Upcoming Netflix drama ‘Extraordinary Attorney Woo’

Page 2 of 3 [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,238
Location: Long Island, New York

18 Aug 2022, 9:20 am

Extraordinary Attorney Woo is autistic representation at its best and its worst

Quote:
Extraordinary Attorney Woo begins with an argument. Jung Myung-seok, a senior attorney with Hanbada law firm, objects that CEO Han Seon-young has assigned an autistic lawyer to his team. Seon-young is quick to admonish him. It doesn’t matter that she’s autistic, she says; what matters is that she graduated top of her class from Korea’s most prestigious university.

It’s an immediate introduction to Extraordinary Attorney Woo at its best and worst: text that highlights Myung-seok’s, and Korea’s, ableism while the subtext reinforces the idea that disabled people’s value is derived from what they can contribute.

Is Extraordinary Attorney Woo good representation? The answer is complex. Having watched the series, and spoken to autistic viewers, autism organizations, and an actual autistic attorney, the consensus appears to be yes… and no?

Ableism is pervasive in the West, but there is significantly more stigma surrounding autism and disability in Korea, where the primacy of societal normalcy is traditionally paramount. “There is much more of a sense of shame, not just for individuals with disabilities but also for their families,” says Son Da-eun of Autism Partnership Korea. “Despite the prevalence of autism in Korea” — she tells me Koreans are diagnosed at a rate of 1 in 38, compared to the WHO’s global estimate of 1 in 100 — “you rarely have interactions with persons with autism on a daily basis. Historically, people with autism are kept home, hidden away from the world.”

That’s not to say there is no progress in Korea. Public awareness is slowly shifting, which leads to better accessibility and more service providers. That improving support infrastructure took a hit due to COVID-19, however, and reading through reactions to Extraordinary Attorney Woo it’s clear autism and disability remain intensely stigmatized in Korea — the extent of which becomes apparent when reading how many parents felt forced to emigrate for better support for their autistic children.

In that vein, it’s appropriate that the series starts with Young-woo’s difficulty finding work. According to the Employment Development Institute of Korea, only 22% of autistic people in the country are employed — the lowest rate of any demographic, and a proportion is echoed globally.

In highlighting the realities of discrimination through the microcosmic lens of Hanbada, Extraordinary Attorney Woo excels. Though it stops short of ever challenging the system that drives those realities, it frequently emphasizes the issues within. For instance, while Young-woo’s ableist colleague Kwon Min-woo is often reprimanded for his efforts to undermine Young-woo, the show never tries to challenge where that ableism is coming from or how Hanbada is latently encouraging it by withholding censure.

Woo Young-woo and her coworker sitting at a conference table. She is poring over documents while he sits and looks slightly consternated.

In this way, Extraordinary Attorney Woo aptly illustrates what moving through a (often hostile) world with autism can feel like. “I felt extremely represented,” Haley Moss, an autistic attorney and neurodiversity advocate, tells me. “People typically are very nice to me,” she says. “But a lot of the time they offer me unwanted and unneeded assistance and it ends up looking like special treatment that makes me (and everyone else) sort of uncomfortable.”

So, too, is the show relatable for Stephanie Bethany, an autistic content creator, who felt particular affinity with Young-woo’s mannerisms and story.

“Attorney Woo does finger and hand stims like I do,” she says in an email, “wears her headphones as needed and not 24/7 like I do, gets into a romantic relationship with someone who is not autistic like I have, engages in occasional echolalia and hits her head/ears when things become escalated, threatening, and loud like I do. So, there are many ways that I feel represented by Attorney Woo.”

The ultimately supportive nature of Young-woo’s colleagues has led some to criticize the show for being too fantastical.

Offering comfort like that, it’s no wonder that Extraordinary Attorney Woo has found an audience among the disabled community. When we’re so used to being chronically underrepresented, it sometimes feels like, as a community, we’re ready to accept any relatable moment in film and television. And even shows that are aiming to do good can fall short. Extraordinary Attorney Woo is no exception.

The creators of the show talk about bringing more attention to autism in Korea. But there is an ableist undertone that feeds into the show, starting with the title before it was altered for Western audiences. The Korean title, 이상한 변호사 우영우, is most accurately translated to Weird Lawyer Woo Young-woo.

