Page 1 of 4 [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,811
Location: London

28 Feb 2015, 5:59 pm

I strongly agree with Evil_Chuck.

Uranus wrote:
Well, won't cause much harm to try to eliminate MSG if you are sensible.

This is true, there is little to lose except less tasty food. Perhaps it is wasted effort though?
Quote:
i found this list of hidden names for MSG...

I think this is a bit paranoid... most of the things listed aren't MSG. They might be chemically similar compounds. However, glutamate isn't harmful, it's an essential part of our diet; saying we should eliminate protein so we don't consume MSG is potentially very harmful.

The reason manufacturers use different names is because of groundless fearmongering.



Uranus
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 268
Location: UK

28 Feb 2015, 7:11 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
I strongly agree with Evil_Chuck.
Uranus wrote:
Well, won't cause much harm to try to eliminate MSG if you are sensible.

This is true, there is little to lose except less tasty food. Perhaps it is wasted effort though?
Quote:
i found this list of hidden names for MSG...

I think this is a bit paranoid... most of the things listed aren't MSG. They might be chemically similar compounds. However, glutamate isn't harmful, it's an essential part of our diet; saying we should eliminate protein so we don't consume MSG is potentially very harmful.

The reason manufacturers use different names is because of groundless fearmongering.


Nobody said anything about limiting protein.

With horse being added to the UK menu by unscrupulous individuals, forgive me if i feel a little paranoid. I ask you this, how can one country ban Aspartame and the other one use it? Somebodies got to be wrong. I'm not saying it's the case with MSG, but I for one am not taking any risks.



Uranus
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 268
Location: UK

28 Feb 2015, 7:22 pm

Evil_Chuck wrote:
Folks, please hear me out, because as simple as this post is, I sincerely believe it can benefit the entire forum and our discussion of many autism studies going forward.



1. Okay. Let's step back from what the actual facts are for a second, and just think logically about this. Rhetorical show of hands: who agrees that a site called "the MSG Myth" is likely to have an agenda, if not an outright mission, to discourage the use of MSG and/or uncover an alleged conspiracy related to it? (If you don't already concede this, a look at the site itself will remove any doubt.)

2. Another rhetorical show of hands: is it also likely that, because the site's reason for existing is to build a predetermined case that MSG is, quote, "A TERRIBLE HEALTH MENACE" (rather than the objective scientific study of human gastrointestinal physiology), all of its findings and reports may therefore be slanted, cherry-picked, insufficiently peer-reviewed, or propped up with unverifiable anecdotes in order to support that case--or at least to avoid contradicting it?

3. And finally, if we agree that these are reasonable assumptions, isn't it also reasonable that if we really want to understand MSG (or any particular subject for that matter), then the best course is to study reports on it from multiple sources--preferably valid scientific institutions who will follow the evidence wherever it leads, rather than one couple with a dodgy-looking website?



If we can at least agree on that, and I hope we do, then we've basically killed the thread. Because there's really not much else to talk about here until the threadstarter broadens his research into MSG and compares and contrasts what he finds.

In fact, it may be a far more worthwhile endeavor to study the psychological implications of people being fixated on their digestive tract and what they're putting into their bodies. Because every 2 or 3 weeks here on WrongPlanet, literally without fail, we WILL get one of these threads where somebody digs up "[insert food preservative, additive, or bacteria here] causes/exacerbates/is linked to Autism." And there is never any real, objective, peer-reviewed scientific evidence provided for this stuff, but it is still thrown around constantly. If you want an easy answer badly enough, somebody will be more than happy to give it to you. Preferably in exchange for money and attention.

I'm still waiting for Carl Sagan's 'The Demon-Haunted World' to arrive at my house. When I've had time to read that I will probably have more to say about this very human phenomenon, where almost everybody has this deep-seated urge to believe in something illogical or unscientific, and life is just this big thing where everybody stumbles around having to put up with each others' pseudo-scientific beliefs of choice.


I learned enough to know that scientific world is flawed.

Nothing travels faster than the speed of MSG fearmongering... except for that subatomic dollar.



Uranus
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 268
Location: UK

28 Feb 2015, 7:56 pm

So you think this MSG has nothing to do with Autism, but what is this...

Linkage and association of the glutamate receptor 6 gene with autism.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11920157

Now i lack the knowledge to understand most of that, but doesn't this suggest a glutamate imbalance may be related to Autism?



Last edited by Uranus on 28 Feb 2015, 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ominous
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 962
Location: Victoria, Australia

28 Feb 2015, 7:57 pm

Uranus wrote:
So you think this MSG and nothing to do with Autism, but what is this...

Linkage and association of the glutamate receptor 6 gene with autism.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11920157

Now i lack the knowledge to understand most of that, but doesn't this prove that a glutamate imbalance may related to Autism?


Protip: If you lack the knowledge to understand science either get the knowledge or stop trying to evaluate things you don't understand and then ascribe causation to autism. Please and thank you. You are doing us far more harm than good when you do that.



Uranus
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 268
Location: UK

28 Feb 2015, 8:00 pm

ominous wrote:
Uranus wrote:
So you think this MSG and nothing to do with Autism, but what is this...

