The Accountant 2
ASPartOfMe
Veteran

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 37,670
Location: Long Island, New York
The Accountant 2 director talks ‘humanizing’ autism amid RFK Jr.’s recent 'ignorant' remarks
Ben Affleck stars in the sequel as Christian Wolff, a high-functioning autistic man who not only manages to pay his taxes but was also a highly in-demand CPA (of sorts) to some very powerful people. At least, that’s how we’re initially introduced to him in the first film. We soon learn, however, that Wolff is no ordinary bean counter. In fact, he’s a black market accountant to some of the world’s scariest people, helping them hide their blood money, for a fee, before quietly turning them over to the authorities. (A CPA with a conscience!)
Oh, and he’s also an expert in weapons and hand-to-hand combat thanks to his military vet dad, who brutally trained him and his brother Braxton (played by Jon Bernthal) to fight like little Green Berets from the time they were old enough to throw a punch. Still, Wolff’s most powerful weapon is his neurodivergency, which he wields like a superpower, quickly and dispassionately solving complex puzzles in ways his neurotypical counterparts, like his brother, could never imagine.
While the sequel does away with a lot of the first film’s accounting lingo in favor of more action and laughs, Wolff’s past as a tax expert, along with his high-functioning autism, feels especially pertinent in light of recent comments from U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Asked about those comments and the way autism is portrayed in the film, The Accountant 2 director Gavin O’Connor tells Entertainment Weekly, “I had heard that about RFK Jr., that he said that. I cannot believe that a man so intelligent would say something so dumb."
He adds, “There are a lot of things I like about him, and I'm rooting for him, but I was just dumbfounded that he would say something like that. It's such an ignorant thing to say.”
for how the film portrays the disorder, O’Connor says, “For us, it was just about humanizing the character. That's really what it's about.”
And this time, the director notes, many of the characters with autism are portrayed by actors with autism. Like most superheroes, Wolff is aided in his efforts by the proverbial “guy in the chair” — but here, it’s Justine, a woman with nonverbal autism who communicates via computer. Justine works at Harbor Neuroscience, this film’s version of the Xavier School for Gifted Youngsters, where Wolff was sent to live after his dad died. There, Justine leads a team of gifted young hackers, all on the spectrum, who help Wolff do everything from spying on private citizens to hacking traffic lights.
“All the kids in the movie and Justine, they're all somewhere on the spectrum,” O’Connor says. “And what did I do with them? [I said], ‘Teach me; how would you do this? What would you do? How would you approach this? You become the character, and you tell me.’ And that's what they did.”
In the first film, O’Connor relied on a host of experts to craft Affleck’s character. “Chris is on the high-functioning end of the autism spectrum, but you can't settle on a diagnosis. They're as different as people who are neurotypical. So we have to figure out the uniqueness and specificity of where Chris is on the spectrum and how that manifests itself.
He adds, “On the first movie, I surrounded myself with experts. I did a massive amount of research. Ben and I would go and sit down in classroom environments with all these men, mostly men on the spectrum, adults with whom we can ask questions and have dialogue.”
The director recalls with a laugh that when they held the first meeting of this kind, “everyone showed up in Batman T-shirts,” in honor of Affleck’s turn as the Dark Knight.
In the near-decade that has passed since the first film came out, O’Connor says Affleck’s connection and understanding of the character have only deepened.
“What was interesting is that in the time that went by, what happened in Ben's life, without giving too much information — I'll say this because he's spoken about it — but in his life since the first one, he was much closer to someone who's on the spectrum in a day-to-day basis,” he explains.
And that really started to inform minute to minute, day to day, what that's like. And he and I had many conversations about that," he adds. "So, there's a richer, deeper Christian, or Ben now, inhabiting the character because of what he's experienced over these last years with really rubbing up against it.”
Affleck discussed his closeness with the material in a recent interview with the Associated Press. "The need to really understand this role and present it in a way that had authenticity, integrity, compassion, empathy, and understanding was the most important thing to me about this movie," he told the outlet.
"In my own personal life, in the intervening years, it’s something that I’ve come to understand a lot better and have more compassion for and a deeper and richer understanding of it," he continued. "One of the things I learned from people about whom I care very much is how much humor, warmth, [and] just sort of wonder and splendor there often is under sometimes an implacable surface."
The Accountant is now in theaters.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Brian0787
Veteran

Joined: 19 Aug 2024
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,394
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Brian0787
Veteran

Joined: 19 Aug 2024
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,394
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
The original accountant was a good movie, quite entertaining. The one man superhero who kills hundreds and gets out unharmed, like a 21st century Rambo.
It tapped into the whole autism superpower narrative that Hollywood likes and interests NTs, until they realise its not real and become disappointed when the autistic person they know cant do anything superpowerish.
Then they get bored have nothing to do with that person again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzGIFkin5v0
_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."
- George Bernie Shaw
I really liked the first movie and I am planning to watch the second tomorrow. Of course he's larger than life in the same way that a lot of Hollywood action heroes are, but personally I find him in many ways more relatable than the standard formula physically weak and "nerdy" autistic character like that Sheldon guy or The Good Doctor. I like that he's socially akward but have charisma and is a tough guy.
_________________
English is not my first language.
I thought the first film was better but this one is still worth watching. More of an action packed buddy movie. The autism aspect is toned down a little. It was about 20 people in the theater. From my observations of them I would think about everyone of them were autistic or in the company of someone autistic.
_________________
English is not my first language.
It was an enjoyable film, although the characters were kind of jolty. I felt they had a bunch of messages
to get across and they made the script around that rather than an actual plot.
Lots of cringy pet-related stuff which I detest.
I enjoyed the first film better. I am a bit squeamish when people try to "say how autistics are" or build any kind of image.
I think although it is better to have an afflek image than a "big bang theory" image, this still is a kind of normative NT mask -- using violence to solve problems etc.
"Look this autistic person can be cool in the ways you think are cool too".
This slightly removes the opportunity for NT's to be open minded and see who people are individually.
I think the first film was better because it was about a remarkable complex man who got out of a tough situation, and is certainly no hero, and happens to have autism.
This film was kind of grossly over the top in its portrayal of afflek as an "autistic hero" who somehow now killed ALL the bad guys, and plus there is this other woman who is EVEN more deadly and ALSO had aquired savant syndrome and who also kills all the bad guys, and by the way the Entire clinic of young autists have become hackers and violate all the laws to do whatever they want pretty much like the NSA.
It pretty much typecast autists as ideal CIA operatives and expected people to see that as a good thing.