One can perhaps understand what the show is trying to do: highlight a perceived otherness that may ultimately be dispelled for some viewers. Instead, it feels like the show is starting from an ableist, allistic place rather than invoking meaningful support for autistic people. That they’ve since introduced a Woo Young-woo NFT collection hasn’t helped make the series seem like it was firmly built on altruistic motivations.

Writer Moon Ji-won purportedly spent a year consulting with an early childhood special education professor to ensure accuracy. Research is fine, but how you implement it is more important. And Moon’s characterization of Young-woo as a genius savant, in line with so many stereotypical depictions of autism that refuse to go away, is particularly telling.

Rain Man is older than me and I still have to talk about it!” Moss says, exasperated. The way Young-woo is characterized, as a genius savant (known as the prodigious savant), represents less than 75 people in the world.

The extensive use of savants-like characters and other autistic tropes (e.g., limited interests, difficulty making friends) in television is concerning for two reasons,” Sarah Audley wrote in her 2020 study into autistic representation in television. “The exclusion of authentic autistic representation, and the spread of misinformation about autism that may be perpetuated by the prevalence of autism stereotypes in the entertainment industry.”

It’s depressing, because the diverse realities of disability are intrinsically human stories that deserve more than stereotypical representation, rather than merely molding us into something palatable and misleading for non-disabled viewers.

Da-eun tells me Extraordinary Attorney Woo “strips some of the shame and stigmatization” from autism through its humanizing of Young-woo, though she recognizes “the show does reinforce a few common misconceptions about the nature and treatment of autism.”

“The fact that the vast majority of characters with autism in media is portrayed as having a superpower, or that autism is really a blessing in disguise muddies the waters and can confuse the public as to what autism really is.”

The effect of that reinforcement is already being felt in Korea. Allistic content creators are imitating Young-woo’s voice patterns and mannerisms for views on TikTok and YouTube, driven by the decision to exaggerate many of Young-woo’s mannerisms that could be considered cute or quirky.

This isn’t new. Lydia Netzer calls it “cute autism,” depictions that strip away behaviors that might be off-putting or obtrusive to create an image as close as possible to neurotypicality in order to “trick us into thinking tolerance is easy.”

Meanwhile, Korean schoolchildren are reportedly insulting each other by asking, “Are you Woo Young-woo?” Autistic content creators field comments expressing disappointment they’re not like Young-woo, while receiving abuse for their criticisms of the series.

Wevcan laud the show’s alleged intent to bring better awareness to autism in a country that intensely stigmatizes it — and with an average nationwide viewership of around 13%, it is putting autism in front of a lot of Korean people. Yet, we also need to question how easily Extraordinary Attorney Woo’s stereotypical depiction of autism and disability is inspiring further narrow-mindedness. That the lesson the show is teaching its allistic, non-disabled target audience is just… more ableism.

Perhaps I’m an optimist, but I do believe some people will watch Extraordinary Attorney Woo and begin to think differently about autism and disability.

But the facade is brittle; it’s easy to peel away. Once you do, you understand how much the ableism that pervades Korea — and, let’s get real, that pervades the world — has seeped into the making of Extraordinary Attorney Woo.

But, if things are worse in Korea, shouldn’t we be asking more of representation like this rather than accepting less?

I’m happy for those that relate to the show. I think, on an individual basis, that’s important. But it’s just as vital to remember that this is but one of many very narrow — often identical — windows into autism in media, and that we’re not the monolith shows like ”Weird Lawyer Woo Young-woo” make us out to be.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


MrsPeel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2017
Age: 52
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,744
Location: Australia

18 Aug 2022, 5:45 pm

Well, yeah, I get where the author of that article is coming from. Having series revolving around autistic savant characters can give the impression we're all like that.

But when you get down to it, people are watching these series to be entertained. They're not going to watch the daily struggles of "Ordinarily autistic almost-attorney Woo", who drops out of work within 3 episodes because she doesn't have the memory abilities to offset her autism. Or "The could-have-been-good doctor", who fails to get enough respect from colleagues to hang onto his surgery role and gets shunted off to be a medical archivist or something.

