that threads like this usually end up focusing on one person. It starts out with a general complaint about the forum, which sets a precedent for judging other people for how they post. Then as the pages go on it tends to zero in one person, almost like they become the scapegoat for all the complaining.

I don't follow enough of what goes on here to know what is behind it all. And I don't want to know. I just know that seeing this kind of thing puts me off of wanting to participate here more. I hesitate to even click on threads because I wonder what kind of arguing will be going on.


I know exactly how you feel there, I'm pretty much the same way at this point, especially in regards to the PPR section. Just about every discussion there turns into a type-out frenzy full of insults that just barely pass the mods because of how they're worded. I haven't bothered looking in the PPR for about a month or more now, and before that, probably 3 months.
In fact, my overall experience here has made me not want to even post most of the time, simply because the kind of reaction I get is like that.


_________________
Writer. Author.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Apr 2014, 5:37 pm

That's why I like, sometimes, to inject a bit of levity into these discussions. People take themselves too seriously frequently. I've been known to do that myself. It's the Way of the Aspie.



Jaden
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,867

29 Apr 2014, 5:42 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
That's why I like, sometimes, to inject a bit of levity into these discussions. People take themselves too seriously frequently. I've been known to do that myself. It's the Way of the Aspie.


Levity is fine in a discussion, although I'm sure sometimes it can be misunderstood.

I can't speak for anyone else here on the forum, but personally, I have to take myself seriously because no-one else will, one of the many things that I imagine is pretty common among those with AS.


_________________
Writer. Author.


billiscool
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,989

29 Apr 2014, 5:48 pm

me and my lady friend are doing good now.
I leave this thread alone.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Apr 2014, 5:51 pm

I just can't be super-serious all the time. The quality of my life would then become dull. The one thing I hate is sanctimony.

I see what you're saying, though. Aspies are at a disadvantage in social situations--hence, they must present themselves as "serious" in order to be respected.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Apr 2014, 5:52 pm

Bill, I think you're all right. I'm glad you're getting along with your girl now.



littlebee
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,338

29 Apr 2014, 6:32 pm

dianthus wrote:
.....It's no coincidence that threads like this usually end up focusing on one person. It starts out with a general complaint about the forum, which sets a precedent for judging other people for how they post. Then as the pages go on it tends to zero in one person, almost like they become the scapegoat for all the complaining.

I don't follow enough of what goes on here to know what is behind it all. And I don't want to know. .... .

I do want to know, as social science is my passion and to understand the way community organizes or breaks down around ways of framing by selecting and/or discarding specific idea material and/or people is very interesting to me, and I think understanding how it works can help a lot of people communicate and connect better for the greater good and to help alleviate a lot of horrible suffering, so to me this all is very serious.
Part of a message I wrote on page 6 of this thread:
Quote:
The key point is that this common griping and fighting against a common enemy, such as nt's facilitates group organization at a certain primitive level in that some participants bond together to fight a common enemy, and this kind of comfort produces an actual hormonal effect which is extremely gratifying, especially to those who are not experiencing this good feeling in their ordinary lives and are hungering for it. (I have been criticized for the use of the word primitive in this context, so I want to make it clear that by primitive I am not saying the people are primitive, but what is meant is a rudimentary group organization that is not sophisticated I got the use of the words "primitive" and "sophisticated" in this context from a certain whacjo but not entirely whacko psycho analyst, Bion, who extensively studied and then wrote about group organization.)


http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp6025559.html#6025559

I would not say, however, that in this instance here, fighting that one guy even created a good feeling or a feeling of bonding. I see it as simply a very primitive group organization against facing the difficulties and hard Work of sorting out the complexities of such a topic, and some people just succumbed to an energy flow in the opposite direction due to laxity and lack of focus. The worst part for me was the low quality and lack of significant idea content in some of those messages to billiscool, and also the people doing it could see the topic was being deflected, as it was very obvious, and several people even mentioned it, but the people doing it didn't even care.

kraftiekorti. I do not recall ever participating with you before, but to me, though I'm sure your intent is good, the chat quality of your messages is diluting the possibility for any kind of real enquiry that will get to the heart of the very important subject matter of this thread. and in general, imo, once the force is leaked, then the tendency is for that same thing to continue, and I think that the way things have gone today is a good case in point, so I am going to leave this thread for now and go on to some new threads or back to some older ones until/if it gets back on track, which I suspect will not be soon. There are some messages here I wanted to reply to, one by Verdandi, one by Kors, and one by someone who commented on what I wrote about the yes-but game but now cannot. I do not want my messages mixed in with this kind of banter, but maybe someone else will get something out of it. Different strokes for different folks:-)

And personally I would rather be attacked on WP than to have the idea quality of the messages be diluted, though I know not everyone feels the same, so If anyone ever needs to attack anyone and absolutely cannot control himself, then please attack me, as I know how to turn the dialog back to whatever is the subject at hand....just make sure you put some kind of idea content into into the message that is real food for thought.



