Beyond The Boxes of Metaphoria
Intelectual Conversation Invited:
Beyond The Boxes
of Metaphoria©
Principles of The Origination \ Originator Complex
(X) - Universal Point of Singularity as a Psychological Complex & False Fact
"Something cannot become from nothing and that something that came
from nothing couldn't have created the everything of what is or was originally."
(Y) - Complex of the Psyche and Possibilities
"An illusion is only as believable as its associated delusions"
(Z) - Originator Complex
"The universe never began, it was always.
The rest is in your head."
Mind
Box
Time: Beyond The Infinity Complex & Universal Origination
Time & Self-Relativity (Observance & Cognition) and
Time Relativity & Universal Origination.
If something was always it could not have been nothing originally, as anything that is always is product of another point of origination from the other. Therefore neither something nor everything was product of the mechanism of any singular point of origination universally. Hence time a concept of mind and origination indicative of the laws of observance and cognitions. The Universe however always changing had no origination of itself, it is, was and cannot be product of itself originally, since origination is beginnings. Time is the mere measures of consciousness and its renditions.
There are two origination complexes, that of the self
or individual councienciation and that of the universe regardless
of its current universal laws.
Abstract: The Circle is No Absolute
Nathan
Why do people not understand, it is simple logic. I do not intend insult of any kind but on this planet only a few exist that could remark I think.
Calling all smart people, smart people hello.. Where are the smart people?
Oh yeah they sent them all to Iraq because the dumb ones are in office. The dumb folks are trying to kill off all the smart people!
Perhaps you have driven away all the people from your own private website and this is the only place left you are not banned from, Nathan. Stop insulting people because they are too smart to respond to you. I know your Modus Operandi and apparently others here do too.
_________________
Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods. - Albert Einstein
Last edited by Aspen on 04 Feb 2006, 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
What!
People have decided to not like me? I do not really care because I have only been banned by two places, those were the first in my life time.Also that is for complicated reasons in which both admins did not like me at all, I do not kiss up typically but if like in the past some administrators require pets (to kiss up) then I will not do that. I am attempting to challenge persons, if your mind cannot handle intellectual conversation without a psychical breakdown of insult because of my unique way of thinking then refrain.
For the longest of times I have been corrected while speaking freely, yet the jealousies, inequalities and frank intolerance of others is the limitation.
I am a new member here on the forum, I have not typed on this forum before because of the likelyhood of persons like yourself. I have grown tired of them inciting conflict, all being cold hearted for the most part.
You however are the second person in two days to do this, while I am not your mind to know why you’re saying these things and using criminology terminology to instill a fear of your frank delusions of me. I must admit to some humor in light of your current circumstance and anyone else that might proceed in this bullying.
Can you respond with some intelligence please, not your delusions of me due to your hate as a hater? Come on.. People should stop following me around from board to board and let me conversate in peace.
It is an intellectual challenge, Mr. / Ms. Dairy air.
I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man.
You were banned from two fora because you would not stop making personal attacks when requested to do so. On both of them you repeatedly called people who disagreed with your opinions Nazis. You were warned and then you started personally attacking the administrators!
I am glad you are here and I hope you can behave yourself this time, but if you are already insulting people because they chose not to answer your first post, I am concerned.
_________________
Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods. - Albert Einstein
Last edited by Aspen on 04 Feb 2006, 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
No way... That is not the truth bucko..
Also your interrupting my post bringing up issues you do not have the facts about. Where are your facts as they were? Where are your facts as a first hand witness to all that occurred? You don't have them but I would take a lie detector test.
The WWII comparison I made during a time when historical comparisons were being made. It was not a direct inclination rather a comparison, no one talked to me about the post instead no explanation was given and I was banned. The truth was not given as there were other circumstances in which I was told I was lying.
When a few or more are of an agenda, the truth does not matter when the truth hurts.
Hypercondriaism is a disease, not me!
I think it is only proper to have patients with me, if your interpretations differs from my truth and intent and I’m punished for it then I’m not the one with a problem. Persons simply hate me because I do not fit in or think like others, but that nonsense is ending now with the truth!
Talking to myself, as even universities have not the mind to comprehend. At least I suspect.
(X) - Universal Point of Singularity as a Psychological Complex & False Fact
"Something cannot become from nothing and that something that came
from nothing couldn't have created the everything of what is or was originally."