How about allowing the general public get over autism stigma with savants first, and later they might be ready to accept the rest of us.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,238
Location: Long Island, New York

19 Aug 2022, 5:20 am

MrsPeel wrote:
Well, yeah, I get where the author of that article is coming from. Having series revolving around autistic savant characters can give the impression we're all like that.

But when you get down to it, people are watching these series to be entertained. They're not going to watch the daily struggles of "Ordinarily autistic almost-attorney Woo", who drops out of work within 3 episodes because she doesn't have the memory abilities to offset her autism. Or "The could-have-been-good doctor", who fails to get enough respect from colleagues to hang onto his surgery role and gets shunted off to be a medical archivist or something.

How about allowing the general public get over autism stigma with savants first, and later they might be ready to accept the rest of us.

I don't have a Netflix subscription so I can not judge Extraordinary Attorney Woo but The Good Doctor does show plenty of meltdowns which IRL would get him fired.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Diverse4Me
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2022
Age: 48
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 140
Location: Canberra, Australia

24 Aug 2022, 2:27 am

Fnord wrote:
I enjoyed both "Mrs. Cop" series' (the 1st more than the 2nd), so I am looking forward to this new show.

Korean TV relies more on characters and plot than on sexual situations and violence (e.g., American TV).


Kinda, but also a lot more soppy romantic influence - couldn't watch much of original Good Doc cos it was OTT with melodramatic music and stuff, but my memory may be playing up.

I've watched a few too... was enjoying it more at first, but by fifth episode, I'm getting triggered by stereotypes.

Also, what do you guys think of the cis-male bias of autistic traits as opposed to more normal cis-female traits?

D


_________________
Drew, occasionally writing @ https://diverse4.me

ASD2, ADHD, Anxiety, Depression etc


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,238
Location: Long Island, New York

27 Aug 2022, 8:23 pm

‘Extraordinary Attorney Woo’ Season 2 on Netflix: Renewed for Second Season

Quote:
Netflix’s most popular weekly K-drama of the Summer, Extraordinary Attorney Woo, is being renewed for a second season, and is expected to arrive sometime in 2024! We’ll be keeping track of everything you need to know about Extraordinary Attorney Woo season 2 on Netflix.

Lee Sang Baek, the CEO of ASTORY had the following to say about season 2;

"Thanks to the support of many people, we will produce Season 2 of ‘Extraordinary Attorney Woo.’ The goal is to air Season 2 in 2024."

Given the overwhelming popularity of the series, it should come as no surprise that a second season is happening. In South Korea, the finale saw its biggest audience share of the entire season, amassing a nationwide rating of 17.534%. Extraordinary Attorney Woo now sits in 7th place as South Korea’s highest-rated cable television drama of all time. When you take into consideration the first episode received less than 1% of the nationwide ratings, its meteoric rise is that much more impressive.

When the announcement was made that Extraordinary Attorney Woo would be returning for a second season, ASTORY CEO Lee Sang Baek stated there are no plans to replace the cast, and if there are no unexpected changes then the goal is to bring back at least 90% of the cast from season 1.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Minuteman
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

Joined: 23 Jan 2020
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 233

31 Aug 2022, 9:54 pm

Just watched the first episode. It hit a lot of the typical traits with the fixation on whales, sensory issues, deep obsession with the law, vivid flashbacks and the inability to look people in the eye -- maybe to an extreme. It also caught the confusion of others as to how to deal with her -- do you go out of your way to help, or let her sink or swim on her own. Maybe a little too overdramatic but it's good entertainment.



binstein
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2021
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 134

02 Sep 2022, 3:39 am

I watched the series and I liked it, and I admit it was because the MC is attractive and adorable, which leads me to agree with the criticism about "cute autism" and making people easier to accept autistic people as long as they are as cute and attractive as the main character.

So I don't buy the "good representation" bit, but I did enjoy the show, it was well....cute.



Minuteman
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

Joined: 23 Jan 2020
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 233

03 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm

Just watched episode 2. It's starting to remind me of Ally McBeal, for those of you old enough to remember that show.



Minuteman
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

Joined: 23 Jan 2020
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 233

14 Sep 2022, 3:35 pm

I just watched the episode where Woo finds out who her mother is. If South Korea has Emmy Awards, that episode would win several.