Last edited by littlebee on 29 Apr 2014, 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Jaden
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,867

29 Apr 2014, 6:34 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I just can't be super-serious all the time. The quality of my life would then become dull. The one thing I hate is sanctimony.

I see what you're saying, though. Aspies are at a disadvantage in social situations--hence, they must present themselves as "serious" in order to be respected.


I agree. Usually, in person I'm a pretty laid back guy. I make jokes, and relax and don't take anything seriously. Though online, I usually remain serious, particularly when in a serious discussion.

I think you're correct, respect plays a big role in that. Though respect is hard to come by anymore. :lol:


_________________
Writer. Author.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Apr 2014, 6:48 pm

We'll never get to the "heart of the manner" by merely splicing words and phrases together in a random manner, so that an academic-sounding paragraph will be produced. This is obfuscation to the highest degree, a barrier to true communication.

Do you think insulting someone gets to the "heart of the manner?" Perhaps I should have let non-sleeping dogs lie. Who do you think you're insulting?



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Apr 2014, 6:59 pm

Then again..... who cares?



wozeree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2013
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,344

29 Apr 2014, 7:06 pm

littlebee wrote:
dianthus wrote:
.....It's no coincidence that threads like this usually end up focusing on one person. It starts out with a general complaint about the forum, which sets a precedent for judging other people for how they post. Then as the pages go on it tends to zero in one person, almost like they become the scapegoat for all the complaining.

I don't follow enough of what goes on here to know what is behind it all. And I don't want to know. .... .

I do want to know, as social science is my passion and to understand the way community organizes or breaks down around ways of framing by selecting and/or discarding specific idea material and/or people is very interesting to me, and I think understanding how it works can help a lot of people communicate and connect better for the greater good and to help alleviate a lot of horrible suffering, so to me this all is very serious.
Part of a message I wrote on page 6 of this thread:
Quote:
The key point is that this common griping and fighting against a common enemy, such as nt's facilitates group organization at a certain primitive level in that some participants bond together to fight a common enemy, and this kind of comfort produces an actual hormonal effect which is extremely gratifying, especially to those who are not experiencing this good feeling in their ordinary lives and are hungering for it. (I have been criticized for the use of the word primitive in this context, so I want to make it clear that by primitive I am not saying the people are primitive, but what is meant is a rudimentary group organization that is not sophisticated I got the use of the words "primitive" and "sophisticated" in this context from a certain whacjo but not entirely whacko psycho analyst, Bion, who extensively studied and then wrote about group organization.)


http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp6025559.html#6025559

I would not say, however, that in this instance here, fighting that one guy even created a good feeling or a feeling of bonding. I see it as simply a very primitive group organization against facing the difficulties and hard Work of sorting out the complexities of such a topic, and some people just succumbed to an energy flow in the opposite direction due to laxity and lack of focus. The worst part for me was the low quality and lack of significant idea content in some of those messages to billiscool, and also the people doing it could see the topic was being deflected, as it was very obvious, and several people even mentioned it, but the people doing it didn't even care.

kraftiekorti. I do not recall ever participating with you before, but to me, though I'm sure your intent is good, the chat quality of your messages is diluting the possibility for any kind of real enquiry that will get to the heart of the very important subject matter of this thread. and in general, imo, once the force is leaked, then the tendency is for that same thing to continue, and I think that the way things have gone today is a good case in point, so I am going to leave this thread for now and go on to some new threads or back to some older ones until/if it gets back on track, which I suspect will not be soon. There are some messages here I wanted to reply to, one by Verdandi, one by Kors, and one by someone who commented on what I wrote about the yes-but game but now cannot. I do not want my messages mixed in with this kind of banter, but maybe someone else will get something out of it. Different strokes for different folks:-)

And personally I would rather be attacked on WP than to have the idea quality of the messages be diluted, though I know not everyone feels the same, so If anyone ever needs to attack anyone and absolutely cannot control himself, then please attack me, as I know how to turn the dialog back to whatever is the subject at hand....just make sure you put some kind of idea content into into the message that is real food for thought.


littlebee if you couldn't be hateful, you'd melt into a puddle of mud. It seems to be the only think keeping you going.



littlebee
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,338

29 Apr 2014, 7:08 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
We'll never get to the "heart of the manner" by merely splicing words and phrases together in a random manner, so that an academic-sounding paragraph will be produced. This is obfuscation to the highest degree, a barrier to true communication.

Do you think insulting someone gets to the "heart of the manner?" Perhaps I should have let non-sleeping dogs lie. Who do you think you're insulting?