Linkage and association of the glutamate receptor 6 gene with autism.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11920157

Now i lack the knowledge to understand most of that, but doesn't this prove that a glutamate imbalance may related to Autism?


Protip: If you lack the knowledge to understand science either get the knowledge or stop trying to evaluate things you don't understand and then ascribe causation to autism. Please and thank you. You are doing us far more harm than good when you do that.


Does this look like a scientific forum to you?

I'm not doing any harm, thank you.



ominous
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 962
Location: Victoria, Australia

28 Feb 2015, 8:08 pm

'I haven't got a clue about whether or not the Earth is round, but I think it's flat because I saw the sun go down over the horizon. I am a person, entitled to my opinions based on thin air, and I'm going to stop eating food because food is evil and causes autism, even though science has proven otherwise, etc.'

My brain hurts.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,811
Location: London

28 Feb 2015, 8:14 pm

Ominous, you are being unnecessarily antagonistic and aren't helping.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,811
Location: London

28 Feb 2015, 8:24 pm

Uranus wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
I strongly agree with Evil_Chuck.
Uranus wrote:
Well, won't cause much harm to try to eliminate MSG if you are sensible.

This is true, there is little to lose except less tasty food. Perhaps it is wasted effort though?
Quote:
i found this list of hidden names for MSG...

I think this is a bit paranoid... most of the things listed aren't MSG. They might be chemically similar compounds. However, glutamate isn't harmful, it's an essential part of our diet; saying we should eliminate protein so we don't consume MSG is potentially very harmful.

The reason manufacturers use different names is because of groundless fearmongering.


Nobody said anything about limiting protein.

The list of hidden names for MSG contained several types of protein, and noted that glutamate is produced when proteins encounter protease enzymes. Our bodies produce protease enzymes... In other words, to avoid glutamate, you'd need to avoid protein.
Quote:
I ask you this, how can one country ban Aspartame and the other one use it? Somebodies got to be wrong.

Which countries have banned Aspartame?



Uranus
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 268
Location: UK

28 Feb 2015, 9:23 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
Uranus wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
I strongly agree with Evil_Chuck.
Uranus wrote:
Well, won't cause much harm to try to eliminate MSG if you are sensible.

This is true, there is little to lose except less tasty food. Perhaps it is wasted effort though?
Quote:
i found this list of hidden names for MSG...

I think this is a bit paranoid... most of the things listed aren't MSG. They might be chemically similar compounds. However, glutamate isn't harmful, it's an essential part of our diet; saying we should eliminate protein so we don't consume MSG is potentially very harmful.

The reason manufacturers use different names is because of groundless fearmongering.


Nobody said anything about limiting protein.

The list of hidden names for MSG contained several types of protein, and noted that glutamate is produced when proteins encounter protease enzymes. Our bodies produce protease enzymes... In other words, to avoid glutamate, you'd need to avoid protein.
Quote:
I ask you this, how can one country ban Aspartame and the other one use it? Somebodies got to be wrong.

Which countries have banned Aspartame?


You're presuming that the glutamate they mass produce is the same as the glutamate found in Milk, cheese, vegetables, etc. MSG produced outside the body probably has impurities.

US banned Aspartame twice i think, i'm not sure when.

Here's that study about the Broccoli extract i mentioned earlier...
http://www.pnas.org/content/111/43/15550.abstract

Sulforaphane can protect motor neuron against excitotoxicity according to this.... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20823560

Quote:
Excitotoxic neonatal damage induced by monosodium glutamate reduces several GABAergic markers in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus in adulthood.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19733649
(in rats)



Evil_Chuck
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 494
Location: Lost in my thoughts.

28 Feb 2015, 10:13 pm

Uranus wrote:
Evil_Chuck wrote:
Folks, please hear me out, because as simple as this post is, I sincerely believe it can benefit the entire forum and our discussion of many autism studies going forward.



1. Okay. Let's step back from what the actual facts are for a second, and just think logically about this. Rhetorical show of hands: who agrees that a site called "the MSG Myth" is likely to have an agenda, if not an outright mission, to discourage the use of MSG and/or uncover an alleged conspiracy related to it? (If you don't already concede this, a look at the site itself will remove any doubt.)

2. Another rhetorical show of hands: is it also likely that, because the site's reason for existing is to build a predetermined case that MSG is, quote, "A TERRIBLE HEALTH MENACE" (rather than the objective scientific study of human gastrointestinal physiology), all of its findings and reports may therefore be slanted, cherry-picked, insufficiently peer-reviewed, or propped up with unverifiable anecdotes in order to support that case--or at least to avoid contradicting it?

3. And finally, if we agree that these are reasonable assumptions, isn't it also reasonable that if we really want to understand MSG (or any particular subject for that matter), then the best course is to study reports on it from multiple sources--preferably valid scientific institutions who will follow the evidence wherever it leads, rather than one couple with a dodgy-looking website?



If we can at least agree on that, and I hope we do, then we've basically killed the thread. Because there's really not much else to talk about here until the threadstarter broadens his research into MSG and compares and contrasts what he finds.