CosmicFerrets
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 22 May 2022
Gender: Female
Posts: 30
Location: Australia

18 Sep 2022, 3:37 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Netflix K-Drama ‘Extraordinary Attorney Woo’ Coming to Netflix in June 2022
Quote:
Extraordinary Attorney Woo is an upcoming internationally licensed South Korean Netflix Original law drama directed by Yoo In Shik, and written by screenwriter Moon Ji Won. Yoo In Shik is known for his work on Dr. Romantic, Vagabond, and Mrs. Cop, As for Moon Ji Won, Extraordinary Attorney Woo is only the second series written by her, the first was Innocent Witness

When is the Extraordinary Attorney Woo Netflix release date?
At the time of publishing the first episode of the Extraordinary Attorney Woois coming to Netflix on Wednesday, June 29th, 2022.

The series will have a total of sixteen episodes, and new episodes released twice a week on Wednesdays and Thursdays for a total of 8 weeks. The finale will air on Sunday, October 2nd, 2022.

Each episode will have an approximate runtime of 60 minutes.

What is the plot of Extraordinary Attorney Woo?
27-year-old lawyer Woo Young Woo graduated at the top of her class at the prestigious Seoul National University for college and law school. Boasting an impressive memory, a wonderfully creative thought process, and a 164 IQ score. However, due to her Aspergers Syndrome, she still finds herself struggling in everyday interactions.

Why do autistic characters always have to have ridiculous IQ's? This is why I prefer Atypical. Even though this character is an Asian woman like me, whilst the guy in Atypical is a caucasian male, he is far more relatable and IMO a more realistic depiction of ASD.

When I was diagnosed as a kid all I knew about ASD were these types of portrayals. It really f****d me up when I realised I wasn't some kind of amazing genius as a kid because then I was like - what's the point of being autistic if I'm not gifted? Then you're just weird. There's no positives to outweigh the flaws.

I mean, I feel now that there are other positives (no NT would have stuck with my special interests the way I have), and I feel these are shown quite well in Atypical.



Fern
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,339

03 Oct 2022, 4:34 pm

I just finished watching the show. I can see where people are coming from with a lot of these previous comments. I think they are all valid. That being said, I really liked the show.

The first thing that struck me about this series is how relatable the main character was to me, because they took an inside-out perspective, and for the first time I can recall, did a decent job at it. When someone said something about the difficulty of being the parent of an autistic child, or of being the boss of an autistic employee, or dating an autistic person, they showed how hearing that made Woo feel, and how the people around her had to learn to change their way of thinking. I think NTs need to hear this. They need to know that their inconveniences are trivial relative to ours.

As for the fact that she is HFA being criticized, well I think that's tough because autistic characters have to be somewhere on the spectrum. No one person can portray everyone. If she was very low functioning it would perpetuate the misconception that you are not really autistic if you can hold a conversation.

I like the fact that she's a woman too, because really, all genders besides male are underrepresented in media depiction of autism. I felt like I could relate more to her than the various male savant characters portrayed over the years. I have often come into conflict in my life with the notion of women as emotional nurturers of often emotionally clueless men. I am unable to play that role in my life, and have been shamed for it in various ways. I feel like depictions of only male HFA characters perpetuates this unhealthy NT-designed dynamic. I like seeing someone fall in love with Woo, not in spite of her autism, but as a part of what makes her her.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,238
Location: Long Island, New York

06 Oct 2022, 9:46 am

Commentary: Neurodivergence is not a gift. Saying we have ‘superpowers’ does not erase the struggles
Grace Yeoh is a senior journalist with CNA.

Quote:
My favourite character in Extraordinary Attorney Woo – the South Korean Netflix hit about an autistic lawyer – is not the titular character, endearing as the underdog narrative may be.

It is Woo Young-woo’s supervisor, Attorney Jung Myung-seok.
When Woo first joins the law firm, Jung doesn’t hide his hesitance to welcome her to his team due to her awkwardness. But he reluctantly gives her a chance to handle her first case after the firm’s CEO agrees that he can dismiss her if she doesn’t perform.

Throughout the series, Jung slowly warms up to Woo’s behaviour. While he remains perplexed by her immediate echolalia (the repetition of certain phrases or sounds made by another person) or her seemingly irrelevant references to whales during conversations, his pride is evident when she shines in court thanks to her intelligence and photographic memory.

