Muia wrote:
chris1989 wrote:
I seem to feel a bit of a loser, not having seen Game of Thrones since series 1 when I've not really been interested in it nor have I read the books and want to read them really, I seem to think everyone's been watching it, even people who are not very interested in it or fans of it. I've been more a Tolkien fan than a George RR Martin fan.
I’m a Tolkien fan too, been tempted to watch/read GoT but still not sure. The very reason that everyone has seen it puts me off if that makes sense.
I understand what you're saying but I think you are making a mistake. After all, Tolkien is
much more popular, and you like that! Tolkien's influence on Martin is very apparent, even though Martin has more modern sensibilities - for example, Martin's hero has friends called Samwell, Pyp, and Dolorous (which is the opposite of Merry), and Samwell fills a very similar role to Samwise.
For a long time the violence and nudity put me off, but it is a genuinely compelling story. As with any story, there are lots of good reasons why a person might think it isn't to their taste, but I would have thought a fan of fantasy would generally be well advised to give it a go. You can always do what I did and cover your eyes whenever there's a gruesome bit.
If you prefer books then I would instead suggest NK Jemisin's Broken Earth trilogy and Patrick Rothfuss' Kingkiller Chronicles as the heirs to Tolkien. But on the screen, Game of Thrones is the closest contender by far.