Right and wrong are subjective value judgments. Rarely is ANYONE fully right or fully wrong in any given situation (criminal behavior excluded, of course). I will definitely adjust my thinking when confronted with contradictory information if I can conclude that information has greater validity than what I am using.
Where I run into problems is that NTs seem to think being right or wrong is important, so if you make a 'mistake', you need to feel some sort of remorse. Most often, in my mind, there is no mistake on some moral level, only bad conclusions based on faulty information. I often feel no remorse for mistaken thinking or actions because I refuse to accept there is something wrong with ME that caused the mistake when in fact it was just insufficient or wrongly interpreted information. Because I am so matter of fact about mistakes, and I don't show the "correct" level of remorse or humility, I am seen as arrogant. This is NOT true because I hold all people to the same standards as I hold for myself. A mistake is a simply mistake, not necessarily a character flaw. I also run into problems because people hate having mistakes pointed out because they often personalize them. Even little things "like the pie crust is too dark" is taken as a personal attack rather than an objective evaluation to "what did you think of my pie?". The correct answer is "It tasted really good" but the question wasn't "How did my pie taste?".
This is NOT the same as apologizing to someone for doing or saying something that might have been hurtful to them. In the case of the pie, if I happen to figure out that "the crust is too dark" was a bad answer, then I'm inclined to say something that would attempt to ease the bad feelings created by my literal interpretation of the question "What did you think of my pie?"