Please analyse/interpret my WAIS results

Post Reply New Topic

I took this in 2008 so it's not new. I just have never understood whether my results were "typical Aspie" or not. Anyone an expert at this type of thing? Can you analyse these results for me?

It looks like one standard deviation between your verbal and performance scores, with the difference repeated to a slightly lesser or slightly greater extent across the remainder of your subscores.

That seems like what is assumed to be "typical Aspie."

I am not really all that great at interpreting things related to WAIS. I mostly noticed whirlingmind's PIQ and VIQ were exactly 15 points apart, which I found interesting, as well as how that pattern replicated across other areas (although not exactly). 15 points in the WAIS is, I believe, one full standard deviation.

The one thing that struck me is that you don't have processing speed deficits. I'm not sure how many Aspies have deficits in that area though. I know I do and I heard somewhere that it's associated with AS.

What struck me is where the therapist twice said the differences are not very unusual for adults my age. This was before I was diagnosed.

This is one of the reasons I'm particularly interested to know if this is "typical Aspie".

They're not so unusual as to be striking on their own. If you pulled an average person off the street and gave them the IQ test and got those scores, you wouldn't think it was too unusual. However, combined with autistic traits, the VIQ/PIQ gap is yet another piece of evidence of atypical cognitive functioning.

It's kind of like this--Say you're looking for Persian cats. If a cat's got long fur (your VIQ/PIQ gap), that's not unusual and it's not enough reason to think it may be Persian (autistic), because VIQ/PIQ gaps aren't that unusual and occur in many people who are quite neurotypical otherwise. But say you have a cat with a short nose and a round head and a stocky body (you have autistic traits), and that cat turns out to also have long fur (the VIQ/PIQ gap), then the long hair adds to the pile of evidence that you're looking at a Persian (an autistic person).

So in someone with autistic traits, the VIQ>PIQ can be said to be consistent with autism, even though it would be fairly unremarkable on its own. Neurotypicals may not have the extreme skill scatter you see in autistics, but they still have strengths and weaknesses, and sometimes those arrange themselves in a way that shows up as a VIQ/PIQ gap.

When I was tested, the Psychologist suggested that people with Aspergers typically test noticeably higher (i.e. by ~ 1 standard deviation) on VIQ (or VCI, if using WAIS-IV) as compared to PIQ (or PRI, if using WAIS-IV). Which is exactly what Verdandi indicated. She suggested that people with Aspergers tend to not be highly Visual (and, hence, have a measurably lower VIQ).

Out of curiosity, I asked the Psychologist about Temple Grandin (who I am almost certain has a PIQ>VIQ). She explained that Dr. Grandin was HFA, not Aspergers.

Honestly, that part of the discussion made me a bit skeptical with the black magic behind the science of psychology. Not to mention the accuracy of my own diagnosis. Ultimately, my poor scores on the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-IV) and Wisconsin Card Sorting test convinced me. I guess. LOL.

The studies differ as to whether VIQ>PIQ is more common in people with ASD, the opposite is more common or whether they're are equally common. One study showed 1/3 of subjects with ASD had VIQ>PIQ, one third PIQ>VIQ and one third PIQ=VIQ. On the other hand, a lot of studies do correlate scattered sub-score with ASD. I agree with Callista that the discrepancy shows some cognitive, neurological abnormality that when combined with symptoms of ASD could be part of the clinical picture. My scores are actually similar to yours. My VIQ is in the superior range but my PIQ is low average/borderline ID range. I was told that the discrepancy between them was as great as it would be for someone who had a right hemisphere stroke. My processing speed is also low average range.

One other thing I noticed was that your comprehension sub-score was consistent with the rest of your VIQ. Most studies show that people with ASD have a comprehension deficit and comprehension is supposed to be indicative of social understanding. However, one recent study showed no comprehension deficit in subjects with ASD. You could find this study in the WP archives, it was posted here in another thread. My comprehension score was also consistent with my VIQ when tested as an adult , though it was considerably lower as a child. Your's might also have been lower as a child and improved over the years.

^^^
Vernandi, you're right that 15 points is exactly one standard deviation on the WAIS.