Is Aspergers a disorder or is it simply a difference

Page 3 of 4 [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

KnarlyDUDE09
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Age: 28
Gender: Female
Posts: 685
Location: Manchester, UK

15 Dec 2012, 12:25 pm

I believe by definition it is a disorder, however it is also a difference.


_________________
Aspie score: 160 of 200, neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 44 of 200
(01/11/2012)

YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNjuB4 ... WnSA552Xjg


androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

15 Dec 2012, 12:40 pm

From a neurotypical perspective autism would be a disorder because neurotypicals follow instructions using common sense rather than logic.



SoftKitty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 581
Location: Prague, Czech republic

17 Dec 2012, 1:28 pm

Jitro wrote:
Is Aspergers a disorder or is it simply a difference like being left-handed or gay?


Depends how youtake it, but I´d say ´s a difference (in processing informations), rather than a disorder.


_________________
-"Do you expect me to talk?"
-"No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die!"


Vectorspace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 903
Location: Germany

22 Dec 2012, 3:46 am

Jitro wrote:
Is left-handedness a disorder or being gay? Those were thought to be disorders at one point in time.

What kind of disorder would that be?

Being gay means that you cannot love the opposite sex – but you have no desire to do so.
Being left-handed means that you cannot write with your right hand (and a couple of other things) – which is no problem if you can write with your left hand.

Having Asperger's often means that you have significant troubles coping with social situations and other basic things in life. And this is not (only) due to discrimination, but because you lack skills like reading body language and understanding and showing emotions. Some people can compensate for that with their intelligence, but it's still not equivalent.

Thus, Asperger's is a disorder, while being gay or left-handed is not.



omegatyrant
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 50

22 Dec 2012, 7:51 am

Who decides what is "equivalent?" Are you implying that reading body language and showing emotions is more important than raw intellect? Some people might respectfully disagree...



omegatyrant
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 50

22 Dec 2012, 8:04 am

answeraspergers wrote:
In my experience difference causes dissonance and dissonance causes negative emotion for NT people. This is sufficient justification for all manner of bullying, discrimination, exclusion etc and it that which is disabling. If the world was populated with Aspies, there would be no problem to function logically and analytically rather than oh so emotionally.


This. 1000 times this.



Vectorspace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 903
Location: Germany

23 Dec 2012, 7:32 pm

omegatyrant wrote:
Who decides what is "equivalent?" Are you implying that reading body language and showing emotions is more important than raw intellect? Some people might respectfully disagree...

Asperger's doesn't imply high intelligence, and there are intelligent people who are good at socializing.



Foxxtale
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 293

23 Dec 2012, 7:44 pm

Definition of DISORDER
1: to disturb the order of
2: to disturb the regular or normal functions of

now all you need to do is define "normal"...
As far as I am concerned, I am normal. It is the Neurotypical community that are weird to me. I don't understand them at all. So by my definition, it is the neurotypical community that is disturbing my normal function. They are the disorder ;)

OK, so that might be taking it a bit far, but you get my point... who is to decide what is normal? By my definition of "normal", I am perfectly fine. I have never known anything different, and despite the fact that I might have some issues getting along with the "normal" crowd, by my definition, all I am is different than they are. If anyone is disturbing my regular function, by definition, it is they that are disordered.


_________________
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
-Dr. Seuss


answeraspergers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 811
Location: uk

23 Dec 2012, 7:58 pm

Aspergers does relate to high intellect but no that is not a sufficient condition for it.

Most studies of AS people average around 122 IQ which is higher than average in any country.

The way I see it, I'm waiting for NT's to catch up and I want an apology when they do. lol :D



lady_katie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 575

23 Dec 2012, 8:02 pm

I think that this is a technicality that depends on the individual with AS. For some it's a disorder, for others it's a difference, and for some it's a little bit of both. The wide variety of answers seems to confirm this, in my opinion.



Vectorspace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 903
Location: Germany

24 Dec 2012, 2:41 am

There are also deaf people who claim that hearing is a disorder – I think they are wrong.

I'm not sure if I would sacrifice any intelligence for gaining social skills; but if they were offered to me for free, I wouldn't hesitate to take them.
I think "NT communication behavior" is something useful, and there is a reason why evolution has created it.



omegatyrant
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 50

24 Dec 2012, 9:54 am

Vectorspace wrote:
omegatyrant wrote:
Who decides what is "equivalent?" Are you implying that reading body language and showing emotions is more important than raw intellect? Some people might respectfully disagree...