There are two reasonings to current theory madness in science. That at a point of singularity the universe began or that a creator intelligence created all things. Both are highly illogical and are based upon the non-realization of the minds inherent laws of self, the psychological conditioning based upon societal logics of life and the passing of awareness. The duality of self is the intra and extra dynamics between the external and internal spheres of conscious placements.
Time is relative to itself, yet the dynamics of time beyond static (what is, is and is pure logic measures) and that of the psyche, which paradigms itself to the relativity of conscious state. The feeling of the passing of time is subconsciously ingrained by logic measure but the awareness states in reflection propgate the feeling and or emotional measure.
But for the external universe in what it is, instead of the inner-projection of it. It is fair to say that the universe itself is not in anyway insain!
Now that this is realized it is easy to step out of societal conditioning and observe oneself without the confines of human logics of time measures, as it was mind invented.
It yet is logical to say without risky assumptions of other theory of illogical natures and from common sense, that the universe itself was always, just not the mind nor human pathologies. The universe cannot begin itself, it is of mind and its inner self universe, per say.
Last edited by sc on 02 Feb 2006, 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yeah that is what people do, they team up and start putting down a person. I'll keep standing up for myself this time no need for others to get involved.
When at school I dealt with them all the time. Unfortunately for them they learned to know better. Not in a violent way, it’s just that a mind such as mine is nothing like others. I do not know if you have autism or not. But I think perhaps you should partake in the conversation not demean me in anyway further. The comical event is on you yourself, if I do not think like others and I am excluded form things for that, it is discrimination. That is why I ask if you have an A.S.D.
The emotionality of belief, despite the lack of subjectivity it is still interesting. For instance sociology would prove religion helps people, such as churches. It is yet still in there minds, as is my thought. So is also what is projected from it and instilled into other minds.
The conflict originates in psychology as even I study it itself, not as it is but how it believes, within the interpretation that delusion is of the belief of external hidden intelligences that are of supernatural existences. Yet it is clearly an archetype and the primary archetypes are societal conditioned based upon central themes of beliefs and the belief versions projected belief type.
Then my question is how belief influence science and human logics in general directly or indirectly. Origins are of the logics of mind, not the external as it cannot be product of itself originally.
Also belief can be a relaxing thing, a psychological manifestation of complex to cope and deal with the reality of conclusion, the end. It is interesting to observe the human condition in totality, it is simple then that of the complex of delusion found in the typical.
Belief, symbology as archetypes and conscious thought forms relating to concepts and or ideas in a shared way as a type of archetypical association.
I've had autism my whole life, I've been called crazy by people before because of being in classes and my unique way of thought. Thus far no one has intellectualized here on the forum. When others are not trying to put me down just chat to me. It seems this forum is filled full of people who have a popularity presents and must put down others to feel good about themselves.
Is this high school or elementary school aged folks here, the social maturity. I'm going to the university next week. There are smart girls there.
Girly men are the people that make themselves be seen as pathetic folks who cannot carry a conversation without grouping up and attacking the one individual that is new. IF you want your social click to remain as it is with your social acts, then I say my influence upon this forum would reflect social equalities and not the pricks.
Who's your daddy, who let the dogs out, who who who. (humor)
Pardon my existence while I figure a few more posts.
You make what is different insane, when in fact what is normal is the imbalance of this world, as so clearly seen on the news and the orders of causalities and their idiocies.
1. Why are you asking in a poll, if I understand or not? Now that I have read you, and understand you, what do you want?
People do not typically understand what I am trying to say. As this is a problem I have worked on for some time, it is important to know if how I explain it makes sense. I am impatient to find conversation about it, without relating and dissecting ideas intellectually they are not valid to me, just ideas that are annoying to express due to the complexities and limitations of words. Comparative reasoning cannot incite the correct frameworks but build upon a presentation simply.
It is the difference between thinking in word and visually, words are limiting things because I always have to come up with new ones to explain ideas. Somewhere there need to be invented a direct connect between minds as to avoid the social complexity nonsense, I need a USB cord to my brain but it requires a converter and an adapter. Nothing I’ve seen on ebay seems to be fitting these descriptions <Laugh Snort>.
If 3 people can understand me then that is suitable enough to expand, even for simplicity reasons. Seeming I’ve already spoken the brilliance I suppose there is no intellectual input from others deemed necessary?
2. Why is this in the General Forum?
I do not know, as it is topic that actually encompasses science, religion, philosophy and general idea not otherwise specified.
I do not know this forum yet.
[/b]