pezar wrote:
He also suffered a shoulder injury at some point, possibly from improper use of the .22 rifle he had, and thus was unable to swim or hike to safety. The .22 was a poor choice of rifle, he really should have had a 12 gauge shotgun with shot capable of taking down large animals. A .22 won't even kill a human being reliably, much less a moose, meaning that the moose he killed was a matter of luck. Also, going further back,.
I do a lot of target shooting with my family we use 10/22 rugers (.22 LR) Remington 870's (12 gauge shotgun) AR-15 (.223) and a Mini-14 (.223) there is no way they can severely hurt a shoulder. a shotgun might bruise one. He probably got weak from starvation and fell hurting his shoulder or was trying to bring in a moose or elk without quartering it first. Captives who were starved by the Japanese were doing minor things and recieved severe injuries due to starvation. A minor fall could dislocate joints no problem, You are right about him being better off with the shotgun. Shot for small game and deer slugs for moose and elk.
.22's are capable of killing people, ask the families of the .22 caliber killer here in Buffalo. Buffalo had some racist lunatic running around shooting black men with a .22. I think he killed each one of those he shot. I also went to school with a kid who was killed by a .22 riccochete shooting in his basement went through his bicep cutting the artary in his arm. There was also a kid who shot a brown bear with a .22 in Allegany county near the PA boarder he poped it with one shot while trying to scare it away.