Asperger's Syndrome as D&D Character Alignment

Page 6 of 6 [ 89 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

08 Oct 2011, 6:25 pm

Antisocial personality is Evil-aligned, but it's pretty much any Evil.
And yes, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder involves being Lawful.
Borderline and Histrionic... okay, they're Chaotic.
And schizoid personality does have strong true neutral tendencies.

But if you're gonna play a character with a personality disorder, you had better research it thoroughly, or else you'll end up with a walking psychology textbook instead of a proper three-dimensional character.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

08 Oct 2011, 8:16 pm

I got true neutral.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,775
Location: USA

08 Oct 2011, 9:16 pm

Chaotic Neutral, all my anti-king stuff must have made me more evil and chaotic.



Dots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 972
Location: Ontario

08 Oct 2011, 10:21 pm

I've never played D&D, though I would if I had the opportunity to learn.

I scored Lawful Neutral.


_________________
Transgender. Call me 'he' please. I'm a guy.
Diagnosed Bipolar and Aspergers (questioning the ASD diagnosis).

Free speech means the right to shout 'theatre' in a crowded fire.
--Abbie Hoffman


Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,775
Location: USA

08 Oct 2011, 10:29 pm

TheBrain wrote:
When playing D&D I always chose Lawful Good. I couldn't chose anything else. Even though it is a game, I felt bad if I chose something else. I scored Lawful Good, but most of those questions could have used some elucidation.


I often choose the evil side in games, not because I approve of their actions, but because they are usually so much cooler than the good guys, who are usually humans and elves and other boring stuff while evil gets dragons and demons and other non-humaniod stuff, and they are often red and black, my favorite color scheme. I really annoyed at the "racism" in works, always making the humans to good guys and the orcs the bad guys, so I feel sorry for the poor orcs and aliens and demons. Just because something looks ugly doesn't mean its evil!

Not to mention that half the time the so-called good guys are genocidal jerks.



Comp_Geek_573
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 699

08 Oct 2011, 11:28 pm

Neutral Good for me.

Odd with my Asperger's diagnosis, but the other quiz I took (results in sig) indicated I was only about half Aspie, really.


_________________
Your Aspie score: 98 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 103 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits
AQ: 33


Klyne
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 12

08 Oct 2011, 11:43 pm

I got Chaotic Evil. I took this a couple years back and got Lawful Evil. Wonder what that says about me :twisted:



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

09 Oct 2011, 2:21 am

Ganondox wrote:
I often choose the evil side in games, not because I approve of their actions, but because they are usually so much cooler than the good guys, who are usually humans and elves and other boring stuff while evil gets dragons and demons and other non-humaniod stuff, and they are often red and black, my favorite color scheme. I really annoyed at the "racism" in works, always making the humans to good guys and the orcs the bad guys, so I feel sorry for the poor orcs and aliens and demons. Just because something looks ugly doesn't mean its evil!

Not to mention that half the time the so-called good guys are genocidal jerks.
In the past, that might've been the case. But lately--last five years or so--I've seen a big trend in gaming, in general, to think more carefully about what it might be like to be an orc or a troll or a dragon.

As you know, fantasy gaming started out as a branch of wargaming, with the "monsters" made of little more than a block of stats and meant to be tactical challenges for the players. And in much the same way as we don't think about what it might be like to be a chess piece, we didn't think about what life was like for orcs.

Things have changed since then. People have gotten much, much more into the storytelling aspect of it. Instead of just trying to make powerful characters, they're creating three-dimensional people interacting with a much more realistic world.

With the addition of serious storytelling (whether dramatic or humorous or anything in between) came the need to make both the protagonists and antagonists more than just stats. Now, rather than being a guy in shiny armor cutting down orcs willy-nilly because they're worth 10 XP each, your Human Paladin is more likely to be a diplomat trying to protect his home city, investigating who is trying to unbalance the fragile truce between his liege and the nearby orc tribes.

In D&D and many other fantasy worlds there are species which are all, mostly, or often Evil-aligned and I'll admit that does change everything. In the real world of course we've only got one intelligent species (that we know of) and we've got no tendencies toward anything but neutral. In a fantasy world, though, you can expect about half the orcs to be evil, reliably. So your basic paladin is not just facing the reality that orcs are self-aware individuals capable of making moral choices, but that some of them are not going to be the type he can just smite--some of them are innocent. Even more complicated are creatures like red dragons, which are born with the knowledge of the dragon species imprinted on them and thus are born with an evil alignmment... but even the evil alignment doesn't necessarily mean they would justly deserve death (they might just be unscrupulous lawyers).

It's just getting a lot more complicated. You don't have to play Evil to play an interesting character. And, anyway, the genocidal humans you mentioned? Yeah, they're Evil. Even if they don't have it marked on their character sheet, that's what they're playing. And if I were their DM, I'd force them to explain exactly why they were killing things randomly, because "they're worth XP" is not a good enough explanation.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


TheBrain
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 203
Location: Irwin, PA

09 Oct 2011, 8:21 pm

Callista wrote:
Ganondox wrote:
And in much the same way as we don't think about what it might be like to be a chess piece, we didn't think about what life was like for orcs.



I do, also, feel bad for pawns... I'm a headcase.


_________________
You can not blame God for the things that men do.