In fact, it may be a far more worthwhile endeavor to study the psychological implications of people being fixated on their digestive tract and what they're putting into their bodies. Because every 2 or 3 weeks here on WrongPlanet, literally without fail, we WILL get one of these threads where somebody digs up "[insert food preservative, additive, or bacteria here] causes/exacerbates/is linked to Autism." And there is never any real, objective, peer-reviewed scientific evidence provided for this stuff, but it is still thrown around constantly. If you want an easy answer badly enough, somebody will be more than happy to give it to you. Preferably in exchange for money and attention.

I'm still waiting for Carl Sagan's 'The Demon-Haunted World' to arrive at my house. When I've had time to read that I will probably have more to say about this very human phenomenon, where almost everybody has this deep-seated urge to believe in something illogical or unscientific, and life is just this big thing where everybody stumbles around having to put up with each others' pseudo-scientific beliefs of choice.


I learned enough to know that scientific world is flawed.

Nothing travels faster than the speed of MSG fearmongering... except for that subatomic dollar.

You have utterly failed to acknowledge the meaning of my post, much less refute a single word of it. It is clear by your responses to me and others that you would rather clap your hands over your ears and continue to repeat half-baked ideas you picked up from elsewhere. I hope at the very least that this is serving some kind of therapeutic purpose for you, because it certainly is not going to convince any reasonable person that a naturally occurring amino acid causes autism.


_________________
RAADS-R SCORE: 163.0

FUNNY DEATH METAL LYRICS OF THE WEEK: 'DEMON'S WIND' BY VADER
Clammy frog descends
Demon's wind, the stars answer your desire
Join the undead, that's the place you'll never leave
You wanna die... but death cannot do us apart...


goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

28 Feb 2015, 11:09 pm

Evil_Chuck wrote:
In fact, it may be a far more worthwhile endeavor to study the psychological implications of people being fixated on their digestive tract and what they're putting into their bodies. Because every 2 or 3 weeks here on WrongPlanet, literally without fail, we WILL get one of these threads where somebody digs up "[insert food preservative, additive, or bacteria here] causes/exacerbates/is linked to Autism." And there is never any real, objective, peer-reviewed scientific evidence provided for this stuff, but it is still thrown around constantly. If you want an easy answer badly enough, somebody will be more than happy to give it to you. Preferably in exchange for money and attention.

I'm still waiting for Carl Sagan's 'The Demon-Haunted World' to arrive at my house. When I've had time to read that I will probably have more to say about this very human phenomenon, where almost everybody has this deep-seated urge to believe in something illogical or unscientific, and life is just this big thing where everybody stumbles around having to put up with each others' pseudo-scientific beliefs of choice.


I shared what I learned and have done for myself. It's been my real life experience, and thus very real. Further, I'm not selling anything and don't care about attention.

I believe fully in my own experiences. They're very real; not pseudo-scientific beliefs of choice.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


Uranus
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 268
Location: UK

28 Feb 2015, 11:35 pm

Evil_Chuck wrote:
You have utterly failed to acknowledge the meaning of my post, much less refute a single word of it. It is clear by your responses to me and others that you would rather clap your hands over your ears and continue to repeat half-baked ideas you picked up from elsewhere. I hope at the very least that this is serving some kind of therapeutic purpose for you, because it certainly is not going to convince any reasonable person that a naturally occurring amino acid causes autism.


There's a question mark in my thread title, meaning i'm not sure myself. I'm not trying to convince anyone really, just putting out some ideas, you know, on a chat forum.



Gzac95
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 27
Location: Texas

02 Mar 2015, 3:39 am

MSG is mono-sodium glutamate. While I am no neuroscientist. I am pretty sure being broken down into sodium and gluten doesn't cause autism. There are so many silly things people claim are linked to autism that at this point I usually dismiss them all on face value.

But thinking about this critically, what would a simple flavor additive to that would cause autism? I am pretty certain the chemistry just isn't there.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,811
Location: London

02 Mar 2015, 12:26 pm

Uranus wrote:
You're presuming that the glutamate they mass produce is the same as the glutamate found in Milk, cheese, vegetables, etc. MSG produced outside the body probably has impurities.

Yes, I am. This sort of thing is tested fairly stringently.
Quote:
US banned Aspartame twice i think, i'm not sure when.

Here's that study about the Broccoli extract i mentioned earlier...
http://www.pnas.org/content/111/43/15550.abstract

And is Aspartame banned in the USA now? What do the FDA think about it?

The Broccoli extract study is quite well known around here. IIRC, the major problem with it is that the sample size is very small.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

02 Mar 2015, 2:14 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
And is Aspartame banned in the USA now? What do the FDA think about it?


It's not banned. It's not banned because it's far too profitable for it's producers who spend a lot of money lobbying the government and FDA to keep their product on the market.

Who cares what the FDA thinks about it? Seriously. The FDA is a cruel joke made up of ex-Monsanto employees. If they were actually good at deciding what was healthy for Americans, then Americans would be healthy people... but in reality they're among the most obese unhealthy population on the face of the Earth. Not entirely due to the FDA, but certainly in part.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.