Asperger's doesn't imply high intelligence, and there are intelligent people who are good at socializing.


This is not what I said or meant. Of course not all Aspies are highly intelligent, but that was not my point. I was trying to ask you what you thought was most important based on the information you gave in your previous post. Please go back and read my previous post again, and try not to put words in my mouth.

You also completely ignored my question on who or what defines "equivalent."



omegatyrant
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 50

24 Dec 2012, 10:14 am

Vectorspace wrote:
There are also deaf people who claim that hearing is a disorder – I think they are wrong.

I'm not sure if I would sacrifice any intelligence for gaining social skills; but if they were offered to me for free, I wouldn't hesitate to take them.
I think "NT communication behavior" is something useful, and there is a reason why evolution has created it.


Who has ever said that hearing is a disorder? Source for this? I'm sorry, but it seems like you are trying to grasp on to any straw you possibly can here.

Interesting, your views on evolution. Do you also feel that there is a "reason" why evolution "created" the Autistic mind? If we are so "flawed," why hasn't natural selection eliminated us yet? Why are autistics increasing in number? How is it that two otherwise NT people, with no Autistic genes going back generations, can still produce autistic children?



answeraspergers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 811
Location: uk

24 Dec 2012, 2:01 pm

Aspie is the next step and he knows it :D

If you think about it emotional functioning was favored by evolution at a much simpler time. Today the issues are complex and require much more analysis that what people feel about something.

Thats the way I look at it :D



omegatyrant
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 50

25 Dec 2012, 7:26 pm

answeraspergers wrote:
Aspie is the next step and he knows it :D

If you think about it emotional functioning was favored by evolution at a much simpler time. Today the issues are complex and require much more analysis that what people feel about something.

Thats the way I look at it :D


I don't know if it is "the next step," because I do not think that evolution has a goal in mind. It's just a process of beings trying to adapt as best they can to a given environment. However, I do agree with you that society has changed a great deal since the hunter-gatherer days. So much has happened to human life, just in the past 100 years alone. The biggest problem seems to be that our biology simply has not been able to evolve and keep up with the tremendous social and cultural revolutions that have completely changed how we live. Darwinian evolution is simply too slow!



Vectorspace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 903
Location: Germany

25 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm

omegatyrant wrote:
Vectorspace wrote:
omegatyrant wrote:
Who decides what is "equivalent?" Are you implying that reading body language and showing emotions is more important than raw intellect? Some people might respectfully disagree...

Asperger's doesn't imply high intelligence, and there are intelligent people who are good at socializing.


This is not what I said or meant. Of course not all Aspies are highly intelligent, but that was not my point. I was trying to ask you what you thought was most important based on the information you gave in your previous post.

Personally, I think they are equally important.
But if we take the current definition(s) of Asperger's Syndrome, it's characterized as the lack of certain social skills (and a couple of other things), not by high intelligence.

If we found a gene that triggers Asperger's Syndrome and increases intelligence at the same time, one might argue if having that gene is a disorder. But in all diagnosis criteria that I know about, Asperger's Syndrome is considered a disorder by the wording of the definition itself.

I'm not sure if arguing about this is worthwhile, because it seems like we are talking about different things.

Quote:
You also completely ignored my question on who or what defines "equivalent."

The current practice (I know that at least Attwood handles it that way) is: If you have autistic traits but they don't have any negative impact on your life, you don't get the "Asperger's" diagnosis. So it's basically up to the diagnostician to decide what is equivalent.

omegatyrant wrote:
Who has ever said that hearing is a disorder? Source for this? I'm sorry, but it seems like you are trying to grasp on to any straw you possibly can here.

http://jme.bmj.com/content/28/5/283.full
Sorry, I'm taking back the term "disorder", and I also dissociate from the homophobic quotation at the end of this article.

My point is: Neither being autistic nor being deaf should be considered an advantage. In both cases, it primarily means the lack of an ability.

Quote:
Interesting, your views on evolution. Do you also feel that there is a "reason" why evolution "created" the Autistic mind? If we are so "flawed," why hasn't natural selection eliminated us yet? [...] How is it that two otherwise NT people, with no Autistic genes going back generations, can still produce autistic children?

For the same reason that fertile people can produce infertile descendants.
Maybe societies with a certain percentage of Aspies even have an evolutionary advantage, but I think it's obvious that Aspies have a disadvantage when it comes to sexual reproduction.

Quote:
Why are autistics increasing in number?

Better awareness? Better diagnosis?