TPE2 wrote:
It is not because marriage and sons that women usually (in some range of education) have jobs like waitress or checkout girl, and men (in the same range) jobs like construction worker or fisherman (better payed jobs); it is because a combination of stereotypes and a different physical strength.
However, the statistics that say that women earn 70 cents on the dollar when compared to men are comparing men and women in the same field with the same education and the same number of years of work experience. The statistics the previous poster was citing are not comparing waitresses to fishermen but rather female restaurant servers to male, female fishers to male, female office workers to male, female professors to male, etc. With age, education, and years in the market factored so the comparison is "apples to apples" not the "apples to kumquats" you are describing.
Quote:
Even in withe-collar, middle class jobs, unmarried, un-childiss women are at disadvantage, because potential employers think "sooner or later, this girl will marry, have sons and will have many absences of work because that" and will prefer to give the job to a man, creating a situation where men will have the better jobs.
Actually, the studies I have read for research for my classes indicate that never-married, nulliparous (never had children) women are paid higher than men when age, education, and years in the work force are factored in.
_________________
"In the end, we decide if we're remembered for what happened to us or for what we did with it."
-- Randy K. Milholland
Avatar=WWI propaganda poster promoting victory gardens.