And by the end of the series, having grown to appreciate her, his jibes at her mannerisms are more affection than annoyance.

Even though Jung’s initial reactions might rub some the wrong way, I see him as a part-accurate, part-aspirational depiction of those who may harbour ingrained, albeit unintentional, ableism – but who also attempt to overcome their internalised bias by getting to know autistic individuals personally.

With society’s penchant for an underdog success story, the popularity of Extraordinary Attorney Woo has reignited interest in autism narratives.

The 16-episode series has received valid criticism that it paints an overly fantastical portrait of autistic individuals, by leaning into the savant stereotype. This narrative tends to turn neurodivergent behaviours into cute quirks, for the benefit of a neurotypical society.

Society operates according to neurotypical benchmarks – that is, brain functions, behaviours and processing that are considered standard or typical.

And autism, as a neurodevelopmental condition, falls under the umbrella of neurodiversity, which describes the idea that people experience the world in many different ways. Simply put, there is no single “right” way of thinking, learning and behaving.

Yet, despite a growing awareness of neurodiversity, stereotypes around autistic individuals remain prevalent - and the show doesn’t shy away from this reality.

Some have said that the ableism Woo faced from her colleagues displays actual treatment towards the autistic community in reality.

Characters like Jung as well as fellow junior lawyer Attorney Kwon Min-woo, who was jealous and resentful of Woo, simply show that not everyone will immediately embrace autistic or other neurodivergent individuals. Their behaviours are not meant to reinforce discrimination but reflect it.

Moreover, while there may be autistic individuals who do excel because of their condition, the reality for the majority is far more complex. Keep in mind too that savant syndrome is rare, with experts estimating that about 10 per cent of the autistic population have such abilities in varying degrees.

Several episodes in Extraordinary Attorney Woo attempt to strike this balance.

For all its stereotyping, Extraordinary Attorney Woo is a commendable effort to inject nuance into existing narratives about autism.

Traditionally, autistic individuals are portrayed in the media as having low neurological development, who need caregivers to complete the simplest of tasks.

To counter this narrative, many of us seek to empower autistic individuals and their loved ones by focusing on stories where high-performing autistic individuals like Woo achieve conventional success precisely due to their autistic traits, such as inordinate attention to detail or routine.

In this narrative, autism is painted as a superpower. It intends to empower autistic individuals and their loved ones by showing that autistic individuals can achieve such success because of their autism, rather than in spite of it.

It also increases awareness that the condition falls on a spectrum, and even shows employers how they can support neurodiversity in their companies.

But narratives that gloss over the genuine struggles of living with a neurodevelopmental condition, especially one that presents various challenges including mental health issues due to societal misconceptions, may end up more invalidating than empowering.

For autism awareness month in April last year, I worked with a colleague on several articles about such autistic individuals with low support needs. I was struck by two main schools of thought.

The first advocates for society to embrace autism as a “difference in ability”, rather than a disability. For these individuals, autism is a core part of one’s identity, so it is impossible to separate the individual from their autism.

It also advocates that true acceptance means individuals shouldn’t be expected to alter their behaviours to fit in.

The other school of thought tends to acknowledge that living with a neurodevelopmental condition like autism fundamentally puts someone at a disadvantage. So enhancing one’s life necessitates adjusting to neurotypical ways, such as learning how to interact in social situations or developing greater emotional intelligence.

Picking up these skills might be seen as “masking”, which is frowned upon in some neurodivergent communities as it implies an inability to be one’s true self, but this perspective frames it as realistically managing the condition to live in neurotypical society. It is less about pandering to neurotypicals, but about helping one feel more comfortable.

Since working on those articles, I’ve learnt that I have ADHD and I better understand both schools of thought as a result since they overlap with how ADHDers see ourselves.

I am also more aware that shows like Extraordinary Attorney Woo are simply a conversation starter towards greater acceptance and understanding of autistic individuals. They shouldn’t be expected to represent or resonate with all autistic lives.

Such criticism can also be seen in a more positive light. That it remains impossible for a show to encompass every experience only implies that society now realises and understands that autistic people are multidimensional and unable to fit into a singular portrayal.


That said, while the media can reinforce narratives, it can also reframe them.