If you feel like I am insulting you, not intended, or maybe you are implying I am insulting the people who were insulting billiscool because of thinking/feeling he is insulting them or whatever. Imo reacting to vaguely perceived insults or even out and out insults is counter productive. We are just on two different tapes of communication style. Carry on.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Apr 2014, 7:17 pm

You stated that my method of "chat" was somehow substandard, that it was "below" the discourse necessary for a productive thread.

Honestly, if someone would state that your level of discourse is inadequate, wouldn't you be insulted?

Be honest with yourself: How would you like it if I told you to "carry on?"

Let's just move on. Shake hands. It's a draw. Perhaps I'm overly sensitive. Perhaps I should take a course on splicing paragraphs.

This argument is not productive. It's my fault for continuing it. I don't know you, and you don't know me. We're just online spectres.

Have a nice day. We live to see another day. Perhaps, at another time, we'll be compatriots.



littlebee
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,338

29 Apr 2014, 7:21 pm

wozeree wrote:
littlebee wrote:
dianthus wrote:
.....It's no coincidence that threads like this usually end up focusing on one person. It starts out with a general complaint about the forum, which sets a precedent for judging other people for how they post. Then as the pages go on it tends to zero in one person, almost like they become the scapegoat for all the complaining.

I don't follow enough of what goes on here to know what is behind it all. And I don't want to know. .... .

I do want to know, as social science is my passion and to understand the way community organizes or breaks down around ways of framing by selecting and/or discarding specific idea material and/or people is very interesting to me, and I think understanding how it works can help a lot of people communicate and connect better for the greater good and to help alleviate a lot of horrible suffering, so to me this all is very serious.
Part of a message I wrote on page 6 of this thread:
Quote:
The key point is that this common griping and fighting against a common enemy, such as nt's facilitates group organization at a certain primitive level in that some participants bond together to fight a common enemy, and this kind of comfort produces an actual hormonal effect which is extremely gratifying, especially to those who are not experiencing this good feeling in their ordinary lives and are hungering for it. (I have been criticized for the use of the word primitive in this context, so I want to make it clear that by primitive I am not saying the people are primitive, but what is meant is a rudimentary group organization that is not sophisticated I got the use of the words "primitive" and "sophisticated" in this context from a certain whacjo but not entirely whacko psycho analyst, Bion, who extensively studied and then wrote about group organization.)


http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp6025559.html#6025559

I would not say, however, that in this instance here, fighting that one guy even created a good feeling or a feeling of bonding. I see it as simply a very primitive group organization against facing the difficulties and hard Work of sorting out the complexities of such a topic, and some people just succumbed to an energy flow in the opposite direction due to laxity and lack of focus. The worst part for me was the low quality and lack of significant idea content in some of those messages to billiscool, and also the people doing it could see the topic was being deflected, as it was very obvious, and several people even mentioned it, but the people doing it didn't even care.

kraftiekorti. I do not recall ever participating with you before, but to me, though I'm sure your intent is good, the chat quality of your messages is diluting the possibility for any kind of real enquiry that will get to the heart of the very important subject matter of this thread. and in general, imo, once the force is leaked, then the tendency is for that same thing to continue, and I think that the way things have gone today is a good case in point, so I am going to leave this thread for now and go on to some new threads or back to some older ones until/if it gets back on track, which I suspect will not be soon. There are some messages here I wanted to reply to, one by Verdandi, one by Kors, and one by someone who commented on what I wrote about the yes-but game but now cannot. I do not want my messages mixed in with this kind of banter, but maybe someone else will get something out of it. Different strokes for different folks:-)

And personally I would rather be attacked on WP than to have the idea quality of the messages be diluted, though I know not everyone feels the same, so If anyone ever needs to attack anyone and absolutely cannot control himself, then please attack me, as I know how to turn the dialog back to whatever is the subject at hand....just make sure you put some kind of idea content into into the message that is real food for thought.


littlebee if you couldn't be hateful, you'd melt into a puddle of mud. It seems to be the only think keeping you going.


Actually the last two days some Charlie Parker interspersed with Etta Jones and Etta James and several episodes of Ray Donovan and an very occasional tiny nip of Calvados is keeping me going....:-) ..plus a lot of love, drinking the water of deep enquiry and sheer inspiration....what is keeping you going?



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

29 Apr 2014, 7:40 pm

The thought of listening to a guitarist play raw blues circa 1915, amid the crickets. No fire, because it's too hot. I've just repaired my cabin so that they'll be no leaks when the inevitable thunderstorm arrives.

I feed my family well, and deserve to listen to the Sublime (i.e., the blues) amid the blazing stars, fireflies, and occasional shooting stars which draw parabolic patterns--as if they're trying to create a new constellation.