I guess it's possible to judge "how autistic" you are, if you consider the intensity of your autistic traits, but only if you filter out the benefits or drawbacks of your environment and the compensatory strategies you have learned. If you used simply the strength of autistic traits, I believe I am probably more autistic than the average WP member, since I have more traits and still struggle with some things that seem to be easier for most other autistics. But I also seem to experience less distress due to autism than many WP members do, and I have many advantages in my environment and my skill set which lets me compensate to the point that I may one day become independent (hopefully before I am old enough to retire!)
In the end I can't really say one way or the other. Depending on the criteria I used, I could say I was either more autistic, less, or just somewhat qualitatively different (i.e., having more uncommon traits and fewer common ones).
I don't think it matters all that much, though. I've learned a good deal from other autistics. Whether they have stronger traits, milder traits, more difficulty, or less, doesn't seem to matter when it comes to having things in common and being able to teach each other. Even people who aren't quite autistic--subclinical or having some related disorder--have a lot in common with autistic people. You can broaden it even further, and learn even more, by connecting with people who have disabilities, people who have unusual cognitive traits, and minorities in general.
Comparing ourselves to others tends to get pretty complicated, because there just isn't any sort of single axis along which everybody can be arranged. With that in mind, it seems like we're better off just creating a sort of database of all the different experiences we have--collect them, and not worry about putting them in any particular order.