Stories of empowerment should aim to paint a nuanced, realistic picture of everyday life. It requires validating the less palatable aspects of autism, such as obtrusive mannerisms or tactless honesty, while showcasing its gifts.

It is tempting to frame neurodivergent individuals as savants or gifted rebels, but placing us on a pedestal isn’t quite the acceptance we seek. It can occasionally even feel like we’re being handled with kid gloves.

Acceptance doesn’t just mean harnessing our strengths. It also requires society to acknowledge and help us navigate our weaknesses rather than reinforce our shame around them by ignoring or fixating on these weaknesses.

After all, even neurotypicals know this: True empowerment comes from being seen for who we are, not for what others want to see.

This column went to a different place then the headline implied.

This was one of the best columns I have read about our condition. Thank you Grace and thank you CNA for allowing Grace to share.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


MaxE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,224
Location: Mid-Atlantic US

08 Oct 2022, 8:09 am

I have seen two episodes so far. I confess I haven't seen that much Korean content. I am led to believe that in Asia, societal change is at best a thin veneer over a hard core of tradition. A couple of things that seemed significant to me. At the end of the 2nd episode, the Hanbada colleagues meet over dinner, and everybody except Young-Woo drinks soju. Her boss says, you don't have to drink, but it's my understanding that IRL everybody would be pressured to drink. So after seeing this, will young Koreans start rebelling against the pressure to drink at after-work get-togethers? Also, it's my understanding that Young-Woo will become a romantic interest. I am please to see that she would be portrayed as somebody who could be considered seriously in that way, because the general impression I have gotten is that showing serious romantic interest in somebody with obvious ASD traits is usually frowned upon, not just in Asia, in fact one could be accused of taking advantage of such a person should one decide to court them. This could be liberating for some autistic people just as when it became acceptable to be in a serious relationship with a representative of a racial group other than one's own.


_________________
My WP story


himmellaufen
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

Joined: 3 Oct 2022
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 96

12 Oct 2022, 6:57 am

Tbh as far as korean shows go, I found "Stranger" to be much better accidental portrayal of autism. The mc is supposed to be after life changing brain surgery, not autistic, but his behavior seems to be much more so than all these quirky mascot characters like Woo or Han Geo-ru from Move to Heaven



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,238
Location: Long Island, New York

28 Oct 2022, 10:47 am

Lawyer with autism explores Netflix series 'Extraordinary Attorney Woo'

Haley Moss is a nonpracticing lawyer, neurodiversity expert and the author of four books that guide neurodivergent people through professional and personal challenges. She is a consultant to top corporations and nonprofits that seek her guidance in creating a diverse workplace and a sought-after commentator on disability rights. The first openly autistic lawyer in Florida, Moss’ books include Great Minds Think Differently: Neurodiversity for Lawyers and Other Professionals and The Young Autistic Adult’s Independence Handbook. Her articles have appeared in outlets including the Washington Post, Teen Vogue and Fast Company

Quote:
I am almost always hesitant to watch stories about autism on TV. I find them extremely stressful because neurotypical creators and actors have a way of consistently “getting it wrong”: focusing on young boys; emphasizing traits in a way that feels like someone is checking them off from a list rather than fleshing out a whole human character; and almost consciously hitting upon every single stereotype.

It’s a major “outsider looking in” moment for me, where I find myself mostly wondering silently, “Is this how people perceive me?” And when I fear the answer is “yes,” I feel that sense of dread that comes with being deeply misunderstood.

When the Korean drama Extraordinary Attorney Woo came on my radar, I was skeptical but also excited and curious. The show is about an autistic lawyer who creatively solves her clients’ problems yet struggles immensely with social interactions and the assumptions colleagues, clients and others make based on her autism.

This show goes beyond most stereotypes by featuring an autistic woman as its protagonist (autistic women historically go undiagnosed or supported); she does not work in the sciences or technology (a common trope); and of course, the show features lawyers. Lawyers with disabilities or who are neurodivergent are historically underrepresented in the profession. The National Association for Law Placement’s 2021 Report on Diversity in U.S. Law Firms shares that 1.22% of lawyers self-report having a disability, and on TV, about 3.5% of characters who are series regulars have disabilities.

