Page 1 of 2 [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Loborojo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Age: 66
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,242
Location: Negombo

03 Sep 2008, 5:53 pm

who started calling NTs NTs??? We Aspes did?


_________________
Your Aspie score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 48 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


JakeWilson
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 132

03 Sep 2008, 6:04 pm

yeah, "NT" is an Aspie term.



agmoie
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2005
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 333
Location: Britain

03 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm

Who started calling Aspies ret*ds etc,
NTs did...



-JR
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 650
Location: Somewhere in Time

03 Sep 2008, 6:38 pm

"NT" is a medical term, no? "Neurologically Typical"...?


_________________
Still grateful.
"...do you really think you're in control...?"
Diagnosis: uncertain.


Warsie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,542
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

03 Sep 2008, 7:48 pm

agmoie wrote:
Who started calling Aspies ret*ds etc,
NTs did...


QFT...


_________________
I am a Star Wars Fan, Warsie here.
Masterdebating on chi-city's south side.......!


Loborojo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Age: 66
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,242
Location: Negombo

03 Sep 2008, 7:54 pm

Warsie wrote:
agmoie wrote:
Who started calling Aspies ret*ds etc,
NTs did...


QFT...


yes Warsie and that means???


_________________
Your Aspie score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 48 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


-JR
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 650
Location: Somewhere in Time

03 Sep 2008, 8:03 pm

Quoted For Truth.


_________________
Still grateful.
"...do you really think you're in control...?"
Diagnosis: uncertain.


Loborojo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Age: 66
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,242
Location: Negombo

03 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm

-JR wrote:
Quoted For Truth.


thanks JR


_________________
Your Aspie score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 48 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


Last edited by Loborojo on 03 Sep 2008, 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

lionesss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,305
Location: not anywhere near you

03 Sep 2008, 8:06 pm

but really is anyone TRULY "neuro-typcail"?


_________________
Come chat about the mystical side and everyday part of life on http://esotericden.proboards.com -The Esoteric Den!! !


Kajjie
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 495
Location: Sometimes London, sometimes Coventry

04 Sep 2008, 7:24 am

lionesss wrote:
but really is anyone TRULY "neuro-typcail"?


Thank you!

I don't like the term 'NT' or 'neurotypical' for many reasons. The first is inaccuracy. A person who does not have an ASD is not necessarily neurotypical. They make have cerbal palsy or schizophrenia or brain damage and then they would not be 'NT' because their brains are different from the normal, but are still not on the autistic spectrum.

Also, 'neurotypical' sounds kind of insulting (my mum said this). 'Typical' is often a word used sorta sarcastically to describe things that are common, but rubbish. I'd prefer we just called them non-autistic, non-ASD or just 'normal' people but people tend to take the second one badly.



Kajjie
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 495
Location: Sometimes London, sometimes Coventry

04 Sep 2008, 7:26 am

agmoie wrote:
Who started calling Aspies ret*ds etc,
NTs did...


That doesn't mean we should call them 'NT's. :| Also, many 'normal' people would not call an Aspie (or anyone) a ret*d, it's just a few of them that are mean.



Jenk
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 281

04 Sep 2008, 7:35 am

Propose a superior term, as writing "everyone else" could get tiring. Neurologically standard.



Kajjie
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 495
Location: Sometimes London, sometimes Coventry

04 Sep 2008, 7:37 am

Jenk wrote:
Propose a superior term, as writing "everyone else" could get tiring.


I think we should call them NOAS: Not On the Autistic Spectrum.



aintnowreck
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 112
Location: Somewhere on the shortwave band

04 Sep 2008, 7:48 am

agmoie wrote:
Who started calling Aspies ret*ds etc,
NTs did...


I second that.

Nice.


_________________
There's nothing like pirate radio on shortwave. Long live free radio!

Music saved my life, musicians ruined it.


Sora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,906
Location: Europe

04 Sep 2008, 10:07 am

-JR wrote:
"NT" is a medical term, no? "Neurologically Typical"...?


No.

Neurologically typical is non-existent in the medical language because really, who'd be 'NT' in reality?

Nobody would be.

Kajjie wrote:
Jenk wrote:
Propose a superior term, as writing "everyone else" could get tiring.


I think we should call them NOAS: Not On the Autistic Spectrum.


Or people would just write non-autistic. NA

At least it has in A as in ASD or AS and AD which somehow connects the word NA to autism.

It would also probably finally be used accurately.

Non-autistic people is something different from the mysterious non-existent 'NT'.


_________________
Autism + ADHD
______
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett


Loborojo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Age: 66
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,242
Location: Negombo

04 Sep 2008, 10:14 am

Sora wrote:
-JR wrote:
"NT" is a medical term, no? "Neurologically Typical"...?


No.

Neurologically typical is non-existent in the medical language because really, who'd be 'NT' in reality?

Nobody would be.

Kajjie wrote:
Jenk wrote:
Propose a superior term, as writing "everyone else" could get tiring.


I think we should call them NOAS: Not On the Autistic Spectrum.


Or people would just write non-autistic. NA

At least it has in A as in ASD or AS and AD which somehow connects the word NA to autism.

It would also probably finally be used accurately.

Non-autistic people is something different from the mysterious non-existent 'NT'.


NA would still include schizofrenic, cerbral palsy, imbeciles, bipolar which are also not 'normal'


_________________
Your Aspie score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 48 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie