Page 3 of 6 [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

arielhawksquill
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,830
Location: Midwest

02 Feb 2014, 9:50 am

qawer wrote:
But I know intellectually and from experience that others in fact do attach very much emotion to the rank of people, so I would feel like a fool if I let someone with "lower rank" exploit my feelings by realizing they just needed to treat me well in order to trick me.

For that reason I feel like I cannot escape the ranking aspect when it comes to relationships, because I could never be sure of the intentions on the other part - actually making it quite difficult for me to fall in love the way I feel I was meant to. A "ranking" levelling my own would actually be the only way of convincing me of their intentions (and having AS that really ain't very high!).


I'm not sure what these "low-ranking" women might be trying to "trick" you into doing--having a relationship with them? Of course it is true that there is a better chance of true love and successful communication between equals, so if you're going to try to play the heirarchy game you should try to find a partner in your own "league", as they say.

I hate to tell you this, but when it comes to NT "ranking" YOU are low-ranked because you have a disability. :( All of those fat, ugly, mentally ill, or socioeconomically disadvantaged women you consider below you are actually in your league.



sanahasacat
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2013
Age: 28
Gender: Female
Posts: 32
Location: Truro

02 Feb 2014, 10:14 am

not especially, also i find the entire concept of alphas and betas bloody ridiculous. human beings are not bad werewolf fanfiction.


_________________
Genderfluid (please use neutral ( they/thempronouns), cognitive and motor dyspraxia, possible inattentive-type adhd, maybe schizotypal, atelophobia.

Not autistic at all, but brainweird in a lot of different ways and, besides, I like it here.


qawer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,252

02 Feb 2014, 10:34 am

arielhawksquill wrote:

I hate to tell you this, but when it comes to NT "ranking" YOU are low-ranked because you have a disability. :( All of those fat, ugly, mentally ill, or socioeconomically disadvantaged women you consider below you are actually in your league.


Yep, I know you are right on that one. Aspergers Syndrome makes you VERY low-ranked, the pariah, the social outcast. That might in fact be the big problem, realizing just how much society, not only directly, but also indirectly, in fact despises your real you - so much that not even good looks, long education, good job, etc. can change that to any degree. One could just say I should learn to accept that my personality is flawed because it is not very fit for survival in NT-society, since I am completely outnumbered in the social context.

So being together with one of the girls you mentioned would constantly remind me of my, according to society, flawed personality and would humiliate me on a personal level at any public events being seen together with her (she would not be humiliated due to her personality, only her superficial characteristics, I see that as FAR less bad). See what I mean? And we were supposed to call what we had together love?

I mean, I can accept that my looks have limits, my job-skills are limited etc. I am okay with being "judged" on those things whether they are good or bad. They are just superficial characteristics. But the fact that the personality I am and love is so devalued to others, is quite hard to accept, given you have to "fall in love" and like other people on those conditions. How would that even be possible? They truly hate the real me, but can just come to terms with me because of looks and money!! !

I realize that is the reason I cannot find love. Finding love equates being ridiculed and humiliated, since people realize there has to be some subtle reason (my personality they realize) I put up with that league given my other seemingly "high-ranking" qualities.

I do not know whether I come across as hypocritical here again.



Stannis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631

02 Feb 2014, 11:36 am

Solitudinarian wrote:
I'm not very fond of terms like alpha and beta because they oversimplify things and I associate them with PUA rhetoric, but there definitely is a social pecking order that is based on good looks, attitude and proper social behavior rather than socio-economic status or intellectual abilities. And I'm afraid that aspies are more likely than others to find themselves at the bottom of this pecking order and get cast in the role of the pariah.

Case in point: I was quite successful in my third and last job because it catered to my interests and I really applied myself. Several pay raises, increasingly more responsibility, employer-financed training courses etc. But somehow, I was still the odd one out and the butt end of every joke. Everyone seemed to agree that it was perfectly ok to make fun of me behind my back and be condescending to my face, even the epitome of a village idiot who barely had enough brain cells to operate the trash compactor in the warehouse downstairs. He had the intellect of a six-year-old, but he knew when to nod and smile, when to say "oh no" and when to laugh about some stupid joke. Or about me, for that matter. So he was accepted as part of the gang that formed around the sole purpose of ridiculing the socially inept weirdo who out-earned 80% of them and was still lower than dirt in the social workplace hierarchy.

This experience taught me that it doesn't matter how much you try to contribute to society, nor does it matter how intelligent and educated you are. When people see you as a freak and pariah because you don't greet them with the fakest of smiles and utter drivel like "Oh, what weather we're having! Rarely has it been so weathery at this time of the year! How are your wife's hemorrhoids doing? And isn't that weirdo over there a total tool?", you'll never earn their acceptance or approval. Unless you're rich enough to simply buy it I suppose.


I remember a guy who used to bring his training staves to work because he was attending Kendo classes. He'd just carry them around in a case all day, he said, because he was worried that they would be stolen from his car. Nobody messed with that guy.

Another way of neutralising enemies is by doing them small favours from time to time. The most popular individual I have ever seen in any workplace, I am pretty sure was a drug dealer. An easy legal favour you can do for people is to car pool.



Last edited by Stannis on 02 Feb 2014, 12:34 pm, edited 4 times in total.

qawer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,252

02 Feb 2014, 11:45 am

Solitudinarian wrote:
I'm not very fond of terms like alpha and beta because they oversimplify things and I associate them with PUA rhetoric, but there definitely is a social pecking order that is based on good looks, attitude and proper social behavior rather than socio-economic status or intellectual abilities. And I'm afraid that aspies are more likely than others to find themselves at the bottom of this pecking order and get cast in the role of the pariah.

Case in point: I was quite successful in my third and last job because it catered to my interests and I really applied myself. Several pay raises, increasingly more responsibility, employer-financed training courses etc. But somehow, I was still the odd one out and the butt end of every joke. Everyone seemed to agree that it was perfectly ok to make fun of me behind my back and be condescending to my face, even the epitome of a village idiot who barely had enough brain cells to operate the trash compactor in the warehouse downstairs. He had the intellect of a six-year-old, but he knew when to nod and smile, when to say "oh no" and when to laugh about some stupid joke. Or about me, for that matter. So he was accepted as part of the gang that formed around the sole purpose of ridiculing the socially inept weirdo who out-earned 80% of them and was still lower than dirt in the social workplace hierarchy.

This experience taught me that it doesn't matter how much you try to contribute to society, nor does it matter how intelligent and educated you are. When people see you as a freak and pariah because you don't greet them with the fakest of smiles and utter drivel like "Oh, what weather we're having! Rarely has it been so weathery at this time of the year! How are your wife's hemorrhoids doing? And isn't that weirdo over there a total tool?", you'll never earn their acceptance or approval. Unless you're rich enough to simply buy it I suppose.


Yep, we cannot escape the pariah position, no matter how successful we are at what we actually do in our job.

You cannot avoid being ridiculed in the work place unless you put on that fat, fake smile, all day a long, all week, while acting according to it.



Quote:
How are your wife's hemorrhoids doing?


LoL, the kind of thing they could ask you while you sit concentrating on your work.



Last edited by qawer on 02 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

02 Feb 2014, 11:55 am

qawer wrote:
arielhawksquill wrote:

I hate to tell you this, but when it comes to NT "ranking" YOU are low-ranked because you have a disability. :( All of those fat, ugly, mentally ill, or socioeconomically disadvantaged women you consider below you are actually in your league.


Yep, I know you are right on that one. Aspergers Syndrome makes you VERY low-ranked, the pariah, the social outcast. That might in fact be the big problem, realizing just how much society, not only directly, but also indirectly, in fact despises your real you - so much that not even good looks, long education, good job, etc. can change that to any degree. One could just say I should learn to accept that my personality is flawed because it is not very fit for survival in NT-society, since I am completely outnumbered in the social context.

So being together with one of the girls you mentioned would constantly remind me of my, according to society, flawed personality and would humiliate me on a personal level at any public events being seen together with her (she would not be humiliated due to her personality, only her superficial characteristics, I see that as FAR less bad). See what I mean? And we were supposed to call what we had together love?

I mean, I can accept that my looks have limits, my job-skills are limited etc. I am okay with being "judged" on those things whether they are good or bad. They are just superficial characteristics. But the fact that the personality I am and love is so devalued to others, is quite hard to accept, given you have to "fall in love" and like other people on those conditions. How would that even be possible? They truly hate the real me, but can just come to terms with me because of looks and money!! !

I realize that is the reason I cannot find love. Finding love equates being ridiculed and humiliated, since people realize there has to be some subtle reason (my personality they realize) I put up with that league given my other seemingly "high-ranking" qualities.

I do not know whether I come across as hypocritical here again.


Yes, you are coming across as hypocritical again. Because while you claim to dislike social hierarchies, the substance of your complaint is that you are not as high in the hierarchy as you think you should be. That's not a complaint about the existence of hierarchies. It's an endorsement.



Fortran77
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jan 2014
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 79
Location: Washington, USA

02 Feb 2014, 12:44 pm

I acknowledge that this is a young person's problem, since you are still dealing with school or just heading out on your own for the first time. My advice is to just be who your are and not worry about how you fit in too much - let the Alphas be Alphas and just be yourself.


_________________
There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.


qawer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,252

02 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm

Janissy wrote:
Yes, you are coming across as hypocritical again. Because while you claim to dislike social hierarchies, the substance of your complaint is that you are not as high in the hierarchy as you think you should be. That's not a complaint about the existence of hierarchies. It's an endorsement.


Thank you for making it clear Janissy. I really need to sort this out. I do not desire to be hypocritical.

I do dislike social hierarchies. I wish they were not there.

At the same time I intellectually realize they do exist, because people are differently fit for survival. Those more fit are higher ranked than those less fit.

At the same time I also want to survive. Surviving requires finding a job and a mate (to me at least).



So is the hypocritical stance in fact that I claim to dislike social hierarchies, but still want to survive, and survival (in the given environment) requires accepting and hence giving approval to the social hierarchy?


So if there truly was truth behind my claim that I dislike social hierarchies, I would decide to not want to find job and mate)?


( I did quit my job because of the social hierarchy system in it, even though I liked the job tasks very much).



Last edited by qawer on 02 Feb 2014, 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

02 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm

qawer wrote:

So if there truly was truth behind my claim that I dislike social hierarchies, I would decide to not want to find job and mate)?

.


No. You don't need to do that. But to be true to egalitarian ideals you would need to forego shunning "low status" people. There are entire subcultures built around trying to get away from hierarchies. Seek these subcultures out in your area. I bet they do exist. Locator terms to lok out for are "democratic" and "communitarian".

In a hierarchical workplace you do need to accept orders from your supervisor. But you don't need to idolize them or be contemptuous to those you are authorized to give orders to.

In personal life (finding a mate) it should be easy to act on rejecting social hierarchies. You simply ignore hierarchy markers of those you are attracted to or who are attracted to you. Instead, you use mutual attraction or lack of it to make decisions. If you are focused on the status of a woman who shows attraction to you rather than on whether or not you are attracted to her too, you are still deeply enmeshed in the hierarchy system. If a woman tries to hook up with you and you aren't interested, reject the offer because you aren't interested. No need to bring her status into it.



Marcia
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,148

02 Feb 2014, 1:24 pm

Willard wrote:
qawer wrote:
How does one deal with being (considered) a failure/loser? Disregard the social hierarchy, and try to live life on your own terms?



Or you could spend your entire life flagellating yourself and feeling like a POS based on what you think other people think, and hating yourself for not living up to their standards and expectations. :roll:

But that's not very conducive to productivity. Looks to me like you answered your own question.

Be who you are. F__k 'em if they don't like it. :twisted:

I mean, really, after all, that's all you CAN do. :shrug:


This!



arielhawksquill
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,830
Location: Midwest

02 Feb 2014, 2:08 pm

qawer wrote:
So is the hypocritical stance in fact that I claim to dislike social hierarchies, but still want to survive, and survival (in the given environment) requires accepting and hence giving approval to the social hierarchy?

So if there truly was truth behind my claim that I dislike social hierarchies, I would decide to not want to find job and mate)?


This is the point where your logic breaks down. You've reduced the options to two, when there are actually so many more ways to live.

You could just as easily choose to work in a solitary profession (as a translator, for instance--your English is excellent) and find a nice Aspie girl (maybe via a dating web site) who is your equal and loves you for yourself. You could makes a few friends who share your egalitarian values and never sacrifice your integrity when forced to deal with heirarchies. That way of living would give you much, much more satisfaction that competing with a bunch of macho NTs every day in your workplace and living with a good-looking NT female who doesn't love the real you.



qawer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,252

02 Feb 2014, 2:35 pm

arielhawksquill wrote:
qawer wrote:
So is the hypocritical stance in fact that I claim to dislike social hierarchies, but still want to survive, and survival (in the given environment) requires accepting and hence giving approval to the social hierarchy?

So if there truly was truth behind my claim that I dislike social hierarchies, I would decide to not want to find job and mate)?


This is the point where your logic breaks down. You've reduced the options to two, when there are actually so many more ways to live.

You could just as easily choose to work in a solitary profession (as a translator, for instance--your English is excellent) and find a nice Aspie girl (maybe via a dating web site) who is your equal and loves you for yourself. You could makes a few friends who share your egalitarian values and never sacrifice your integrity when forced to deal with heirarchies. That way of living would give you much, much more satisfaction that competing with a bunch of macho NTs every day in your workplace and living with a good-looking NT female who doesn't love the real you.


I know you are right arielhawksquill. Thanks for writing this. It seems to be difficult for me to live the life I am supposed to be living. Having AS in this world is really a weird experience for me.



arielhawksquill
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,830
Location: Midwest

02 Feb 2014, 2:59 pm

qawer wrote:
I know you are right arielhawksquill. Thanks for writing this. It seems to be difficult for me to live the life I am supposed to be living. Having AS in this world is really a weird experience for me.


You're welcome. I am very interested in how things work out for you, because you are obviously an intellectually gifted and sincerely kind person, and you have a chance to be happy and do some good in the world. We are all strangers in a strange land, here.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

02 Feb 2014, 3:40 pm

Verdandi wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
I'm not alpha, beta, or omega.

My social skills are so poor that I don't even "get on the board."

Furthermore, I believe such distinctions are overly simplistic when applied to humans. Humans have the most complex social system of any primate species, which is exactly why it blows to be autistic.


The notion of alphas came from now discredited research into wolf packs that involved observing packs constructed and observed in captivity, who behaved in ways that wolves do not behave in the wild. It's been generalized to other species (such as baboons and humans) but largely has no valid scientific grounding.

Pickup artists and MRAs love to appeal to the notion of "alpha males" and such but I think they're largely looking for some quality to blame that isn't their own personalities for their dating and relationship difficulties.


Yeah, I know. When I adopted my dog, I read a bunch of books on dog evolution.

Anyway, I believe human social interactions are too complex to easily divide everyone up in alpha/beta/omega/blarg categories. I can get why some autistics are attracted by the idea (it puts "rules" on otherwise inscrutable social goop), but I'm not on board.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


qawer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,252

02 Feb 2014, 3:58 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:

Anyway, I believe human social interactions are too complex to easily divide everyone up in alpha/beta/omega/blarg categories. I can get why some autistics are attracted by the idea (it puts "rules" on otherwise inscrutable social goop), but I'm not on board.


Could you approve on the idea that social ranking is determined by one's ability to survive (i.e. how fit one is in the particular environment) and have offspring with high social status?

It seems to me that NTs intuitive way of ranking people correponds well to that.


If being able to be alone for extended periods of time without becoming depressed suddenly became a big advantage for surviving, AS people would start to become the alphas, because all NTs would be depressed in that environment (similar to the way we are in the current environment).



wozeree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2013
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,344

02 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm

Verdandi wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
I'm not alpha, beta, or omega.

My social skills are so poor that I don't even "get on the board."

Furthermore, I believe such distinctions are overly simplistic when applied to humans. Humans have the most complex social system of any primate species, which is exactly why it blows to be autistic.


The notion of alphas came from now discredited research into wolf packs that involved observing packs constructed and observed in captivity, who behaved in ways that wolves do not behave in the wild. It's been generalized to other species (such as baboons and humans) but largely has no valid scientific grounding.

Pickup artists and MRAs love to appeal to the notion of "alpha males" and such but I think they're largely looking for some quality to blame that isn't their own personalities for their dating and relationship difficulties.


I did not know this had been discredited, Verdandi. Very interesting.

I do see humans social hierarchy as of supreme importance though (to society). It is way more complicated then alpha and beta, but I think a large part of the reason that people with social skill problems are rejected is because they are assumed to be thinking themselves above the rules of the hierarchy.