wavefreak58 wrote:
If a person can identify a particular emotional state by saying "I feel <insert emotion>" they are either describing a state that is primarily singular or inaccurately describing a more complex state. Since for the most part NTs seem to effectively communicate emotional states then I have to assume that for the most part that states being described as singular are relatively accurate. Further, an NT will describe a state of mixed emotions as precisely that - mixed emotions. Whereas for the most part autistics (well for me at least), there is little experiencing of emotions clearly enough to allow labeling as any particular state.
Not experiencing emotions clearly enough to label and communicate them effectively is NOT the same has feeling them intensely. I feel very intensely at times.
I feel very intensely at times too and I'm sure the vast majority are able to - assuming they're lacking the psychological traumas or genetical anomalies needed to be incapable. But do I inherit the ability to properly express my emotions? Not in a way that everybody else can relate to. Most often due to the fact that any communication produces
illusions of understanding each other. You don't exactly
copy thought one hundred percent.
So, as an example, if I say to you that I always experience extra ordinary strong feelings of anger, I have already compared it to what's ordinary. But how can I do that if I have never experienced ordinary anger? You see, applying any adjectives to expressions of emotions is at some level just displaying a combination of egocentrism and ignorance.
_________________
When superficiality reigns your reality, you are already lost in the sea of normality.