Implementing visual learning resources into universities
I started a thread a while ago about the way universities are all geared towards auditory word based learning and how this makes things harder for visual learners and someone suggested I get in touch with some autism advocacy organisation about this. I'm gonna do that but what exactly should I suggest they do about this? Would there actually be a chance they can get the universities to alter their approach to teaching in order to make it so visual learners can learn well in university environments too?
Also my psychiatrist tells me that people on the spectrum are entitled to special treatment in university. Any of you know anything about this? I didn't think much of it because I didn't think I needed it but I probably should take it because I am at a disadvantage being a pure visual thinker but this advantage is a purely academic one as my style of thinking gives me an advantage when it comes to thinking scientific concepts. Its learning which is a problem because we seem to be living in a world of word thinkers. For example right now I'm learning about stereochemistry, concepts which are by their very nature visual ones yet the only tutorials I can find consist of almost nothing but words, for example
http://research.cm.utexas.edu/nbauld/teach/stereo.html
it makes me kinda sick this words are so monotonous and abstract they actually make me feel sick when I have to deal with large piles of them. Why can't they just throw pictures in it would speed up learning a thousand fold for people with similar thinking styles to me.
About the special treatment, you can get a summaries in written form or digital so that you wont have to attend lectures / can read trough the content after a lecture (aimed at those who struggle with auditive seq. learning or sensory issues). Also extended time at tests, help with practical issues. As for your learning style, being a visual learner is indeed a disadvantage in class. You're best of talking to your professors, they can probably provide you with books/tasks/applications aimed at visual learning. I'm sorry that I can't answer all the questions, but I hope that my response was atleast somewhat helpfull.
My god I had no idea that kinda special treatment was available. That would be perfect for me as I often find going to lectures is a waste of time for me since I don't learn well by listening.
I don't want to give you false expectations as i'm not from the US - but I can translate the paper I got about special treatment if you want me to.
SeaMonkey,
If you do a little research into teaching you'll find that good teachers should use a variety of methods to teach each concept. At university level professors are often experts in their fields but have little training in teaching methods. In my favorite learning style model there are 9 Intelligences (thinking styles, areas of ability) that are recognized. Most people are competent in more than one and some may have unusual abilities in one or more style. The most common style is Visual. Any teacher who seeks excellence as a teacher, not just an expert in their field, should be adept at using visual teaching methods. Many university professors simply don't have enough background in Cognitive Development or Teaching Theory to know this and are far less effective than they could be in the classroom.
Great teachers are aware of their students learning styles and are able to employ many methods to teach all concepts even if it isn't one of their personal learning styles. They routinely teach the same lesson in multiple styles and when a student comes to them confused about a lesson are able to identify that students strengths as a learner and adapt their lessons to the students abilities and will then incorporate that teaching style into their lessons while that student is present (and possibly always if it's a common style).
Great students are aware of their strengths and know that their teacher can not always teach in their learning style effectively. They learn to find reasources to learn the material in their own style when the teacher fails to do so in the lesson. For instance a kinetic (Kinestetic) learning style isn't easily adapted to many college classrooms, unless maybe if it's a lab. When studying a kinetic learner will create their own manipulative objects that help them understand the lesson or perform physical tasks that help them study. In Astronomy I would close my eyes and point to imaginary objects in the sky to memorize their location or make shapes with my arms to remember the relative sizes and qualities of objects we were studying. Great students know their teachers can't be everything to everybody and help fill the gap to make the most of their educational opportunities.
Universities are required to make accomodations for disabilities. If you are unable to write effectively you can bring a word processer to take notes with even if they aren't allowed at your school, or if you have a cognitive processing speed issue you can get extra time for exams. Wheelchair ramps and adaptable classrooms are also required.
A requirement for teachers to use visual teaching methods would benefit most of the student population at any given school because most people don't learn their best from pure verbal methods, or any single method. Since visual learning is the most common it would be the best choice for a single teaching style, but would leave people like me who aren't good at visual learning out in the cold (which I know isn't your intention). Perhaps what's needed is required teachers training that includes information about learning styles and how to teach to them. I think it's also something worth bringing up with individual teachers, in a respectful way. If you aren't doing well in a class and explain that you are a visual thinker/learner and really need visual aids to grasp the concepts they should accomodate. If they don't I think you should have grounds for pursueing the establishement of a policy.
I do well in college but thats most likely only because I invest 10 times the amount of time into it as most of the other students. I've devoted my whole life to science and I study it for the fun. You say the majority learns with pictures but I've been questioning people on the internet about how they think and it seems the majority of people actually have an internal dialogue (they talk in their heads all the time) and many people don't even believe its possible to think without words so I'm well aware that my purely visual thinking style isn't too common but there are definitely more people that think in unusual ways. I can learn by memorizing words but to me that doesn't feel like learning at all that just seems like memorizing sequences of words so I can later parrot them off to give the impression that I understand the concepts. I suppose I can get in touch with the lecturers but I'm thinking from next year on I'll just go to the odd lecturer to see where the rest of the class is at but I'll do the learning at home using the internet. The benefit of my learning style is I get a way deeper and more accurate understanding than anyone could by learning just the lecture material alone because when I'm in front of the computer I simultaneously read 5-10 different sources at once to be sure I'm forming an accurate mental image.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Faint Visual Noise
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
27 Apr 2025, 9:36 pm |
Learning about autism from those who live on the spectrum |
05 Jun 2025, 6:52 pm |