While main character Woo Young-woo’s colleagues eventually come around to being extremely accepting, the show is lauded as being groundbreaking in Korea, where the perception of autism and available services are very different than here in the United States. In fact, the show’s Korean title is understood to mean “Weird”—rather than “Extraordinary,” as it translates in English—which reinforces the perception there that autistic people are strange and rare.

I found Young-woo, the titular attorney, to be endearing and relatable. Attorney Woo is very routine driven, often eating the same foods day after day—something that brings me comfort, as trying new foods makes me anxious—I don’t always know what to do with new tastes and textures, even when applied to familiar foods.

My noise-canceling headphones save me from crying babies on airplanes and sensory overload; Young-woo similarly wears hers nearly everywhere in public to drown out overwhelming sounds. And she’s creative, passionate and wants the same things most everyone else does—employment, acceptance, happiness and a shot at love.

In some ways, the show even challenges westernized autism perceptions. In the third episode titled “This is Pengsoo,” Young-woo is tapped to represent an autistic client who has much higher support needs than she does and speaks minimally. She understands their experiences with autism are different, yet still connected.

At the end of the episode, there is a monologue about how she and the client, merely 80 years ago, would have been deemed unworthy of life and mentions more recent historical context that emerged about Hans Asperger and his ties to the Nazis’ eugenics program. She tells the audience, “To the Nazis, people who were not worthy of living were those who were physically disabled, terminally ill, or mentally ill, including autistic people.”

There was, however, a missed opportunity for self-advocacy in that episode and throughout the series. Typically, as an autistic lawyer, I am not only expected to be a zealous advocate for others (which comes the easiest), but also for myself (which is much harder). I constantly have to share my needs and how to best support me. This was true even while in law school, when I didn’t have the same fully fleshed-out advocacy skills that both new and seasoned attorneys develop.

I have had acceptance and accommodations at work like Young-woo, yet I was offered help I didn’t always need. I had to put in extra effort to prove my competence and capabilities beyond the technology-savvy stereotype. I always wanted to do more research and writing while in practice, but often I was assumed to be the right person to run the website, hyperfocus on the monotonous task of document review, or do other computer-based tasks.

While attorney Woo is assigned cases right off the bat, she doesn’t always take the next step of speaking up for herself and relies on the kindness of others rather than fully forging her own path. I’m not sure if Young-woo’s lack of self-advocacy comes with the territory of the show being written by and starring neurotypical people trying to portray a lived experience they don’t have, or if something may get lost across cultures.

There are some additional pitfalls to the show. As another autistic lawyer pointed out in her criticism, the show doesn’t feature autistic masking, or the suppression of certain neurodiverse traits.

As someone who has masked and suppressed neurodivergent traits throughout her lifetime to avoid bullies at school, make friends and appear professionally and socially competent in certain situations, it surely is a difficult and relatable experience that wasn’t conveyed in Extraordinary Attorney Woo.

Finally, the show has some of the exaggerations of autistic traits, and the creators did not consult with any autistic people nor cast autistic actors. Young-woo is painted as a savant, and many of us, myself included, simply are not. Her passion for whales is disruptive in her everyday life and sometimes mixes in unique and unexpected ways with her passion for the law; my passions can be siphoned into different pieces of my life.

My autism is not my sole defining characteristic or identity, but one of many things that makes me who I am. It colors my every experience: how I view the world, the strategies and solutions I come up with as an attorney, the way I navigate the world, and the passions and interests I hold dear. Outside of law, I am an artist and avid video game player, though my love of drawing and painting and games never obsessively entered, interfered with or augmented my practice and strategy the way Young-woo’s love of whales does.

I’m hopeful for the future of autism representation. While Extraordinary Attorney Woo took only a small step forward in the United States, it took a massive leap in other parts of the world.

bolding=mine


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


WonderWoman
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2008
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 312
Location: California

20 Feb 2023, 12:02 am

I loved this movie! I highly recommend watching The Extraordinary Attorney Woo, a Korean movie about an autistic young woman who becomes an attorney. It was very heart warming. I think it will give you encouragement to focus on your strengths. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxeXECe2t-c


_________________
"Me voici donc seul sur la terre, n'ayant plus de frère de prochain d'ami de société que moi-même." Jean-Jacques Rousseau
"Do not think, 'I am alone.'" Sasaki Roshi
WonderWoman